跨国公司在新兴市场如何通过社会创新举措体验和实施制度空白

IF 5.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Maximino Matus-Ruiz , Ayse Saka-Helmhout , Jorge Carillo
{"title":"跨国公司在新兴市场如何通过社会创新举措体验和实施制度空白","authors":"Maximino Matus-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Ayse Saka-Helmhout ,&nbsp;Jorge Carillo","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (<em>void experience</em>). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (<em>void enactment</em>) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102382"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets\",\"authors\":\"Maximino Matus-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Ayse Saka-Helmhout ,&nbsp;Jorge Carillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (<em>void experience</em>). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (<em>void enactment</em>) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312400129X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312400129X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了机构在制度空白的社会建构中的作用,而不是将它们主要视为给定的。通过对墨西哥华雷斯的微软公司和阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的任仕达公司的案例研究,我们研究了制度逻辑、空白和填补空白的社会创新实践之间的相互作用。我们发现,嵌入制度逻辑的组织实践可能与社会现实发生冲突,阻碍组织目标的实现(无效经验)。这促使跨国公司尝试嵌入独特逻辑(无效法规)的新颖解决方案,以符合组织的身份。通过概述一个空洞经验和制定的代理模型,我们为国际商业学者提供了一个关于空洞的新视角,并呼吁关注研究新兴市场跨国公司社会创新的制度理论的社会建构主义根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets
This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (void experience). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (void enactment) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信