动脉化疗药物方案对视网膜母细胞瘤患者全球挽救结果的影响。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Xiaoyu He, Minglei Han, Min Zhou, Peiwei Chai, Lei Guo, Jiayan Fan, Xuyang Wen, Xianqun Fan
{"title":"动脉化疗药物方案对视网膜母细胞瘤患者全球挽救结果的影响。","authors":"Xiaoyu He, Minglei Han, Min Zhou, Peiwei Chai, Lei Guo, Jiayan Fan, Xuyang Wen, Xianqun Fan","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effect of three-drug regimen (melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin) with two-drug regimen (melphalan and topotecan) on the globe salvage outcomes of retinoblastoma (Rb) with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients with 87 eyes received two-drug regimen IAC, and 95 patients with 97 eyes received three-drug regimen IAC. Propensity score matching was applied, and 84 matched (42:42) patients (eyes) were analysed. All Rb patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination before IAC using a wide-angle digital fundus camera, which was repeated monthly after the globe salvage management. Progression-free ocular survival (PFOS), relapse rate and local complications were analysed per affected eye. Analysis of overall survival (OS) and systemic complications was based on Rb individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes treated with three-drug regimen IAC presented with higher overall PFOS than those treated with two-drug regimen IAC (p=0.026). Stratified analysis showed PFOS rate in three-drug group was higher than two-drug group among group D eyes (88.5% vs 60.6%, p=0.009). Consistently, among group E eyes, three-drug group correlated with a better PFOS, compared with two-drug group (42.9% vs 23.5%, p=0.002). There did not present with significant differences in OS (p=0.853), relapse rate (p=0.291), incidence of moderate-severe myelosuppression (grade 3-4, p=0.564) or ophthalmic artery obstruction (p=0.998) between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-drug regimen was a superior IAC management compared with two-drug regiment, with improved progression-free ocular outcome for eyes of advanced retinoblastomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intra-arterial chemotherapy drug regimens on globe salvage outcomes of retinoblastoma patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu He, Minglei Han, Min Zhou, Peiwei Chai, Lei Guo, Jiayan Fan, Xuyang Wen, Xianqun Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2024-326452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effect of three-drug regimen (melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin) with two-drug regimen (melphalan and topotecan) on the globe salvage outcomes of retinoblastoma (Rb) with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 83 patients with 87 eyes received two-drug regimen IAC, and 95 patients with 97 eyes received three-drug regimen IAC. Propensity score matching was applied, and 84 matched (42:42) patients (eyes) were analysed. All Rb patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination before IAC using a wide-angle digital fundus camera, which was repeated monthly after the globe salvage management. Progression-free ocular survival (PFOS), relapse rate and local complications were analysed per affected eye. Analysis of overall survival (OS) and systemic complications was based on Rb individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes treated with three-drug regimen IAC presented with higher overall PFOS than those treated with two-drug regimen IAC (p=0.026). Stratified analysis showed PFOS rate in three-drug group was higher than two-drug group among group D eyes (88.5% vs 60.6%, p=0.009). Consistently, among group E eyes, three-drug group correlated with a better PFOS, compared with two-drug group (42.9% vs 23.5%, p=0.002). There did not present with significant differences in OS (p=0.853), relapse rate (p=0.291), incidence of moderate-severe myelosuppression (grade 3-4, p=0.564) or ophthalmic artery obstruction (p=0.998) between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three-drug regimen was a superior IAC management compared with two-drug regiment, with improved progression-free ocular outcome for eyes of advanced retinoblastomas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326452\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较三药方案(美法兰、拓扑替康和卡铂)与两药方案(美法兰和拓扑替康)对动脉化疗(IAC)视网膜母细胞瘤(Rb)全球挽救结局的影响。方法:本研究纳入83例87眼双药方案IAC患者,95例97眼三药方案IAC患者。采用倾向评分匹配,对84例(42:42)匹配患者(眼)进行分析。所有Rb患者在IAC前使用广角数字眼底相机进行眼科检查,在球体修复管理后每月重复一次。分析每只受累眼的无进展眼生存(PFOS)、复发率和局部并发症。总生存期(OS)和系统性并发症的分析基于Rb个体。结果:三药IAC组的全氟辛烷磺酸水平高于两药IAC组(p=0.026)。分层分析显示,D组患者三药组PFOS发生率高于两药组(88.5% vs 60.6%, p=0.009)。在E组中,三药组的PFOS优于两药组(42.9% vs 23.5%, p=0.002)。两组患者OS (p=0.853)、复发率(p=0.291)、中重度骨髓抑制发生率(3-4级,p=0.564)、眼动脉梗阻发生率(p=0.998)差异无统计学意义。结论:与双药组相比,三药组是一种更好的IAC治疗方案,对于晚期视网膜母细胞瘤的眼睛,无进展的眼部预后得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of intra-arterial chemotherapy drug regimens on globe salvage outcomes of retinoblastoma patients.

Aims: To compare the effect of three-drug regimen (melphalan, topotecan and carboplatin) with two-drug regimen (melphalan and topotecan) on the globe salvage outcomes of retinoblastoma (Rb) with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC).

Methods: This study included 83 patients with 87 eyes received two-drug regimen IAC, and 95 patients with 97 eyes received three-drug regimen IAC. Propensity score matching was applied, and 84 matched (42:42) patients (eyes) were analysed. All Rb patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination before IAC using a wide-angle digital fundus camera, which was repeated monthly after the globe salvage management. Progression-free ocular survival (PFOS), relapse rate and local complications were analysed per affected eye. Analysis of overall survival (OS) and systemic complications was based on Rb individuals.

Results: Eyes treated with three-drug regimen IAC presented with higher overall PFOS than those treated with two-drug regimen IAC (p=0.026). Stratified analysis showed PFOS rate in three-drug group was higher than two-drug group among group D eyes (88.5% vs 60.6%, p=0.009). Consistently, among group E eyes, three-drug group correlated with a better PFOS, compared with two-drug group (42.9% vs 23.5%, p=0.002). There did not present with significant differences in OS (p=0.853), relapse rate (p=0.291), incidence of moderate-severe myelosuppression (grade 3-4, p=0.564) or ophthalmic artery obstruction (p=0.998) between these two groups.

Conclusions: Three-drug regimen was a superior IAC management compared with two-drug regiment, with improved progression-free ocular outcome for eyes of advanced retinoblastomas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信