Willems和Cameriere法在6-14岁孟加拉儿童牙龄估计中的比较评价

Q1 Medicine

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.02.006

Mehuli Kar , Aruna Sharma , Kaushik Dutta , Rekha Puttanavar , Sanguida A , Ezhumalai Govindasamy

{"title":"Willems和Cameriere法在6-14岁孟加拉儿童牙龄估计中的比较评价","authors":"Mehuli Kar , Aruna Sharma , Kaushik Dutta , Rekha Puttanavar , Sanguida A , Ezhumalai Govindasamy","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The knowledge of dental age estimation is essential to assess growth and development which aids in designing a treatment plan. Willems and Cameriere methods are the two most widely used approaches of dental age estimation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the two methods, among 6–14 year old children of Bengal populace. The secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of Sante DICOM Viewer and CorelDRAW Graphic Suite in assessing dental age by Cameriere method.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The study sample encompassed 411 digital panoramic radiographs. Dental age was estimated using Willems and Cameriere methods. CorelDRAW Graphic Suite and Sante DICOM Viewer software were used for dental age estimation by Cameriere method. Paired <em>t</em>-test was applied for the inter group comparison. Pearson correlation coefficient was also used to measure the regression among all the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dental age was overestimated by 0.286 years using Willems method (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between dental ages estimated by Cameriere method using both software (p = 0.130).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the methods were equally applicable for age estimation in the targeted population. Cameriere method can be performed with equivalent accuracy using both software.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 433-439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of Willems and Cameriere methods of dental age estimation among 6–14 year old Bengali children\",\"authors\":\"Mehuli Kar , Aruna Sharma , Kaushik Dutta , Rekha Puttanavar , Sanguida A , Ezhumalai Govindasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The knowledge of dental age estimation is essential to assess growth and development which aids in designing a treatment plan. Willems and Cameriere methods are the two most widely used approaches of dental age estimation.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the two methods, among 6–14 year old children of Bengal populace. The secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of Sante DICOM Viewer and CorelDRAW Graphic Suite in assessing dental age by Cameriere method.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The study sample encompassed 411 digital panoramic radiographs. Dental age was estimated using Willems and Cameriere methods. CorelDRAW Graphic Suite and Sante DICOM Viewer software were used for dental age estimation by Cameriere method. Paired <em>t</em>-test was applied for the inter group comparison. Pearson correlation coefficient was also used to measure the regression among all the groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Dental age was overestimated by 0.286 years using Willems method (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between dental ages estimated by Cameriere method using both software (p = 0.130).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the methods were equally applicable for age estimation in the targeted population. Cameriere method can be performed with equivalent accuracy using both software.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 433-439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825000478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426825000478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景牙齿年龄估计的知识是必不可少的评估生长和发展，有助于设计治疗计划。Willems法和Cameriere法是牙龄估计中应用最广泛的两种方法。目的本研究的主要目的是评估两种方法在孟加拉6-14岁儿童中的可靠性和适用性。次要目的是比较Sante DICOM Viewer和CorelDRAW Graphic Suite用Cameriere法评估牙龄的疗效。材料与方法研究样本包括411张数字全景x线照片。采用Willems和Cameriere方法估计牙龄。采用CorelDRAW Graphic Suite和Sante DICOM Viewer软件，采用Cameriere法估算牙龄。组间比较采用配对t检验。采用Pearson相关系数衡量各组间的回归。结果Willems法高估牙龄0.286岁（p = 0.001）。camiere法牙龄与camiere法牙龄比较差异无统计学意义（p = 0.130）。结论两种方法同样适用于目标人群的年龄估计。两种软件均能以相当的精度进行Cameriere法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of Willems and Cameriere methods of dental age estimation among 6–14 year old Bengali children

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparative evaluation of Willems and Cameriere methods of dental age estimation among 6–14 year old Bengali children

Background

The knowledge of dental age estimation is essential to assess growth and development which aids in designing a treatment plan. Willems and Cameriere methods are the two most widely used approaches of dental age estimation.

Aim

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and applicability of the two methods, among 6–14 year old children of Bengal populace. The secondary objective was to compare the efficacy of Sante DICOM Viewer and CorelDRAW Graphic Suite in assessing dental age by Cameriere method.

Materials and methods

The study sample encompassed 411 digital panoramic radiographs. Dental age was estimated using Willems and Cameriere methods. CorelDRAW Graphic Suite and Sante DICOM Viewer software were used for dental age estimation by Cameriere method. Paired t-test was applied for the inter group comparison. Pearson correlation coefficient was also used to measure the regression among all the groups.

Results

Dental age was overestimated by 0.286 years using Willems method (p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between dental ages estimated by Cameriere method using both software (p = 0.130).

Conclusion

Both the methods were equally applicable for age estimation in the targeted population. Cameriere method can be performed with equivalent accuracy using both software.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

133

审稿时长

167 days

期刊介绍： Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.