将#Enzian分类转变为四阶段系统:与2021 AAGL子宫内膜异位症分类比较的可行性研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Sebastian Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger
{"title":"将#Enzian分类转变为四阶段系统:与2021 AAGL子宫内膜异位症分类比较的可行性研究","authors":"Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Sebastian Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary center in Europe.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a Sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming the #Enzian Classification Into a Four-Stage System: A Feasibility Study by Comparison With the 2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Fadinger, Peter Oppelt, Philip Sebastian Trautner, Imre Szilagyi, Stefan Raidl, Simon-Hermann Enzelsberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary center in Europe.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a Sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:建立一个将#Enzian分类转化为4阶段系统的模型,并评估其在回顾性子宫内膜异位症队列中的表现。设计:可行性研究由两部分组成:第一,对#Enzian分类的翻译模型进行积分分配,分为4个阶段系统。其次,在子宫内膜异位症手术患者的回顾性队列中,AAGL2021分期和新的#Enzian分期的比较。背景:欧洲第三大中心。参与者:222名接受腹腔镜手术的子宫内膜异位症患者,并有两种分类的围手术期记录。干预措施:根据AAGL2021分类中不同解剖位置的点值定义翻译模型的基本结构。在没有直接翻译选项的情况下,通过对3名经验丰富的子宫内膜异位症外科医生的调查确定了#Enzian隔室的对应点。最后的4级系统随后在回顾性数据集中针对AAGL2021分类进行了测试。结果:子宫内膜异位症的分期分布在两种分类之间相似,每个阶段的患者百分比相当(#Enzian和AAGL2021分类的1期分别为43%和44%,2期分别为20%和24%,3期分别为11%和9%,4期分别为27%和21%)。然而,各阶段的组成略有不同,特别是在第二和第三阶段,这在桑基图中显示出来。在AAGL2021分类中不考虑B室和子宫腺肌症的某些深部子宫内膜异位症病变。结论:#Enzian分类可以很容易地转换为类似于AAGL2021分类的4阶段评分系统。也许未来的研究可以帮助根据不同的结果参数(例如,疼痛、不孕症、手术复杂性等)确定适当的分值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transforming the #Enzian Classification Into a Four-Stage System: A Feasibility Study by Comparison With the 2021 AAGL Endometriosis Classification.

Study objective: To develop a translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system and to evaluate its performance in a retrospective endometriosis cohort.

Design: Feasibility study consisting of 2 parts: First, the allocation of points for the translation model of the #Enzian classification into a 4-stage system. Second, the comparison between the AAGL2021 stages and the new #Enzian stages in a retrospective cohort of patients with endometriosis surgery.

Setting: Tertiary center in Europe.

Participants: 222 endometriosis patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery with perioperative documentation of both classifications.

Interventions: The basic structure of the translation model was defined according to the point values used in the AAGL2021 classification for different anatomical locations. In the absence of a direct translation option, the corresponding points for the #Enzian compartments were determined in a survey of 3 experienced endometriosis surgeons. The final 4-stage system was then tested against the AAGL2021 classification in a retrospective dataset.

Results: The distribution of endometriosis stages was similar between the 2 classifications, with a comparable percentage of patients in each stage (stage 1: 43% and 44%, stage 2: 20% and 24%, stage 3: 11% and 9%, stage 4: 27% and 21% for the #Enzian and AAGL2021 classifications, respectively). However, the composition of the stages differed slightly, especially in stages 2 and 3, which was shown in a Sankey diagram. Certain deep endometriotic lesions in compartment B and adenomyosis are not respected in the AAGL2021 classification.

Conclusion: The #Enzian classification can be easily converted to a 4-stage scoring system similar to the AAGL2021 classification. Perhaps future research could help to determine appropriate point values based on different outcome parameters (e.g., pain, infertility, surgical complexity, …).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信