在高等教育机构预约和使用多学科临床模拟实验室进行自主模拟学习的经验

Q2 Nursing
Lebogang B. Phehla
{"title":"在高等教育机构预约和使用多学科临床模拟实验室进行自主模拟学习的经验","authors":"Lebogang B. Phehla","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of simulation-based learning in nursing education and training has grown in recent years so much that it is nearly impossible for a nurse not to have practiced in simulation environments [with or without the guidance of an instructor] before being credentialed to treat real patients. However, student nurses’ access to a clinical teaching and learning facility like a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory is hindered by several factors that impact negatively on the use of this teaching and learning facility for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL).</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study aimed to explore and describe the experiences of student nurses with booking and use of a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL) at a higher education institution (HEI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive design that is contextual in nature was employed in this study. A purposeful sample (N = 19) of student nurses were interviewed through focus group interviews. Data were analyzed using Tesch’s method of data analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ambiguous booking process of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL was the main theme with the following subthemes 1) Inadequate information on how student nurses can book simulation laboratory 2) Student nurses not being prioritized 3) Rules for utilizing the clinical simulation laboratory are not clearly defined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study participants described their experiences with the booking of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL brought to light that the ambiguous clinical simulation laboratory booking system contributes to the underutilization of SSL by student nurses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of student nurses with the booking and use of a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory for self-directed simulation learning at a higher education institution\",\"authors\":\"Lebogang B. Phehla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of simulation-based learning in nursing education and training has grown in recent years so much that it is nearly impossible for a nurse not to have practiced in simulation environments [with or without the guidance of an instructor] before being credentialed to treat real patients. However, student nurses’ access to a clinical teaching and learning facility like a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory is hindered by several factors that impact negatively on the use of this teaching and learning facility for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL).</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study aimed to explore and describe the experiences of student nurses with booking and use of a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL) at a higher education institution (HEI).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive design that is contextual in nature was employed in this study. A purposeful sample (N = 19) of student nurses were interviewed through focus group interviews. Data were analyzed using Tesch’s method of data analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ambiguous booking process of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL was the main theme with the following subthemes 1) Inadequate information on how student nurses can book simulation laboratory 2) Student nurses not being prioritized 3) Rules for utilizing the clinical simulation laboratory are not clearly defined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study participants described their experiences with the booking of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL brought to light that the ambiguous clinical simulation laboratory booking system contributes to the underutilization of SSL by student nurses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139125000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139125000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,基于模拟的学习在护理教育和培训中的应用越来越多,以至于护士在获得治疗真实病人的资格之前,几乎不可能没有在模拟环境中进行过练习(有或没有讲师的指导)。然而,学生护士使用临床教学设施,如多学科临床模拟实验室,受到几个因素的阻碍,这些因素对使用这种教学设施进行自主模拟学习(SSL)产生负面影响。目的本研究旨在探讨和描述一所高等教育机构(HEI)的护生预约和使用多学科临床模拟实验室进行自主模拟学习(SSL)的经验。方法本研究采用了定性、探索性和描述性设计。采用焦点小组访谈法,对有目的的19名护生进行访谈。数据分析采用Tesch的数据分析方法。结果临床模拟实验室预约流程模糊是本次调查的主要主题,其次是学生护士预约模拟实验室的信息不足;其次是学生护士没有得到优先考虑;第三是临床模拟实验室的使用规则没有明确规定。结论研究参与者描述了他们对SSL临床模拟实验室的预约经历,揭示了模糊的临床模拟实验室预约制度导致了学生护士对SSL的利用不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of student nurses with the booking and use of a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory for self-directed simulation learning at a higher education institution

Background

The use of simulation-based learning in nursing education and training has grown in recent years so much that it is nearly impossible for a nurse not to have practiced in simulation environments [with or without the guidance of an instructor] before being credentialed to treat real patients. However, student nurses’ access to a clinical teaching and learning facility like a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory is hindered by several factors that impact negatively on the use of this teaching and learning facility for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL).

Aim

The study aimed to explore and describe the experiences of student nurses with booking and use of a multidisciplinary clinical simulation laboratory for self-directed simulation-based learning (SSL) at a higher education institution (HEI).

Methods

A qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive design that is contextual in nature was employed in this study. A purposeful sample (N = 19) of student nurses were interviewed through focus group interviews. Data were analyzed using Tesch’s method of data analysis.

Results

Ambiguous booking process of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL was the main theme with the following subthemes 1) Inadequate information on how student nurses can book simulation laboratory 2) Student nurses not being prioritized 3) Rules for utilizing the clinical simulation laboratory are not clearly defined.

Conclusion

The study participants described their experiences with the booking of the clinical simulation laboratory for SSL brought to light that the ambiguous clinical simulation laboratory booking system contributes to the underutilization of SSL by student nurses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信