探索识别多重施暴者性暴力的测量策略:比过去的研究更高的患病率

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
RaeAnn E. Anderson, Erica L. Goodman, Frances G. Eby, Katya M. Mickelson, Zoe D. Peterson
{"title":"探索识别多重施暴者性暴力的测量策略:比过去的研究更高的患病率","authors":"RaeAnn E. Anderson,&nbsp;Erica L. Goodman,&nbsp;Frances G. Eby,&nbsp;Katya M. Mickelson,&nbsp;Zoe D. Peterson","doi":"10.1002/ab.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Prior research suggests that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence (e.g., gang rape) is very rare—reported by less than 2% of individuals. However, these estimates may be outdated and biased by measurement. The goal of this study was to explore the prevalence of multiple-perpetrator sexual violence and ways to measure it. Data were aggregated across several studies that shared similar methodology in recruiting online, anonymous samples of adults (Table 1). Study 1 evaluated victimization across five samples of 2491 participants. Study 2 evaluated perpetration across four samples of 2699 participants. All participants completed questionnaires in a randomized order. Reported prevalence rates for victimization were higher than prior research (1.5%) and ranged between 2.8% and 10.9% (Table 2) with an average of 4.86% (see Table 3). Multiple-perpetrator victimization items were significantly correlated with other victimization items suggesting validity, phi = 0.182–0.371. Reported prevalence rates of perpetration ranged from 0.8 to 18.9% with an average of 6.43%. Multiple-perpetrator perpetration items were significantly correlated with other perpetration items, suggesting validity, phi = 0.190–0.582. Our findings suggest that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence is more common than previously suggested. Psychometric analyses suggest initial validity, utility, and acceptability for all examined measures that should be further investigated in primary data collections.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Measurement Strategies for Identifying Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Violence: Higher Prevalence Rates Than Past Research\",\"authors\":\"RaeAnn E. Anderson,&nbsp;Erica L. Goodman,&nbsp;Frances G. Eby,&nbsp;Katya M. Mickelson,&nbsp;Zoe D. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ab.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Prior research suggests that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence (e.g., gang rape) is very rare—reported by less than 2% of individuals. However, these estimates may be outdated and biased by measurement. The goal of this study was to explore the prevalence of multiple-perpetrator sexual violence and ways to measure it. Data were aggregated across several studies that shared similar methodology in recruiting online, anonymous samples of adults (Table 1). Study 1 evaluated victimization across five samples of 2491 participants. Study 2 evaluated perpetration across four samples of 2699 participants. All participants completed questionnaires in a randomized order. Reported prevalence rates for victimization were higher than prior research (1.5%) and ranged between 2.8% and 10.9% (Table 2) with an average of 4.86% (see Table 3). Multiple-perpetrator victimization items were significantly correlated with other victimization items suggesting validity, phi = 0.182–0.371. Reported prevalence rates of perpetration ranged from 0.8 to 18.9% with an average of 6.43%. Multiple-perpetrator perpetration items were significantly correlated with other perpetration items, suggesting validity, phi = 0.190–0.582. Our findings suggest that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence is more common than previously suggested. Psychometric analyses suggest initial validity, utility, and acceptability for all examined measures that should be further investigated in primary data collections.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aggressive Behavior\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aggressive Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.70021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,多重施暴者的性暴力(如轮奸)非常罕见,只有不到2%的人报告。然而,这些估计可能是过时的和有偏差的测量。本研究的目的是探讨多重施暴者性暴力的普遍性及其测量方法。数据汇总在几项研究中,这些研究在在线招募匿名成人样本时采用了类似的方法(表1)。研究1评估了2491名参与者的5个样本的受害情况。研究2评估了四个样本的2699名参与者的犯罪行为。所有参与者按随机顺序完成问卷调查。报告的受害患病率高于之前的研究(1.5%),范围在2.8%至10.9%之间(表2),平均为4.86%(见表3)。多重施暴者受害项目与其他受害项目显著相关,表明效度,phi = 0.182-0.371。报告的犯罪流行率从0.8%到18.9%不等,平均为6.43%。多重行凶者的行凶项与其他行凶项显著相关,提示效度,phi = 0.190 ~ 0.582。我们的研究结果表明,多重施暴者的性暴力比之前认为的更为普遍。心理测量分析表明,所有被检查的措施的初始有效性、效用和可接受性,应在主要数据收集中进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Measurement Strategies for Identifying Multiple-Perpetrator Sexual Violence: Higher Prevalence Rates Than Past Research

Prior research suggests that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence (e.g., gang rape) is very rare—reported by less than 2% of individuals. However, these estimates may be outdated and biased by measurement. The goal of this study was to explore the prevalence of multiple-perpetrator sexual violence and ways to measure it. Data were aggregated across several studies that shared similar methodology in recruiting online, anonymous samples of adults (Table 1). Study 1 evaluated victimization across five samples of 2491 participants. Study 2 evaluated perpetration across four samples of 2699 participants. All participants completed questionnaires in a randomized order. Reported prevalence rates for victimization were higher than prior research (1.5%) and ranged between 2.8% and 10.9% (Table 2) with an average of 4.86% (see Table 3). Multiple-perpetrator victimization items were significantly correlated with other victimization items suggesting validity, phi = 0.182–0.371. Reported prevalence rates of perpetration ranged from 0.8 to 18.9% with an average of 6.43%. Multiple-perpetrator perpetration items were significantly correlated with other perpetration items, suggesting validity, phi = 0.190–0.582. Our findings suggest that multiple-perpetrator sexual violence is more common than previously suggested. Psychometric analyses suggest initial validity, utility, and acceptability for all examined measures that should be further investigated in primary data collections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信