Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang
{"title":"影响妊娠糖尿病患者焦虑因素的路径研究。","authors":"Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pathway study of factors influencing anxiety in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A pathway study of factors influencing anxiety in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Background: This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.
Methods: The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.
Results: Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).
Conclusion: The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.