Louise Foley, Shauna O'Mahony, Yvonne Ryan-Fogarty, Catherine B Woods, Katie Robinson, Colin Fitzpatrick, James Green
{"title":"社会经济处境不利人群的自行车运动:范围界定审查协议。","authors":"Louise Foley, Shauna O'Mahony, Yvonne Ryan-Fogarty, Catherine B Woods, Katie Robinson, Colin Fitzpatrick, James Green","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.14005.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Active mobility, such as walking, wheeling, and cycling, is a low-carbon transport mode and a source of physical activity. Cycling, as a form of active mobility, is associated with physical and mental health benefits, transport cost savings, and improved air quality. During the transition to sustainable mobility, equitable outcomes depend on opportunities for active mobility reaching across our societies. This review will chart what is currently known about cycling among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a scoping review to understand the extent and type of evidence reporting utility cycling (i.e., cycling for transport) among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include studies involving adult participants who are described as experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Studies will be included if the focus/objective relates to utility cycling and the study reports cycling experiences, purposes, barriers, enablers, frequencies, perceptions, correlates, determinants, impacts, and/or interventions. Primary research using a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method design will be considered. Relevant peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, dissertations/theses, and preprints will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. A search strategy that includes key terms and subject headings was developed and translated for use across the following databases: PsycINFO (via EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCOhost), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (via Web of Science), Europe PMC (preprints), and OpenAlex (preprints). Database search results will be collated in Zotero and uploaded to Covidence for study selection. Titles, abstracts, and subsequent full texts will be independently screened by two reviewers. Data will be extracted from the included studies using a data-extraction tool. Data will be synthesized in two stages: (1) charting the data and (2) descriptive qualitative content analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"8 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycling among people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Louise Foley, Shauna O'Mahony, Yvonne Ryan-Fogarty, Catherine B Woods, Katie Robinson, Colin Fitzpatrick, James Green\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.14005.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Active mobility, such as walking, wheeling, and cycling, is a low-carbon transport mode and a source of physical activity. Cycling, as a form of active mobility, is associated with physical and mental health benefits, transport cost savings, and improved air quality. During the transition to sustainable mobility, equitable outcomes depend on opportunities for active mobility reaching across our societies. This review will chart what is currently known about cycling among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a scoping review to understand the extent and type of evidence reporting utility cycling (i.e., cycling for transport) among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include studies involving adult participants who are described as experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Studies will be included if the focus/objective relates to utility cycling and the study reports cycling experiences, purposes, barriers, enablers, frequencies, perceptions, correlates, determinants, impacts, and/or interventions. Primary research using a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method design will be considered. Relevant peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, dissertations/theses, and preprints will be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. A search strategy that includes key terms and subject headings was developed and translated for use across the following databases: PsycINFO (via EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCOhost), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (via Web of Science), Europe PMC (preprints), and OpenAlex (preprints). Database search results will be collated in Zotero and uploaded to Covidence for study selection. Titles, abstracts, and subsequent full texts will be independently screened by two reviewers. Data will be extracted from the included studies using a data-extraction tool. Data will be synthesized in two stages: (1) charting the data and (2) descriptive qualitative content analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14005.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14005.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:主动出行,如步行、骑车、骑车等,是一种低碳的交通方式,也是身体活动的一种来源。骑自行车作为一种积极的交通方式,有益于身心健康,节约交通成本,改善空气质量。在向可持续流动过渡的过程中,公平的结果取决于在我们的社会中实现积极流动的机会。这篇综述将列出目前已知的社会经济劣势人群的骑车情况。目的:进行范围审查,以了解报告社会经济劣势人群中公用事业骑车(即骑自行车作为交通工具)的证据的程度和类型。纳入标准:本综述将包括被描述为经历社会经济劣势的成年参与者的研究。如果研究的重点/目标与效用循环有关,并且研究报告了循环的经验、目的、障碍、促成因素、频率、感知、相关因素、决定因素、影响和/或干预措施,则将纳入研究。将考虑使用定性、定量或混合方法设计的初步研究。相关的同行评审文章,会议记录,学位论文/论文和预印本将包括在内。方法:评估将按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围评估指南进行。包括关键术语和主题标题的搜索策略被开发和翻译,用于以下数据库:PsycINFO(通过EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus(通过EBSCOhost), CINAHL(通过EBSCOhost), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest学位论文和论文(通过Web of Science), Europe PMC(预印本)和OpenAlex(预印本)。数据库搜索结果将在Zotero中进行整理,并上传到covid进行研究选择。题目、摘要和随后的全文将由两位审稿人独立筛选。使用数据提取工具从纳入的研究中提取数据。数据将在两个阶段合成:(1)绘制数据图和(2)描述性定性内容分析。
Cycling among people experiencing socio-economic disadvantage: a scoping review protocol.
Introduction: Active mobility, such as walking, wheeling, and cycling, is a low-carbon transport mode and a source of physical activity. Cycling, as a form of active mobility, is associated with physical and mental health benefits, transport cost savings, and improved air quality. During the transition to sustainable mobility, equitable outcomes depend on opportunities for active mobility reaching across our societies. This review will chart what is currently known about cycling among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.
Objective: To conduct a scoping review to understand the extent and type of evidence reporting utility cycling (i.e., cycling for transport) among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.
Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies involving adult participants who are described as experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Studies will be included if the focus/objective relates to utility cycling and the study reports cycling experiences, purposes, barriers, enablers, frequencies, perceptions, correlates, determinants, impacts, and/or interventions. Primary research using a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method design will be considered. Relevant peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, dissertations/theses, and preprints will be included.
Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidance for scoping reviews. A search strategy that includes key terms and subject headings was developed and translated for use across the following databases: PsycINFO (via EBSCOhost), SPORTDiscus (via EBSCOhost), CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (via Web of Science), Europe PMC (preprints), and OpenAlex (preprints). Database search results will be collated in Zotero and uploaded to Covidence for study selection. Titles, abstracts, and subsequent full texts will be independently screened by two reviewers. Data will be extracted from the included studies using a data-extraction tool. Data will be synthesized in two stages: (1) charting the data and (2) descriptive qualitative content analysis.