{"title":"氟氯胺在伴有结构性心脏病的心律失常患者中的应用","authors":"Naruepat Sangpornsuk, Voravut Rungpradubvong, Tachawut Tiensantisuk, Pattranee Leelapattana, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanakul, Somchai Prechawat","doi":"10.1177/20420986251316462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of only on a limited basis in patients with normal or minimal structural heart disease. The CAST study, the only randomized controlled trials, showed increased mortality from long-term flecainide use in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, many later studies have revealed its safety when used in other structural heart diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) VT/VF in patients with structural heart disease compared to those with a normal heart when using flecainide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited patients who had received at least one dose of flecainide in the past 5 years. Baseline characteristics, indications for flecainide use, and echocardiography results were reviewed. After 1 year, we evaluated the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 447 patients had received at least one dose of flecainide, and 336 patients were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (14%) had structural heart disease as defined by our protocols. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and impaired LVEF accounted for 28% and 25% of cases, respectively. There were five patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). After 1 year, ventricular arrhythmias occurred in two patients (4.7%) in the structural heart group; these patients had also experienced arrhythmias before receiving flecainide. In the non-structural heart group, ventricular arrhythmias were detected in three patients (1.1%). In multivariate analysis, structural heart disease was not associated with an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (OR = 4.8 (0.6-38.44), <i>p</i> = 0.139).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that no patients died due to ventricular arrhythmia, and the incidence of VT/VF was not increased in patients with structural heart disease. A prospective study is needed to further evaluate the safety of flecainide in patients with structural heart disease other than ischemic heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251316462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flecainide use in arrhythmic patients who have structural heart disease.\",\"authors\":\"Naruepat Sangpornsuk, Voravut Rungpradubvong, Tachawut Tiensantisuk, Pattranee Leelapattana, Ronpichai Chokesuwattanakul, Somchai Prechawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986251316462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend the use of only on a limited basis in patients with normal or minimal structural heart disease. The CAST study, the only randomized controlled trials, showed increased mortality from long-term flecainide use in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, many later studies have revealed its safety when used in other structural heart diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) VT/VF in patients with structural heart disease compared to those with a normal heart when using flecainide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively recruited patients who had received at least one dose of flecainide in the past 5 years. Baseline characteristics, indications for flecainide use, and echocardiography results were reviewed. After 1 year, we evaluated the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 447 patients had received at least one dose of flecainide, and 336 patients were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (14%) had structural heart disease as defined by our protocols. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and impaired LVEF accounted for 28% and 25% of cases, respectively. There were five patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). After 1 year, ventricular arrhythmias occurred in two patients (4.7%) in the structural heart group; these patients had also experienced arrhythmias before receiving flecainide. In the non-structural heart group, ventricular arrhythmias were detected in three patients (1.1%). In multivariate analysis, structural heart disease was not associated with an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (OR = 4.8 (0.6-38.44), <i>p</i> = 0.139).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that no patients died due to ventricular arrhythmia, and the incidence of VT/VF was not increased in patients with structural heart disease. A prospective study is needed to further evaluate the safety of flecainide in patients with structural heart disease other than ischemic heart disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20420986251316462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11815794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251316462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251316462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前的指南建议仅在正常或轻微结构性心脏病患者的有限基础上使用。CAST研究,唯一的随机对照试验,显示长期使用氟卡奈在心肌梗死(MI)后左室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者死亡率增加。然而,许多后来的研究表明,当用于其他结构性心脏病时,它是安全的。目的:本研究探讨结构性心脏病患者与正常心脏患者在使用氟氯胺时室性心动过速(VT)或心室颤动(VF) VT/VF的发生率。方法:我们回顾性地招募了在过去5年中至少接受过一次氟氯胺治疗的患者。回顾了基线特征、氟氯胺使用适应症和超声心动图结果。1年后,我们评估了室性心律失常的发生率和全因死亡率。结果:筛选后,447例患者接受了至少一剂氟卡奈,336例患者纳入研究。47名患者(14%)患有我们的方案定义的结构性心脏病。左室肥厚(LVH)和LVEF受损分别占28%和25%。冠状动脉疾病(CAD) 5例。1年后,结构性心脏组2例(4.7%)发生室性心律失常;这些患者在服用氟氯胺之前也有过心律失常。在非结构性心脏组中,3例(1.1%)患者检测到室性心律失常。在多变量分析中,结构性心脏病与室性心律失常发生率增加无关(OR = 4.8 (0.6-38.44), p = 0.139)。结论:我们的研究显示,没有患者因室性心律失常而死亡,结构性心脏病患者的VT/VF发生率没有增加。需要一项前瞻性研究来进一步评估氟氯胺在非缺血性心脏病的结构性心脏病患者中的安全性。
Flecainide use in arrhythmic patients who have structural heart disease.
Background: Current guidelines recommend the use of only on a limited basis in patients with normal or minimal structural heart disease. The CAST study, the only randomized controlled trials, showed increased mortality from long-term flecainide use in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, many later studies have revealed its safety when used in other structural heart diseases.
Objectives: This study investigates the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) VT/VF in patients with structural heart disease compared to those with a normal heart when using flecainide.
Methods: We retrospectively recruited patients who had received at least one dose of flecainide in the past 5 years. Baseline characteristics, indications for flecainide use, and echocardiography results were reviewed. After 1 year, we evaluated the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality.
Results: After screening, 447 patients had received at least one dose of flecainide, and 336 patients were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (14%) had structural heart disease as defined by our protocols. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and impaired LVEF accounted for 28% and 25% of cases, respectively. There were five patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). After 1 year, ventricular arrhythmias occurred in two patients (4.7%) in the structural heart group; these patients had also experienced arrhythmias before receiving flecainide. In the non-structural heart group, ventricular arrhythmias were detected in three patients (1.1%). In multivariate analysis, structural heart disease was not associated with an increased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (OR = 4.8 (0.6-38.44), p = 0.139).
Conclusion: Our study showed that no patients died due to ventricular arrhythmia, and the incidence of VT/VF was not increased in patients with structural heart disease. A prospective study is needed to further evaluate the safety of flecainide in patients with structural heart disease other than ischemic heart disease.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients.
The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.