影响妊娠糖尿病患者焦虑因素的路径研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang
{"title":"影响妊娠糖尿病患者焦虑因素的路径研究。","authors":"Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pathway study of factors influencing anxiety in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Li, Ziwei Yu, Jingjing Liang, Qian Ye, Sijia Li, Yanxia Chen, Weiqiang Chen, Yiling Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07282-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pathway study of factors influencing anxiety in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Background: This study aims to assess anxiety severity among patients with and to elucidate the predominant psychological factors, informing the development of targeted anxiety management strategies.

Methods: The cross-sectional study recruited 421 GDM patients via convenience sampling from Guangdong Province, China. Self-administered questionnaires, including the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale, Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Type D Personality Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, and General Self-Efficacy Scale, were utilized to gather data. Data analysis was performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS 25.0 and SPSS 25.0.

Results: Among patients with GDM, anxiety was significantly and positively associated with negative coping styles (β = 0.190, P < 0.01) and Type D personality (β = 0.167, P < 0.01), indicating their roles in exacerbating anxiety. In contrast, positive coping (β=-0.136, P < 0.01), perceived social support (β=-0.206, P < 0.01) and general self efficacy (β=-0.49, P < 0.01) had direct negative impacts on anxiety, suggesting their protective influence. Mediation analysis revealed that negative coping and Type D personality exerted significant mediating effects on anxiety, with the pathway from negative coping through Type D personality explaining 16% of the indirect effect (β = 2.302, 95% CI: 1.411 ~ 3.350) and the pathway from Type D personality through perceived social support explaining 32% of the indirect effect (β = 4.528, 95% CI: 3.231 ~ 5.913).

Conclusion: The study identifies key psychological modifiers of anxiety in GDM, suggesting that targeted psychological support could mitigate anxiety and improve pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信