北爱尔兰高地影响农民参与农业环境计划的因素

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Barry Quinn , Stuart Henderson , Lynsey Hollywood , Simone Angioloni , Paul Caskie
{"title":"北爱尔兰高地影响农民参与农业环境计划的因素","authors":"Barry Quinn ,&nbsp;Stuart Henderson ,&nbsp;Lynsey Hollywood ,&nbsp;Simone Angioloni ,&nbsp;Paul Caskie","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agri-environment schemes (AES) have long been used as a policy lever to promote pro-environmental behaviours within farming communities. However, the role of AES is now becoming more prominent as subsidies to farmers increasingly shift from productive to environmental goals. Yet, questions remain about how to overcome entrenched barriers to widening AES participation, and how to deliver more radical systems-level transformation via such schemes. Focusing on the upland context, this paper explores how perceptions and experiences of AES inform receptiveness to future AES participation and new forms of environmental action (especially results-based schemes and peatland restoration). The paper specifically focuses on beef and sheep upland farm settings within Northern Ireland, with data collected through a series of group discussions across the region. The results show that while there are entrenched (and often critical) views towards AES, as well as a perception of existing strength in environmental stewardship, nevertheless, behavioural change towards new and more radical approaches is possible via future AES.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103598"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting farmer participation in agri-environment schemes in the uplands of Northern Ireland\",\"authors\":\"Barry Quinn ,&nbsp;Stuart Henderson ,&nbsp;Lynsey Hollywood ,&nbsp;Simone Angioloni ,&nbsp;Paul Caskie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Agri-environment schemes (AES) have long been used as a policy lever to promote pro-environmental behaviours within farming communities. However, the role of AES is now becoming more prominent as subsidies to farmers increasingly shift from productive to environmental goals. Yet, questions remain about how to overcome entrenched barriers to widening AES participation, and how to deliver more radical systems-level transformation via such schemes. Focusing on the upland context, this paper explores how perceptions and experiences of AES inform receptiveness to future AES participation and new forms of environmental action (especially results-based schemes and peatland restoration). The paper specifically focuses on beef and sheep upland farm settings within Northern Ireland, with data collected through a series of group discussions across the region. The results show that while there are entrenched (and often critical) views towards AES, as well as a perception of existing strength in environmental stewardship, nevertheless, behavioural change towards new and more radical approaches is possible via future AES.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000385\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000385","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业环境计划(AES)长期以来一直被用作促进农业社区内亲环境行为的政策杠杆。然而,随着对农民的补贴日益从生产目标转向环境目标,农业生产标准的作用现在变得更加突出。然而,如何克服扩大AES参与的根深蒂固的障碍,以及如何通过此类计划实现更彻底的系统级转型,这些问题仍然存在。本文以高地环境为重点,探讨了对生态系统的认知和经验如何为未来生态系统的参与和新形式的环境行动(特别是基于结果的计划和泥炭地恢复)提供信息。该论文特别关注北爱尔兰的牛肉和羊高地农场环境,并通过该地区的一系列小组讨论收集了数据。结果表明,虽然对AES有根深蒂固的(通常是批评的)看法,以及对环境管理现有力量的看法,然而,通过未来的AES,对新的和更激进的方法的行为改变是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting farmer participation in agri-environment schemes in the uplands of Northern Ireland
Agri-environment schemes (AES) have long been used as a policy lever to promote pro-environmental behaviours within farming communities. However, the role of AES is now becoming more prominent as subsidies to farmers increasingly shift from productive to environmental goals. Yet, questions remain about how to overcome entrenched barriers to widening AES participation, and how to deliver more radical systems-level transformation via such schemes. Focusing on the upland context, this paper explores how perceptions and experiences of AES inform receptiveness to future AES participation and new forms of environmental action (especially results-based schemes and peatland restoration). The paper specifically focuses on beef and sheep upland farm settings within Northern Ireland, with data collected through a series of group discussions across the region. The results show that while there are entrenched (and often critical) views towards AES, as well as a perception of existing strength in environmental stewardship, nevertheless, behavioural change towards new and more radical approaches is possible via future AES.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信