类型修改

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Laura Haupt
{"title":"类型修改","authors":"Laura Haupt","doi":"10.1002/hast.4967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>The January-February 2025 issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report <i>launches a new format for the journal's multipiece case studies. The basic concept of HCR's traditional format remains—different arguments are advanced by different authors in response to an ethical dilemma arising from a case. However, the two arguments are now developed in separate essays. In addition to this issue's case study are pieces covering a variety of topics, including “involuntary adoption” and the “legislative coercion” of antiabortion law, the use of brain-activity data to infer people's mental states, and the relevance of metaphysical, social, and ethical considerations to the question of whether brain death constitutes death</i>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 1","pages":"inside_front_cover"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genre Modification\",\"authors\":\"Laura Haupt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hast.4967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><i>The January-February 2025 issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report <i>launches a new format for the journal's multipiece case studies. The basic concept of HCR's traditional format remains—different arguments are advanced by different authors in response to an ethical dilemma arising from a case. However, the two arguments are now developed in separate essays. In addition to this issue's case study are pieces covering a variety of topics, including “involuntary adoption” and the “legislative coercion” of antiabortion law, the use of brain-activity data to infer people's mental states, and the relevance of metaphysical, social, and ethical considerations to the question of whether brain death constitutes death</i>.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"inside_front_cover\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.4967\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hastings Center Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4967\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.4967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《黑斯廷斯中心报告》2025年1 - 2月刊为该杂志的多件案例研究推出了一种新格式。HCR的传统格式的基本概念仍然存在——不同的作者提出了不同的论点来回应由一个案例引起的道德困境。然而,这两个论点现在是在不同的文章中发展起来的。除了这个问题的案例研究之外,还有涵盖各种主题的文章,包括“非自愿收养”和反堕胎法的“立法强制”,使用大脑活动数据推断人们的精神状态,以及形而上学,社会和伦理考虑与脑死亡是否构成死亡的问题的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genre Modification

The January-February 2025 issue of the Hastings Center Report launches a new format for the journal's multipiece case studies. The basic concept of HCR's traditional format remains—different arguments are advanced by different authors in response to an ethical dilemma arising from a case. However, the two arguments are now developed in separate essays. In addition to this issue's case study are pieces covering a variety of topics, including “involuntary adoption” and the “legislative coercion” of antiabortion law, the use of brain-activity data to infer people's mental states, and the relevance of metaphysical, social, and ethical considerations to the question of whether brain death constitutes death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信