衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Julio César Moreno-Alfonso MD, Ada Molina Caballero MD, Alberto Pérez Martínez MD, PhD, María Concepción Yárnoz Irazábal MD, PhD
{"title":"衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。","authors":"Julio César Moreno-Alfonso MD,&nbsp;Ada Molina Caballero MD,&nbsp;Alberto Pérez Martínez MD, PhD,&nbsp;María Concepción Yárnoz Irazábal MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/ans.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can present several challenges, leading to an increased risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a novel adjunctive diagnostic tool for appendicitis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic study of patients with appendicitis and non-surgical abdominal pain (AP) admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and dNLR were compared between the two groups of patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 202 patients were enrolled: 101 with appendicitis (69% male, age 9.9 years) and 101 with AP (56% male, age 9.4 years). WBC, NLR, and dNLR were higher in patients in the appendicitis group than in those in the AP group (16.47 versus 11.18 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup>; 9.5 versus 3.3; and 5.2 versus 2.3; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, area under ROC curve, and cutoff point of dNLR for the diagnosis of appendicitis were 71%, 74%, 73%, 0.811, and 3.78, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for WBC, NLR, and dNLR were 1.95, 2.05 and 2.77.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>dNLR is a novel and noninvasive biomarker with high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. Its inclusion as an additional diagnostic tool in clinical practice may aid in determining the need for further studies in cases with ambiguous presentations and a dNLR value ≥3.78.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"95 3","pages":"423-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for acute appendicitis\",\"authors\":\"Julio César Moreno-Alfonso MD,&nbsp;Ada Molina Caballero MD,&nbsp;Alberto Pérez Martínez MD, PhD,&nbsp;María Concepción Yárnoz Irazábal MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can present several challenges, leading to an increased risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a novel adjunctive diagnostic tool for appendicitis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic study of patients with appendicitis and non-surgical abdominal pain (AP) admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and dNLR were compared between the two groups of patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 202 patients were enrolled: 101 with appendicitis (69% male, age 9.9 years) and 101 with AP (56% male, age 9.4 years). WBC, NLR, and dNLR were higher in patients in the appendicitis group than in those in the AP group (16.47 versus 11.18 × 10<sup>3</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup>; 9.5 versus 3.3; and 5.2 versus 2.3; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, area under ROC curve, and cutoff point of dNLR for the diagnosis of appendicitis were 71%, 74%, 73%, 0.811, and 3.78, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for WBC, NLR, and dNLR were 1.95, 2.05 and 2.77.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>dNLR is a novel and noninvasive biomarker with high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. Its inclusion as an additional diagnostic tool in clinical practice may aid in determining the need for further studies in cases with ambiguous presentations and a dNLR value ≥3.78.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"95 3\",\"pages\":\"423-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童阑尾炎的诊断可能会带来一些挑战,导致并发症的风险增加。在此,我们旨在评估衍生性中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)作为阑尾炎的一种新的辅助诊断工具的诊断价值。方法:对2020 ~ 2022年我院收治的阑尾炎合并非手术性腹痛(AP)患者进行诊断研究。比较两组患者白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和dNLR。结果:总共纳入202例患者:101例阑尾炎患者(69%为男性,年龄9.9岁),101例AP患者(56%为男性,年龄9.4岁)。阑尾炎组患者WBC、NLR和dNLR高于AP组(16.47 vs 11.18 × 103细胞/mm3;9.5 vs 3.3;5.2 vs 2.3;P≤0.0001)。dNLR诊断阑尾炎的敏感性为71%,特异性为74%,阳性预测值为73%,ROC曲线下面积为0.811,截断点为3.78。WBC、NLR和dNLR的阳性似然比分别为1.95、2.05和2.77。结论:dNLR是诊断阑尾炎的一种新型、无创、准确度高的生物标志物。将其作为临床实践中的附加诊断工具,可能有助于确定是否需要对表现不明确且dNLR值≥3.78的病例进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for acute appendicitis

Background

The diagnosis of appendicitis in children can present several challenges, leading to an increased risk of complications. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as a novel adjunctive diagnostic tool for appendicitis.

Methods

Diagnostic study of patients with appendicitis and non-surgical abdominal pain (AP) admitted to our hospital between 2020 and 2022. White blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and dNLR were compared between the two groups of patients.

Results

Overall, 202 patients were enrolled: 101 with appendicitis (69% male, age 9.9 years) and 101 with AP (56% male, age 9.4 years). WBC, NLR, and dNLR were higher in patients in the appendicitis group than in those in the AP group (16.47 versus 11.18 × 103 cells/mm3; 9.5 versus 3.3; and 5.2 versus 2.3; P ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, area under ROC curve, and cutoff point of dNLR for the diagnosis of appendicitis were 71%, 74%, 73%, 0.811, and 3.78, respectively. The positive likelihood ratios for WBC, NLR, and dNLR were 1.95, 2.05 and 2.77.

Conclusion

dNLR is a novel and noninvasive biomarker with high accuracy for diagnosing appendicitis. Its inclusion as an additional diagnostic tool in clinical practice may aid in determining the need for further studies in cases with ambiguous presentations and a dNLR value ≥3.78.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信