为了更好的社会责任和正义,科学研究伦理的全球行程:文献计量学分析与回顾。

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1504937
Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi
{"title":"为了更好的社会责任和正义,科学研究伦理的全球行程:文献计量学分析与回顾。","authors":"Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi","doi":"10.3389/frma.2025.1504937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance of ethical conduct in scientific research to maintain integrity, credibility, and societal relevance has been highlighted. The findings revealed a growing awareness of ethical issues, as evidenced by the development of numerous guidelines, codes of conduct, and oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including the lack of standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding of the factors contributing to unethical behavior, and unclear definitions of ethical violations. To address these issues, this study recommends promoting transparency and data sharing, enhancing education, and training programs, establishing robust mechanisms to identify and address misconduct, and encouraging collaborative research and open science practices. This study emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to restore public confidence in science, protect its positive impact, and effectively address global challenges, while upholding the principles of social responsibility and justice. This comprehensive approach is crucial for maintaining research credibility, conserving resources, and safeguarding both the research participants and the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"10 ","pages":"1504937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review.\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Sonya Mawussi Adjovi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frma.2025.1504937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance of ethical conduct in scientific research to maintain integrity, credibility, and societal relevance has been highlighted. The findings revealed a growing awareness of ethical issues, as evidenced by the development of numerous guidelines, codes of conduct, and oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including the lack of standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding of the factors contributing to unethical behavior, and unclear definitions of ethical violations. To address these issues, this study recommends promoting transparency and data sharing, enhancing education, and training programs, establishing robust mechanisms to identify and address misconduct, and encouraging collaborative research and open science practices. This study emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to restore public confidence in science, protect its positive impact, and effectively address global challenges, while upholding the principles of social responsibility and justice. This comprehensive approach is crucial for maintaining research credibility, conserving resources, and safeguarding both the research participants and the public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"1504937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1504937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1504937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用文献计量分析和系统回顾相结合的方法,对科学研究伦理进行了全面的概述。科学研究中的道德行为对于保持诚信、信誉和社会相关性的重要性得到了强调。调查结果显示,人们对道德问题的认识日益增强,许多指导方针、行为守则和监督机构的制定就是明证。然而,重大挑战仍然存在,包括缺乏检测不当行为的标准化方法,对导致不道德行为的因素的理解有限,以及对违反道德行为的定义不明确。为了解决这些问题,本研究建议提高透明度和数据共享,加强教育和培训计划,建立强有力的机制来识别和解决不当行为,并鼓励合作研究和开放科学实践。本研究强调需要一种合作方式来恢复公众对科学的信心,保护其积极影响,并有效应对全球挑战,同时坚持社会责任和正义原则。这种综合方法对于维持研究可信度、节约资源以及保护研究参与者和公众至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review.

This study provides a comprehensive overview of research ethics in science using an approach that combine bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The importance of ethical conduct in scientific research to maintain integrity, credibility, and societal relevance has been highlighted. The findings revealed a growing awareness of ethical issues, as evidenced by the development of numerous guidelines, codes of conduct, and oversight institutions. However, significant challenges persist, including the lack of standardized approaches for detecting misconduct, limited understanding of the factors contributing to unethical behavior, and unclear definitions of ethical violations. To address these issues, this study recommends promoting transparency and data sharing, enhancing education, and training programs, establishing robust mechanisms to identify and address misconduct, and encouraging collaborative research and open science practices. This study emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to restore public confidence in science, protect its positive impact, and effectively address global challenges, while upholding the principles of social responsibility and justice. This comprehensive approach is crucial for maintaining research credibility, conserving resources, and safeguarding both the research participants and the public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信