策略性使用大数据:实施血清叶酸和血清钴胺素的参考区间。

Alicia Madurga, Ariadna Arbiol-Roca, Maria Rosa Navarro-Badal, Anna Cortes-Bosch de Basea, Dolors Dot-Bach
{"title":"策略性使用大数据:实施血清叶酸和血清钴胺素的参考区间。","authors":"Alicia Madurga, Ariadna Arbiol-Roca, Maria Rosa Navarro-Badal, Anna Cortes-Bosch de Basea, Dolors Dot-Bach","doi":"10.11613/BM.2025.010705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.</p>","PeriodicalId":94370,"journal":{"name":"Biochemia medica","volume":"35 1","pages":"010705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic use of Big Data: implementing reference intervals for serum folate and serum cobalamin.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Madurga, Ariadna Arbiol-Roca, Maria Rosa Navarro-Badal, Anna Cortes-Bosch de Basea, Dolors Dot-Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.11613/BM.2025.010705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"010705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemia medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2025.010705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2025.010705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定义血清叶酸(FOL)或血清钴胺素(VITB12)的可信参考区间(RIs)是一项艰巨的任务。本研究的目的是使用实验室信息系统的间接方法间接生成FOL和VITB12的RIs。材料和方法:在一家三级保健实验室医院进行了为期12个月的回顾性观察研究。所有FOL和VITB12测试均使用Cobas8000 e801系统(罗氏诊断公司,德国曼海姆)进行测量。RIs采用非参数方法计算。在使用直接和间接方法抽样的两个验证队列中,通过计算落在新RIs之外的RIs的比例来验证本研究中建立的RIs。结果:共获得19214个(FOL)和27420个(VITB12)结果。FOL的RIs为4.5 nmol/L(90%置信区间(CI) 4.4-4.6)至38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5), VITB12的RIs为140 pmol/L (CI 139-141)至659 pmol/L (CI 657-660)。验证包括8,798个FOL结果和7,365个VITB12结果。这两个数值都是可以接受的,因为只有0.1%的FOL和0.02%的VITB12结果落在RIs之外。最后,用20个个体的直接法对RIs进行了验证。20/20的FOL病例和19/20的VITB12病例在估计的RIs范围内。结论:总之,使用间接数据方法使我们能够计算FOL和VITB12的RIs。在我们的研究中获得的RIs低于制造商提出的FOL和VITB12的RIs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic use of Big Data: implementing reference intervals for serum folate and serum cobalamin.

Introduction: Defining trustworthy reference intervals (RIs) for serum folate (FOL) or serum cobalamin (VITB12) is a difficult task. The purpose of this study is to use an indirect approach from the laboratory information's system to indirectly generate RIs for FOL and VITB12.

Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed at a tertiary-care laboratory's hospital during 12 months. All FOL and VITB12 tests were measured using a Cobas8000 e801 system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The RIs were calculated using a non-parametric approach. The RIs established in the present study were verified by calculating the fraction of RIs that fell outside the new RIs, in two validation cohorts sampled using the direct and indirect method.

Results: A total of 19,214 (FOL) and 27,420 (VITB12) results were obtained. The RIs were 4.5 nmol/L (90% confidence intervals (CI) 4.4-4.6) to 38.4 nmol/L (CI 38.3-38.5) for FOL and 140 pmol/L (CI 139-141) to 659 pmol/L (CI 657-660) for VITB12. The verification included 8,798 FOL results and 7,365 VITB12 results. For both magnitudes was acceptable since only 0.1% of FOL and 0.02% of VITB12 results fell outside the RIs. Finally, the RIs were verified using a direct method with twenty individuals. For FOL 20/20 cases and 19/20 of VITB12 cases fell within the estimated RIs.

Conclusions: In summary, the use of an indirect data approach has enabled us to calculate RIs for FOL and VITB12. The RIs obtained in our study are lower than those proposed by the manufacturer for both FOL and VITB12.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信