机器人辅助手术的伦理景观:系统回顾。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise, Dawid Pieper, Robert Ranisch
{"title":"机器人辅助手术的伦理景观:系统回顾。","authors":"Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise, Dawid Pieper, Robert Ranisch","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02228-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted surgery has been widely adopted in recent years. However, compared to other health technologies operating in close proximity to patients in a vulnerable state, ethical issues of robot-assisted surgery have received less attention. Against the background of increasing automation that is expected to raise new ethical issues, this systematic review aims to map the state of the ethical debate in this field. A protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023397951). Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Philosophers' Index, IEEE Xplorer, Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2023. Screening, extraction, and analysis were conducted independently by two authors. A qualitative narrative synthesis was performed. Out of 1723 records, 66 records were included in the final dataset. Seven major strands of the ethical debate emerged during the analysis. These include questions of harms and benefits, responsibility and control, professional-patient relationship, ethical issues in surgical training and learning, justice, translational questions, and economic considerations. The identified themes testify to a broad range of different ethical issues requiring careful deliberation and integration into the surgical ethos. Looking forward, we argue that a different perspective in addressing robotic surgical devices might be helpful to consider upcoming challenges of automation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ethical landscape of robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise, Dawid Pieper, Robert Ranisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02228-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robot-assisted surgery has been widely adopted in recent years. However, compared to other health technologies operating in close proximity to patients in a vulnerable state, ethical issues of robot-assisted surgery have received less attention. Against the background of increasing automation that is expected to raise new ethical issues, this systematic review aims to map the state of the ethical debate in this field. A protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023397951). Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Philosophers' Index, IEEE Xplorer, Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2023. Screening, extraction, and analysis were conducted independently by two authors. A qualitative narrative synthesis was performed. Out of 1723 records, 66 records were included in the final dataset. Seven major strands of the ethical debate emerged during the analysis. These include questions of harms and benefits, responsibility and control, professional-patient relationship, ethical issues in surgical training and learning, justice, translational questions, and economic considerations. The identified themes testify to a broad range of different ethical issues requiring careful deliberation and integration into the surgical ethos. Looking forward, we argue that a different perspective in addressing robotic surgical devices might be helpful to consider upcoming challenges of automation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02228-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02228-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,机器人辅助手术已被广泛采用。然而,与其他医疗技术相比,机器人辅助手术的伦理问题受到的关注较少。在自动化程度日益提高的背景下,预计会引发新的伦理问题,本系统综述旨在绘制该领域伦理辩论的状态。一项方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO CRD42023397951)中注册。Medline通过PubMed、EMBASE、CINHAL、Philosophers’Index、IEEE explorer、Web of Science (Core Collection)、Scopus和谷歌Scholar于2023年1月检索。筛选、提取和分析由两位作者独立进行。进行了定性的叙事综合。在1723条记录中,有66条记录包含在最终数据集中。在分析过程中出现了七个主要的伦理争论。这些问题包括危害和益处、责任和控制、医患关系、外科培训和学习中的伦理问题、正义、转化问题和经济考虑。确定的主题证明了广泛的不同的伦理问题,需要仔细考虑和整合到外科精神。展望未来,我们认为在解决机器人手术设备的不同角度可能有助于考虑即将到来的自动化挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ethical landscape of robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Robot-assisted surgery has been widely adopted in recent years. However, compared to other health technologies operating in close proximity to patients in a vulnerable state, ethical issues of robot-assisted surgery have received less attention. Against the background of increasing automation that is expected to raise new ethical issues, this systematic review aims to map the state of the ethical debate in this field. A protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023397951). Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Philosophers' Index, IEEE Xplorer, Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2023. Screening, extraction, and analysis were conducted independently by two authors. A qualitative narrative synthesis was performed. Out of 1723 records, 66 records were included in the final dataset. Seven major strands of the ethical debate emerged during the analysis. These include questions of harms and benefits, responsibility and control, professional-patient relationship, ethical issues in surgical training and learning, justice, translational questions, and economic considerations. The identified themes testify to a broad range of different ethical issues requiring careful deliberation and integration into the surgical ethos. Looking forward, we argue that a different perspective in addressing robotic surgical devices might be helpful to consider upcoming challenges of automation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信