又落后了?描述和评估老年人在与视频推荐互动中的算法素养

IF 2.8 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yuhao Zhang, Jiqun Liu
{"title":"又落后了?描述和评估老年人在与视频推荐互动中的算法素养","authors":"Yuhao Zhang,&nbsp;Jiqun Liu","doi":"10.1002/asi.24960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Algorithms play a significant role in shaping our experiences of interacting with intelligent information systems but also inherit and amplify data biases, potentially leading to unfair decisions or discriminatory outcomes. This motivates us to investigate users' <i>algorithm literacy</i>, which covers the awareness and knowledge of algorithms and the skills to intervene in the operations of personalization algorithms when interacting with recommendation systems. Since vulnerable groups are more likely to suffer from the negative consequences of algorithmic decision-making, investigating algorithm literacy among such groups is critical. This study aims to examine older adults' algorithm literacy, who are often considered a vulnerable group and labeled as digital laggards in contemporary information society. The empirical evidence collected from 21 participants in in-depth interviews and cognitive mapping studies demonstrated that almost all participants are algorithm-aware to some extent and identified (1) three types of information and sources collected by algorithms in user understanding, (2) two paradigms of how respondents understand personalized recommendations, and (3) two sets of strategies they develop to employ algorithms for improving user experience. The findings shed light on designing human-centered intelligent information systems for unbiased personalization and developing a more inclusive AI-assisted society that equally benefits people of all ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":48810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"76 3","pages":"604-620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Falling behind again? Characterizing and assessing older adults' algorithm literacy in interactions with video recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Yuhao Zhang,&nbsp;Jiqun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/asi.24960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Algorithms play a significant role in shaping our experiences of interacting with intelligent information systems but also inherit and amplify data biases, potentially leading to unfair decisions or discriminatory outcomes. This motivates us to investigate users' <i>algorithm literacy</i>, which covers the awareness and knowledge of algorithms and the skills to intervene in the operations of personalization algorithms when interacting with recommendation systems. Since vulnerable groups are more likely to suffer from the negative consequences of algorithmic decision-making, investigating algorithm literacy among such groups is critical. This study aims to examine older adults' algorithm literacy, who are often considered a vulnerable group and labeled as digital laggards in contemporary information society. The empirical evidence collected from 21 participants in in-depth interviews and cognitive mapping studies demonstrated that almost all participants are algorithm-aware to some extent and identified (1) three types of information and sources collected by algorithms in user understanding, (2) two paradigms of how respondents understand personalized recommendations, and (3) two sets of strategies they develop to employ algorithms for improving user experience. The findings shed light on designing human-centered intelligent information systems for unbiased personalization and developing a more inclusive AI-assisted society that equally benefits people of all ages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"604-620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

算法在塑造我们与智能信息系统互动的体验方面发挥着重要作用,但也继承并放大了数据偏见,可能导致不公平的决定或歧视性的结果。这促使我们研究用户的算法素养,包括对算法的认知和知识,以及在与推荐系统交互时干预个性化算法操作的技能。由于弱势群体更有可能遭受算法决策的负面影响,因此调查这些群体的算法素养至关重要。在当代信息社会中,老年人往往被视为弱势群体,被贴上数字落后者的标签,本研究旨在考察老年人的算法素养。从21名参与者中收集的深度访谈和认知地图研究的经验证据表明,几乎所有参与者都在一定程度上具有算法意识,并确定了(1)算法在用户理解中收集的三种信息和来源,(2)受访者如何理解个性化推荐的两种范式,以及(3)他们开发的两套策略,以利用算法来改善用户体验。研究结果有助于设计以人为中心的智能信息系统,实现公正的个性化,并发展一个更具包容性的人工智能辅助社会,使所有年龄段的人都能平等受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Falling behind again? Characterizing and assessing older adults' algorithm literacy in interactions with video recommendations

Algorithms play a significant role in shaping our experiences of interacting with intelligent information systems but also inherit and amplify data biases, potentially leading to unfair decisions or discriminatory outcomes. This motivates us to investigate users' algorithm literacy, which covers the awareness and knowledge of algorithms and the skills to intervene in the operations of personalization algorithms when interacting with recommendation systems. Since vulnerable groups are more likely to suffer from the negative consequences of algorithmic decision-making, investigating algorithm literacy among such groups is critical. This study aims to examine older adults' algorithm literacy, who are often considered a vulnerable group and labeled as digital laggards in contemporary information society. The empirical evidence collected from 21 participants in in-depth interviews and cognitive mapping studies demonstrated that almost all participants are algorithm-aware to some extent and identified (1) three types of information and sources collected by algorithms in user understanding, (2) two paradigms of how respondents understand personalized recommendations, and (3) two sets of strategies they develop to employ algorithms for improving user experience. The findings shed light on designing human-centered intelligent information systems for unbiased personalization and developing a more inclusive AI-assisted society that equally benefits people of all ages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is a leading international forum for peer-reviewed research in information science. For more than half a century, JASIST has provided intellectual leadership by publishing original research that focuses on the production, discovery, recording, storage, representation, retrieval, presentation, manipulation, dissemination, use, and evaluation of information and on the tools and techniques associated with these processes. The Journal welcomes rigorous work of an empirical, experimental, ethnographic, conceptual, historical, socio-technical, policy-analytic, or critical-theoretical nature. JASIST also commissions in-depth review articles (“Advances in Information Science”) and reviews of print and other media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信