混合体外膜氧合的死亡率和并发症:初始使用与过渡的荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002392
Irin Shin, Haein Ryu, Yujeong Hou, Mi Sung Kim, Sandy Jeong Rhie
{"title":"混合体外膜氧合的死亡率和并发症:初始使用与过渡的荟萃分析。","authors":"Irin Shin, Haein Ryu, Yujeong Hou, Mi Sung Kim, Sandy Jeong Rhie","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), containing additional ECMO cannulations in addition to conventional ECMO, is increasingly used for the treatment of serious cardiopulmonary conditions. Patients initiating non-hybrid ECMO may transition to hybrid ECMO as their condition worsens. This study compared mortality rates between patients initially on hybrid ECMO and those who transitioned from non-hybrid to hybrid ECMO. We also examined complications related to hybrid ECMO, comparing them with those of non-hybrid ECMO. Data from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were analyzed using Peto odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals (CIs), with an additional safety comparison to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry to overcome the small number of selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager. The mortality rate did not differ significantly between whether the hybrid ECMO was used initially or transitioned from non-hybrid ECMO during treatment. Renal-related complications were the most frequent in both hybrid and non-hybrid ECMO cases, with overall higher complication rates in hybrid ECMO. The study concludes that transitioning to hybrid ECMO during treatment does not increase mortality compared to starting with hybrid ECMO, but potential complications, especially with commodity conditions, should be considered. This study provides valuable guidance for clinicians choosing ECMO modalities in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"363-369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality and Complications in Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-Analysis of Initial Use Versus Transition.\",\"authors\":\"Irin Shin, Haein Ryu, Yujeong Hou, Mi Sung Kim, Sandy Jeong Rhie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), containing additional ECMO cannulations in addition to conventional ECMO, is increasingly used for the treatment of serious cardiopulmonary conditions. Patients initiating non-hybrid ECMO may transition to hybrid ECMO as their condition worsens. This study compared mortality rates between patients initially on hybrid ECMO and those who transitioned from non-hybrid to hybrid ECMO. We also examined complications related to hybrid ECMO, comparing them with those of non-hybrid ECMO. Data from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were analyzed using Peto odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals (CIs), with an additional safety comparison to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry to overcome the small number of selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager. The mortality rate did not differ significantly between whether the hybrid ECMO was used initially or transitioned from non-hybrid ECMO during treatment. Renal-related complications were the most frequent in both hybrid and non-hybrid ECMO cases, with overall higher complication rates in hybrid ECMO. The study concludes that transitioning to hybrid ECMO during treatment does not increase mortality compared to starting with hybrid ECMO, but potential complications, especially with commodity conditions, should be considered. This study provides valuable guidance for clinicians choosing ECMO modalities in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"363-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002392\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混合体外膜氧合(ECMO),除了常规的ECMO外,还包含额外的ECMO插管,越来越多地用于严重心肺疾病的治疗。开始非混合型ECMO的患者可能会随着病情恶化而过渡到混合型ECMO。本研究比较了最初采用混合ECMO的患者和从非混合ECMO过渡到混合ECMO的患者的死亡率。我们还检查了与混合ECMO相关的并发症,并将其与非混合ECMO进行了比较。来自PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库的数据使用Peto优势比和95%保密区间(ci)进行分析,并与体外生命支持组织(Extracorporeal Life Support Organization)注册表进行额外的安全性比较,以克服少数选定的研究。使用review manager进行meta分析。在最初使用混合ECMO或在治疗期间从非混合ECMO过渡到混合ECMO之间,死亡率没有显着差异。肾脏相关并发症在混合型和非混合型ECMO病例中都是最常见的,混合型ECMO的总体并发症发生率更高。该研究得出结论,与混合ECMO相比,在治疗期间过渡到混合ECMO不会增加死亡率,但应考虑潜在的并发症,特别是在商品条件下。本研究为临床医师在临床实践中选择ECMO模式提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality and Complications in Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-Analysis of Initial Use Versus Transition.

Hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), containing additional ECMO cannulations in addition to conventional ECMO, is increasingly used for the treatment of serious cardiopulmonary conditions. Patients initiating non-hybrid ECMO may transition to hybrid ECMO as their condition worsens. This study compared mortality rates between patients initially on hybrid ECMO and those who transitioned from non-hybrid to hybrid ECMO. We also examined complications related to hybrid ECMO, comparing them with those of non-hybrid ECMO. Data from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were analyzed using Peto odds ratios and 95% confidential intervals (CIs), with an additional safety comparison to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry to overcome the small number of selected studies. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager. The mortality rate did not differ significantly between whether the hybrid ECMO was used initially or transitioned from non-hybrid ECMO during treatment. Renal-related complications were the most frequent in both hybrid and non-hybrid ECMO cases, with overall higher complication rates in hybrid ECMO. The study concludes that transitioning to hybrid ECMO during treatment does not increase mortality compared to starting with hybrid ECMO, but potential complications, especially with commodity conditions, should be considered. This study provides valuable guidance for clinicians choosing ECMO modalities in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信