用x线摄影检测犬膝关节内植入物穿透:一项尸体研究。

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/vsu.14238
Ryan G Philips, Richard M Jerram, Damian Chase
{"title":"用x线摄影检测犬膝关节内植入物穿透:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Ryan G Philips, Richard M Jerram, Damian Chase","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if intra-articular implant penetration (IAIP) could be detected with radiography when implants were placed at predetermined positions within the canine stifle.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Five skeletally mature canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Periarticular implants (3.5 mm stainless steel cortical screws) were placed in the proximomedial tibia and directed toward either the medial or lateral tibial condyle to a predetermined distance from the joint surface: -2 mm (below the joint surface), 0 mm (at the level of the subchondral bone), and 2 mm (above the joint surface). Joint examination was performed to confirm IAIP. Standard orthogonal radiographic views of the stifle were obtained. Radiographs were reviewed by registered small animal surgery and radiology specialists, residents, and board-eligible residents via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 32.4% of radiographs were incorrectly classified as penetrating the joint surface. Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle were misclassified more frequently than those directed toward the medial tibial condyle (23.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively). The overall accuracy of detecting IAIP of the stifle with radiography was 77.9% with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.2% and 67.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 32% of non-penetrating implants were incorrectly identified as penetrating the joint, particularly those directed laterally. The overall accuracy of radiography for the detection of IAIP of the stifle was 78%.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>While radiography can be effective in detecting IAIP, there is a significant rate of misclassification, especially for non-penetrating implants, which may lead to unnecessary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"461-469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of intra-articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan G Philips, Richard M Jerram, Damian Chase\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if intra-articular implant penetration (IAIP) could be detected with radiography when implants were placed at predetermined positions within the canine stifle.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Experimental cadaveric study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Five skeletally mature canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Periarticular implants (3.5 mm stainless steel cortical screws) were placed in the proximomedial tibia and directed toward either the medial or lateral tibial condyle to a predetermined distance from the joint surface: -2 mm (below the joint surface), 0 mm (at the level of the subchondral bone), and 2 mm (above the joint surface). Joint examination was performed to confirm IAIP. Standard orthogonal radiographic views of the stifle were obtained. Radiographs were reviewed by registered small animal surgery and radiology specialists, residents, and board-eligible residents via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 32.4% of radiographs were incorrectly classified as penetrating the joint surface. Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle were misclassified more frequently than those directed toward the medial tibial condyle (23.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively). The overall accuracy of detecting IAIP of the stifle with radiography was 77.9% with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.2% and 67.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 32% of non-penetrating implants were incorrectly identified as penetrating the joint, particularly those directed laterally. The overall accuracy of radiography for the detection of IAIP of the stifle was 78%.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>While radiography can be effective in detecting IAIP, there is a significant rate of misclassification, especially for non-penetrating implants, which may lead to unnecessary interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"461-469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨在犬膝关节内预定位置植入关节内植入物(IAIP)时,x线片是否能检测到关节内植入物的穿透情况。研究设计:实验性尸体研究。样本人群:五具骨骼成熟的犬类尸体。方法:关节周植入物(3.5 mm不锈钢皮质螺钉)放置在胫骨近内侧,并指向胫骨内侧或外侧髁,与关节面保持预定距离:-2 mm(关节面以下),0 mm(软骨下骨水平)和2 mm(关节面以上)。进行联合检查以确认IAIP。获得了膝关节的标准正交x线片。x光片由注册小动物外科和放射学专家、住院医生和符合委员会资格的住院医生通过在线调查进行审查。结果:总体而言,32.4%的x线片被错误地归类为穿透关节面。指向外侧胫骨髁的植入物比指向内侧胫骨髁的植入物更容易被错误分类(分别为23.8%和8.3%)。x线摄影检测膝关节IAIP的总体准确率为77.9%,敏感性和特异性分别为97.2%和67.6%。结论:大约32%的非穿透性种植体被错误地识别为穿透关节,特别是那些侧向的种植体。x线摄影检测膝关节IAIP的总体准确率为78%。临床意义:虽然x线摄影可以有效地检测IAIP,但存在明显的误分类率,特别是对于非穿透性种植体,这可能导致不必要的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of intra-articular implant penetration of the canine stifle with radiography: A cadaveric study.

Objective: To determine if intra-articular implant penetration (IAIP) could be detected with radiography when implants were placed at predetermined positions within the canine stifle.

Study design: Experimental cadaveric study.

Sample population: Five skeletally mature canine cadavers.

Methods: Periarticular implants (3.5 mm stainless steel cortical screws) were placed in the proximomedial tibia and directed toward either the medial or lateral tibial condyle to a predetermined distance from the joint surface: -2 mm (below the joint surface), 0 mm (at the level of the subchondral bone), and 2 mm (above the joint surface). Joint examination was performed to confirm IAIP. Standard orthogonal radiographic views of the stifle were obtained. Radiographs were reviewed by registered small animal surgery and radiology specialists, residents, and board-eligible residents via an online survey.

Results: Overall, 32.4% of radiographs were incorrectly classified as penetrating the joint surface. Implants directed toward the lateral tibial condyle were misclassified more frequently than those directed toward the medial tibial condyle (23.8% vs. 8.3%, respectively). The overall accuracy of detecting IAIP of the stifle with radiography was 77.9% with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.2% and 67.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: Approximately 32% of non-penetrating implants were incorrectly identified as penetrating the joint, particularly those directed laterally. The overall accuracy of radiography for the detection of IAIP of the stifle was 78%.

Clinical significance: While radiography can be effective in detecting IAIP, there is a significant rate of misclassification, especially for non-penetrating implants, which may lead to unnecessary interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信