经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院结果和再入院率的性别差异。

Q3 Medicine
Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113
Jackeline P Vajta Gomez, Dae Yong Park, Maxwell D Eder, Seokyung An, Angela Lowenstern, Michelle D Kelsey, Jennifer A Rymer, Pamela S Douglas, Michael G Nanna
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院结果和再入院率的性别差异。","authors":"Jackeline P Vajta Gomez, Dae Yong Park, Maxwell D Eder, Seokyung An, Angela Lowenstern, Michelle D Kelsey, Jennifer A Rymer, Pamela S Douglas, Michael G Nanna","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have reported worse outcomes in women following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but contemporary studies examining sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmission risk are lacking. Therefore, we sought to compare 90-day readmission rates and in-hospital adverse outcomes after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the United States National Readmissions Database to stratify all inpatient PCIs from 2017 to 2018 by sex. We then performed propensity score matching of the two groups based on demographics, medical history, hospital characteristics, clinical presentation, socioeconomic status, and procedures. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmission to the hospital. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and additional in-hospital outcomes. We performed Cox proportional-hazards modeling to compare the hazard of readmission between women and men and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for the secondary outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 206,556 women and 205,134 men were included. At index hospitalization, women experienced higher odds of in-hospital mortality, hypovolemic shock, and need of blood transfusion, while men experienced higher odds of cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury. Women had a higher hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.18, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15), with the greatest difference seen among younger women <45 years of age. Findings were similar after stratification into different age groups and clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial sex differences in outcomes after PCI persist, with variable sex differences in in-hospital complications, and women at higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission to the hospital. Given the clinical and reimbursement implications of readmissions to patients and health systems, urgent efforts are needed to close these gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 2","pages":"159-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Jackeline P Vajta Gomez, Dae Yong Park, Maxwell D Eder, Seokyung An, Angela Lowenstern, Michelle D Kelsey, Jennifer A Rymer, Pamela S Douglas, Michael G Nanna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have reported worse outcomes in women following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but contemporary studies examining sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmission risk are lacking. Therefore, we sought to compare 90-day readmission rates and in-hospital adverse outcomes after PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the United States National Readmissions Database to stratify all inpatient PCIs from 2017 to 2018 by sex. We then performed propensity score matching of the two groups based on demographics, medical history, hospital characteristics, clinical presentation, socioeconomic status, and procedures. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmission to the hospital. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and additional in-hospital outcomes. We performed Cox proportional-hazards modeling to compare the hazard of readmission between women and men and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for the secondary outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 206,556 women and 205,134 men were included. At index hospitalization, women experienced higher odds of in-hospital mortality, hypovolemic shock, and need of blood transfusion, while men experienced higher odds of cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury. Women had a higher hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.18, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15), with the greatest difference seen among younger women <45 years of age. Findings were similar after stratification into different age groups and clinical presentations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial sex differences in outcomes after PCI persist, with variable sex differences in in-hospital complications, and women at higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission to the hospital. Given the clinical and reimbursement implications of readmissions to patients and health systems, urgent efforts are needed to close these gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"159-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2025.2452113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究报道了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后女性的预后较差,但当代缺乏关于住院预后和90天再入院风险的性别差异的研究。因此,我们试图比较PCI术后90天再入院率和院内不良结局。方法:我们使用美国国家再入院数据库按性别对2017年至2018年所有住院pci患者进行分层。然后,我们根据人口统计学、病史、医院特征、临床表现、社会经济地位和治疗程序对两组患者进行倾向评分匹配。主要观察指标为90天再入院。次要结局包括30天再入院、院内死亡率和其他院内结局。我们使用Cox比例风险模型来比较女性和男性再入院的风险,并使用逻辑回归来计算次要结局的优势比。结果:倾向评分匹配后,纳入206556名女性和205134名男性。在指数住院时,女性的住院死亡率、低血容量性休克和需要输血的几率更高,而男性的心脏骤停、颅内出血和急性肾损伤的几率更高。女性患者30天再入院风险较高(风险比1.16,95%可信区间1.14-1.18,P)结论:PCI术后结局存在显著的性别差异,院内并发症存在可变的性别差异,女性患者30天和90天再入院风险较高。鉴于再入院对患者和卫生系统的临床和报销影响,需要紧急努力缩小这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: Previous studies have reported worse outcomes in women following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but contemporary studies examining sex differences in in-hospital outcomes and 90-day readmission risk are lacking. Therefore, we sought to compare 90-day readmission rates and in-hospital adverse outcomes after PCI.

Methods: We used the United States National Readmissions Database to stratify all inpatient PCIs from 2017 to 2018 by sex. We then performed propensity score matching of the two groups based on demographics, medical history, hospital characteristics, clinical presentation, socioeconomic status, and procedures. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day readmission to the hospital. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, in-hospital mortality, and additional in-hospital outcomes. We performed Cox proportional-hazards modeling to compare the hazard of readmission between women and men and logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for the secondary outcomes of interest.

Results: After propensity score matching, 206,556 women and 205,134 men were included. At index hospitalization, women experienced higher odds of in-hospital mortality, hypovolemic shock, and need of blood transfusion, while men experienced higher odds of cardiac arrest, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury. Women had a higher hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.18, P < 0.01) and 90-day readmission (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.15), with the greatest difference seen among younger women <45 years of age. Findings were similar after stratification into different age groups and clinical presentations.

Conclusion: Substantial sex differences in outcomes after PCI persist, with variable sex differences in in-hospital complications, and women at higher risk of 30- and 90-day readmission to the hospital. Given the clinical and reimbursement implications of readmissions to patients and health systems, urgent efforts are needed to close these gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信