肌性颞下颌紊乱患者视觉模拟量表与无痛开口的临床分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ian Young, James Dunning, Firas Mourad, James Escaloni, Paul Bliton, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
{"title":"肌性颞下颌紊乱患者视觉模拟量表与无痛开口的临床分析。","authors":"Ian Young, James Dunning, Firas Mourad, James Escaloni, Paul Bliton, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2025.2464227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perform a clinimetric analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) and active pain-free mouth opening (PFMO) in patients with muscular temporomandibular disorder (mTMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=ICC), construct validity, responsiveness (area under the curve=AUC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS-24hr (ICC=0.59), VAS-7day (ICC= 0.54), and PFMO (ICC=0.86) exhibited acceptable reliability. Both the VAS (AUC=0.96) and PFMO (AUC=0.87) exhibited a high level of responsiveness. The MCID was 15.5mm (VAS-24 and VAS-7day) and 3.5mm (PFMO) in the improved group; and 27.5mm (VAS-24), 21mm (VAS-7day), and 6.6mm (PFMO) in the much-improved group. The MDC was 9.6mm (VAS-24), 9.5mm (VAS-7day), and 6.1mm (PFMO). All outcomes demonstrated strong construct validity (Pearson's r; p<0.001) .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three outcome measures demonstrated acceptable clinimetric properties in patients with mTMD at the 3-month follow-up. The MCID lies outside measurement error in all outcomes in the much-improved group.      .</p>","PeriodicalId":56318,"journal":{"name":"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinimetric analysis of the visual analogue scale and pain free mouth opening in patients with muscular temporomandibular disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Young, James Dunning, Firas Mourad, James Escaloni, Paul Bliton, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08869634.2025.2464227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perform a clinimetric analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) and active pain-free mouth opening (PFMO) in patients with muscular temporomandibular disorder (mTMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=ICC), construct validity, responsiveness (area under the curve=AUC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS-24hr (ICC=0.59), VAS-7day (ICC= 0.54), and PFMO (ICC=0.86) exhibited acceptable reliability. Both the VAS (AUC=0.96) and PFMO (AUC=0.87) exhibited a high level of responsiveness. The MCID was 15.5mm (VAS-24 and VAS-7day) and 3.5mm (PFMO) in the improved group; and 27.5mm (VAS-24), 21mm (VAS-7day), and 6.6mm (PFMO) in the much-improved group. The MDC was 9.6mm (VAS-24), 9.5mm (VAS-7day), and 6.1mm (PFMO). All outcomes demonstrated strong construct validity (Pearson's r; p<0.001) .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three outcome measures demonstrated acceptable clinimetric properties in patients with mTMD at the 3-month follow-up. The MCID lies outside measurement error in all outcomes in the much-improved group.      .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2025.2464227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2025.2464227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对肌肉型颞下颌紊乱(mTMD)患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和主动无痛开口(PFMO)进行临床分析。方法:计算信度(类内相关系数=ICC)、结构效度、反应性(曲线下面积=AUC)、最小可检测变化(minimum detectable change, MDC)和最小临床重要差异(minimum clinical important difference, MCID)值。结果:VAS-24hr (ICC=0.59)、VAS-7day (ICC= 0.54)和PFMO (ICC=0.86)具有可接受的信度。VAS (AUC=0.96)和PFMO (AUC=0.87)均表现出高水平的反应性。改良组MCID为15.5mm (VAS-24和vas -7天),3.5mm (PFMO);改善组为27.5mm (VAS-24)、21mm (VAS-7day)、6.6mm (PFMO)。MDC为9.6mm (VAS-24), 9.5mm (VAS-7day)和6.1mm (PFMO)。所有结果均表现出较强的构念效度(Pearson’s r;结论:在3个月的随访中,mTMD患者的所有三个结局指标均显示出可接受的临床特征。MCID存在于所有结果的测量误差之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinimetric analysis of the visual analogue scale and pain free mouth opening in patients with muscular temporomandibular disorder.

Objective: Perform a clinimetric analysis of the visual analogue scale (VAS) and active pain-free mouth opening (PFMO) in patients with muscular temporomandibular disorder (mTMD).

Methods:  Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=ICC), construct validity, responsiveness (area under the curve=AUC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated.

Results: The VAS-24hr (ICC=0.59), VAS-7day (ICC= 0.54), and PFMO (ICC=0.86) exhibited acceptable reliability. Both the VAS (AUC=0.96) and PFMO (AUC=0.87) exhibited a high level of responsiveness. The MCID was 15.5mm (VAS-24 and VAS-7day) and 3.5mm (PFMO) in the improved group; and 27.5mm (VAS-24), 21mm (VAS-7day), and 6.6mm (PFMO) in the much-improved group. The MDC was 9.6mm (VAS-24), 9.5mm (VAS-7day), and 6.1mm (PFMO). All outcomes demonstrated strong construct validity (Pearson's r; p<0.001) .

Conclusions: All three outcome measures demonstrated acceptable clinimetric properties in patients with mTMD at the 3-month follow-up. The MCID lies outside measurement error in all outcomes in the much-improved group.      .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice
Cranio-The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CRANIO: The Journal of Craniomandibular & Sleep Practice is the oldest and largest journal in the world devoted to temporomandibular disorders, and now also includes articles on all aspects of sleep medicine. The Journal is multidisciplinary in its scope, with editorial board members from all areas of medicine and dentistry, including general dentists, oral surgeons, orthopaedists, radiologists, chiropractors, professors and behavioural scientists, physical therapists, acupuncturists, osteopathic and ear, nose and throat physicians. CRANIO publishes commendable works from outstanding researchers and clinicians in their respective fields. The multidisciplinary format allows individuals practicing with a TMD emphasis to stay abreast of related disciplines, as each issue presents multiple topics from overlapping areas of interest. CRANIO''s current readership (thousands) is comprised primarily of dentists; however, many physicians, physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopathic physicians and other related specialists subscribe and contribute to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信