IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Aysegul Unutkan , Sercan Mansuroğlu , Kübra Karabulut , Imran Boylu Gülek , Emel Elem , Fatma Deniz Sayiner
{"title":"A phenomenological study on the views of birthing room professionals on obstetric violence","authors":"Aysegul Unutkan ,&nbsp;Sercan Mansuroğlu ,&nbsp;Kübra Karabulut ,&nbsp;Imran Boylu Gülek ,&nbsp;Emel Elem ,&nbsp;Fatma Deniz Sayiner","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study investigates the perspectives of birthing room professionals regarding obstetric violence.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phenomenological study involved 17 participants, including ten midwives and seven physicians (three faculty members, one specialist physician, and three assistant physicians) who had worked in the birthing room of a public hospital for at least one year. Data were collected using an \"Unstructured Interview Form\" and an \"Introductory Information Form.\" One researcher transcribed the data, which was independently reviewed by three others, and then analysed by categorising it into smaller sections using codes. The MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 programme was used to code the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two key themes emerged during the interviews: \"views on acts of violence\" and \"causes of violence\". Within the theme of 'views on acts of violence,' two categories were identified: 'awareness of violence' and 'ignoring/denying violence.' In the theme of 'causes of violence,' three categories were identified: 'pregnant women-related causes', 'originating from birthing room professionals,’ and 'system-originated.'</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Birthing room professionals classified certain forms of obstetric violence as aggressive and impolite behaviour, whereas others were seen as normal during childbirth. Raising awareness among birthing room professionals about obstetric violence and ethical beliefs is essential, as is establishing social and institutional support systems to ensure respectful, individualised care throughout the birthing process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了分娩室专业人员对产科暴力的看法。方法本现象学研究涉及 17 名参与者,包括 10 名助产士和 7 名医生(3 名教师、1 名专科医生和 3 名助理医生),他们都曾在一家公立医院的分娩室工作过至少一年。数据收集使用了 "非结构化访谈表 "和 "介绍信息表"。一名研究人员对数据进行誊写,由另外三名研究人员进行独立审核,然后使用代码对数据进行分类分析。研究人员使用 MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 程序对数据进行编码:结果在访谈过程中出现了两个关键主题:"对暴力行为的看法 "和 "暴力的原因"。在 "对暴力行为的看法 "这一主题中,确定了两个类别:对暴力的认识 "和 "忽视/否认暴力"。在 "暴力原因 "主题中,确定了三个类别:结论产房专业人员将某些形式的产科暴力归类为攻击性和无礼行为,而其他形式的暴力则被视为分娩过程中的正常现象。提高分娩室专业人员对产科暴力和伦理信仰的认识至关重要,建立社会和机构支持系统以确保在整个分娩过程中提供尊重和个性化的护理也同样重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A phenomenological study on the views of birthing room professionals on obstetric violence

Aim

This study investigates the perspectives of birthing room professionals regarding obstetric violence.

Methods

This phenomenological study involved 17 participants, including ten midwives and seven physicians (three faculty members, one specialist physician, and three assistant physicians) who had worked in the birthing room of a public hospital for at least one year. Data were collected using an "Unstructured Interview Form" and an "Introductory Information Form." One researcher transcribed the data, which was independently reviewed by three others, and then analysed by categorising it into smaller sections using codes. The MAXQDA Analytics Pro 2022 programme was used to code the data.

Results

Two key themes emerged during the interviews: "views on acts of violence" and "causes of violence". Within the theme of 'views on acts of violence,' two categories were identified: 'awareness of violence' and 'ignoring/denying violence.' In the theme of 'causes of violence,' three categories were identified: 'pregnant women-related causes', 'originating from birthing room professionals,’ and 'system-originated.'

Conclusion

Birthing room professionals classified certain forms of obstetric violence as aggressive and impolite behaviour, whereas others were seen as normal during childbirth. Raising awareness among birthing room professionals about obstetric violence and ethical beliefs is essential, as is establishing social and institutional support systems to ensure respectful, individualised care throughout the birthing process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信