IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Shamay S M Ng, Peiming Chen, Tai Wa Liu, Chloe H L Li, Tony H H Tang, Jackie L Y Lau, Cindy Y K Ng, Ken C W Tang, Lily Y W Ho, Cynthia Y Y Lai, Jingjung Li, Mimi M Y Tse
{"title":"Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 in people with stroke.","authors":"Shamay S M Ng, Peiming Chen, Tai Wa Liu, Chloe H L Li, Tony H H Tang, Jackie L Y Lau, Cindy Y K Ng, Ken C W Tang, Lily Y W Ho, Cynthia Y Y Lai, Jingjung Li, Mimi M Y Tse","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2469471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 (FICSIT-4) is a measure that assesses standing balance ability. However, the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4 have not been examined in people with stroke.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4, including its internal consistency, test - retest reliability, concurrent validity, and known-group validity, and identify the cutoff score on the FICSIT-4 that discriminates people with stroke from healthy older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-two participants with stroke and 49 age-matched healthy controls were recruited. The FICSIT-4 was administered twice, on days 1 and 2, with a 1-week interval, to the participants with stroke to examine test - retest reliability. Various health-related measures were also administered to the stroke participants on day 1. The FICISIT-4 was only administered once, on day 1, to the healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FICIST-4 was found to exhibit fair internal consistency, good test - retest reliability and significant correlations with various health-related outcome measures. It also demonstrated known-group validity, and a score of 25 was found to distinguish people with stroke from healthy older people.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FICISIT-4 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the standing balance ability of people with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2469471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱与损伤:4 (FICSIT-4) 是一种评估站立平衡能力的测量方法。然而,FICSIT-4 的心理测量特性尚未在中风患者中进行过研究:研究 FICSIT-4 的心理测量特性,包括其内部一致性、测试-重测信度、并发效度和已知组效度,并确定 FICSIT-4 的临界分值,以区分脑卒中患者和健康老年人:方法:招募 62 名中风患者和 49 名年龄匹配的健康对照者。方法:招募 62 名脑卒中患者和 49 名年龄匹配的健康对照者,分别在第 1 天和第 2 天进行两次 FICSIT-4,每次间隔 1 周,以考察测试-重测的可靠性。在第 1 天还对脑卒中患者进行了各种健康相关测量。FICISIT-4 只在第 1 天对健康参与者进行了一次测试:结果:FICIST-4 显示出较好的内部一致性、良好的测试-重测可靠性以及与各种健康相关结果测量的显著相关性。结果:FICISIT-4 表现出较好的内部一致性、良好的测试-重测可靠性以及与各种健康相关结果测量的显著相关性,同时还表现出已知组的有效性,25 分可将中风患者与健康老年人区分开来:结论:FICISIT-4 是评估脑卒中患者站立平衡能力的可靠有效的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 in people with stroke.

Background: The Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques - 4 (FICSIT-4) is a measure that assesses standing balance ability. However, the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4 have not been examined in people with stroke.

Objectives: To investigate the psychometric properties of the FICSIT-4, including its internal consistency, test - retest reliability, concurrent validity, and known-group validity, and identify the cutoff score on the FICSIT-4 that discriminates people with stroke from healthy older people.

Methods: Sixty-two participants with stroke and 49 age-matched healthy controls were recruited. The FICSIT-4 was administered twice, on days 1 and 2, with a 1-week interval, to the participants with stroke to examine test - retest reliability. Various health-related measures were also administered to the stroke participants on day 1. The FICISIT-4 was only administered once, on day 1, to the healthy participants.

Results: The FICIST-4 was found to exhibit fair internal consistency, good test - retest reliability and significant correlations with various health-related outcome measures. It also demonstrated known-group validity, and a score of 25 was found to distinguish people with stroke from healthy older people.

Conclusion: The FICISIT-4 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the standing balance ability of people with stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信