[健康兴趣缩短量表的发展]。

Takuya Yamada, Kumi Sugimoto, Yoko Nishizawa, Hirono Ishikawa, Yoshiharu Fukuda
{"title":"[健康兴趣缩短量表的发展]。","authors":"Takuya Yamada, Kumi Sugimoto, Yoko Nishizawa, Hirono Ishikawa, Yoshiharu Fukuda","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Addressing the needs of a population that is indifferent to health is becoming increasingly important. Previous research has developed the \"Interest in Health Scale,\" which assesses the level of interest in health. It comprises three subscales; health consciousness, motivation, and value. This study aimed to enhance the usability of the 12-item Interest in Health Scale by creating a shortened version.Methods Using data from a web survey of 800 participants, factor analysis was conducted on the 12-item Interest in Health Scale to select items for the shortened version. From the factor analysis, two items were selected from each subscale based on their factor loadings to create a 6-item scale, and a 4-item scale was created, excluding two items from the health value subscale. We evaluated the reliability of the newly created shortened version, its correlation with the 12-item version, and its validity through correlations with health literacy (CCHL scale) and lifestyle habits (diet, exercise, alcohol consumption, and smoking).Results Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 and 0.80 for the 6- and 4-item scale, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the 12-item and 6- and 4-item versions were 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. The correlation with health literacy were 0.28, 0.27, and 0.22 for the 12-, 6-, and 4-item versions, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the four lifestyle habits were similar across all the three scales.Conclusion This study created 6- and 4-item versions of the scale with reliability and validity comparable to that of the 12-item version. While the 6-item version, containing all three subscales, is preferable for measuring health interest more easily, the 4-item version, which excludes health value for convenience, can be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Development of the shortened scale for health interest].\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Yamada, Kumi Sugimoto, Yoko Nishizawa, Hirono Ishikawa, Yoshiharu Fukuda\",\"doi\":\"10.11236/jph.24-070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Addressing the needs of a population that is indifferent to health is becoming increasingly important. Previous research has developed the \\\"Interest in Health Scale,\\\" which assesses the level of interest in health. It comprises three subscales; health consciousness, motivation, and value. This study aimed to enhance the usability of the 12-item Interest in Health Scale by creating a shortened version.Methods Using data from a web survey of 800 participants, factor analysis was conducted on the 12-item Interest in Health Scale to select items for the shortened version. From the factor analysis, two items were selected from each subscale based on their factor loadings to create a 6-item scale, and a 4-item scale was created, excluding two items from the health value subscale. We evaluated the reliability of the newly created shortened version, its correlation with the 12-item version, and its validity through correlations with health literacy (CCHL scale) and lifestyle habits (diet, exercise, alcohol consumption, and smoking).Results Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 and 0.80 for the 6- and 4-item scale, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the 12-item and 6- and 4-item versions were 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. The correlation with health literacy were 0.28, 0.27, and 0.22 for the 12-, 6-, and 4-item versions, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the four lifestyle habits were similar across all the three scales.Conclusion This study created 6- and 4-item versions of the scale with reliability and validity comparable to that of the 12-item version. While the 6-item version, containing all three subscales, is preferable for measuring health interest more easily, the 4-item version, which excludes health value for convenience, can be used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

满足对健康漠不关心的人口的需求正变得越来越重要。先前的研究开发了“健康兴趣量表”,用于评估人们对健康的兴趣程度。它包括三个子量表;健康意识、动力和价值。本研究旨在通过简化健康兴趣量表的版本,提高12项健康兴趣量表的可用性。方法利用800名被试的网络调查数据,对健康兴趣量表的12个条目进行因子分析,选择精简版的条目。因子分析中,根据因子的负载量,从每个子量表中选取2个条目,形成6个条目的量表,并形成4个条目的量表,从健康价值子量表中剔除2个条目。我们通过与健康素养(CCHL量表)和生活习惯(饮食、运动、饮酒和吸烟)的相关性来评估新创建的缩短版的信度、与12项版本的相关性以及其效度。结果6项和4项量表的Cronbach's alpha分别为0.72和0.80。12项与6项和4项的相关系数分别为0.94和0.88。12项、6项和4项版本与健康素养的相关性分别为0.28、0.27和0.22。这四种生活习惯的相关系数在所有三个尺度上都是相似的。结论本研究编制了6项和4项量表,其信度和效度与12项量表相当。虽然包含所有三个分量表的6项版本更容易测量健康兴趣,但可以使用为方便而不包括健康值的4项版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Development of the shortened scale for health interest].

Objective Addressing the needs of a population that is indifferent to health is becoming increasingly important. Previous research has developed the "Interest in Health Scale," which assesses the level of interest in health. It comprises three subscales; health consciousness, motivation, and value. This study aimed to enhance the usability of the 12-item Interest in Health Scale by creating a shortened version.Methods Using data from a web survey of 800 participants, factor analysis was conducted on the 12-item Interest in Health Scale to select items for the shortened version. From the factor analysis, two items were selected from each subscale based on their factor loadings to create a 6-item scale, and a 4-item scale was created, excluding two items from the health value subscale. We evaluated the reliability of the newly created shortened version, its correlation with the 12-item version, and its validity through correlations with health literacy (CCHL scale) and lifestyle habits (diet, exercise, alcohol consumption, and smoking).Results Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 and 0.80 for the 6- and 4-item scale, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the 12-item and 6- and 4-item versions were 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. The correlation with health literacy were 0.28, 0.27, and 0.22 for the 12-, 6-, and 4-item versions, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the four lifestyle habits were similar across all the three scales.Conclusion This study created 6- and 4-item versions of the scale with reliability and validity comparable to that of the 12-item version. While the 6-item version, containing all three subscales, is preferable for measuring health interest more easily, the 4-item version, which excludes health value for convenience, can be used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信