传统的水平斜视手术仍然是高度近视的有效选择吗?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lene Maurer, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe
{"title":"传统的水平斜视手术仍然是高度近视的有效选择吗?","authors":"Lene Maurer, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe","doi":"10.1055/a-2498-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical methods to join extraocular muscles are now often used to reduce the risk of scleral perforation in strabismus surgery, but published results indicate that the outcome is highly variable. We therefore wanted to assess whether conventional horizontal strabismus surgery is still a valid option in high myopia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of patients with high myopia, defined as a spherical equivalent of ≥ - 6.0 D in at least one eye, and who had undergone conventional horizontal strabismus surgery was performed. Exotropic angles were converted to positive angles to summarize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 patients were analyzed (15 corrected for esotropia, 7 for exotropia). Prior to surgery, the mean angle of deviation, measured with the alternate prism cover test, was 33.9 prism diopters (PD; range 13 - 75 PD) at distance and 35.3 PD (range 8 - 75 PD) at near. Three months post-surgery, the overall mean dose effect (DE in PD/mm surgery) was 2.8 (standard deviation [SD] 0.5) at distance and 2.9 (SD 0.6) at near. In esotropia, the mean DE was 3.0 at both distance and near; in exotropia, the mean DE was 2.3 at distance and 2.5 at near. There were no major complications such as scleral perforations or retinal detachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data show that conventional horizontal strabismus surgery in high myopia is feasible, is not linked to an increased risk of scleral perforation, and offers predictable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Conventional Horizontal Strabismus Surgery Still a Valid Option in High Myopia?\",\"authors\":\"Lene Maurer, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2498-0202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical methods to join extraocular muscles are now often used to reduce the risk of scleral perforation in strabismus surgery, but published results indicate that the outcome is highly variable. We therefore wanted to assess whether conventional horizontal strabismus surgery is still a valid option in high myopia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of patients with high myopia, defined as a spherical equivalent of ≥ - 6.0 D in at least one eye, and who had undergone conventional horizontal strabismus surgery was performed. Exotropic angles were converted to positive angles to summarize the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22 patients were analyzed (15 corrected for esotropia, 7 for exotropia). Prior to surgery, the mean angle of deviation, measured with the alternate prism cover test, was 33.9 prism diopters (PD; range 13 - 75 PD) at distance and 35.3 PD (range 8 - 75 PD) at near. Three months post-surgery, the overall mean dose effect (DE in PD/mm surgery) was 2.8 (standard deviation [SD] 0.5) at distance and 2.9 (SD 0.6) at near. In esotropia, the mean DE was 3.0 at both distance and near; in exotropia, the mean DE was 2.3 at distance and 2.5 at near. There were no major complications such as scleral perforations or retinal detachment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data show that conventional horizontal strabismus surgery in high myopia is feasible, is not linked to an increased risk of scleral perforation, and offers predictable results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2498-0202\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2498-0202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在斜视手术中,通常采用连接眼外肌的手术方法来降低巩膜穿孔的风险,但已发表的研究结果表明,结果差异很大。因此,我们想评估传统的水平斜视手术是否仍然是高度近视的有效选择。患者和方法:对高度近视患者进行回顾性图表回顾,高度近视定义为至少有一只眼睛的球形相当于≥- 6.0 D,并接受了常规水平斜视手术。将外向角转换为正角,总结结果。结果:共分析22例患者(内斜视15例,外斜视7例)。手术前,用交替棱镜盖试验测量的平均偏斜角为33.9棱镜屈光度(PD;距离为13 - 75 PD),近距离为35.3 PD(范围8 - 75 PD)。术后3个月,总平均剂量效应(DE in PD/mm手术)在远处为2.8(标准差[SD] 0.5),在近处为2.9 (SD 0.6)。内斜视患者近、远距离平均DE均为3.0;外斜视的平均DE为近2.5,远2.3。无严重并发症,如巩膜穿孔或视网膜脱离。结论:我们的数据表明,高度近视的常规水平斜视手术是可行的,与巩膜穿孔风险增加无关,并且提供可预测的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Conventional Horizontal Strabismus Surgery Still a Valid Option in High Myopia?

Background: Surgical methods to join extraocular muscles are now often used to reduce the risk of scleral perforation in strabismus surgery, but published results indicate that the outcome is highly variable. We therefore wanted to assess whether conventional horizontal strabismus surgery is still a valid option in high myopia.

Patients and methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with high myopia, defined as a spherical equivalent of ≥ - 6.0 D in at least one eye, and who had undergone conventional horizontal strabismus surgery was performed. Exotropic angles were converted to positive angles to summarize the results.

Results: 22 patients were analyzed (15 corrected for esotropia, 7 for exotropia). Prior to surgery, the mean angle of deviation, measured with the alternate prism cover test, was 33.9 prism diopters (PD; range 13 - 75 PD) at distance and 35.3 PD (range 8 - 75 PD) at near. Three months post-surgery, the overall mean dose effect (DE in PD/mm surgery) was 2.8 (standard deviation [SD] 0.5) at distance and 2.9 (SD 0.6) at near. In esotropia, the mean DE was 3.0 at both distance and near; in exotropia, the mean DE was 2.3 at distance and 2.5 at near. There were no major complications such as scleral perforations or retinal detachment.

Conclusion: Our data show that conventional horizontal strabismus surgery in high myopia is feasible, is not linked to an increased risk of scleral perforation, and offers predictable results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信