西班牙家庭佣工职业健康问题中的偏见和排斥

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Jesús Martínez Sevilla , Vanesa Hervías Parejo
{"title":"西班牙家庭佣工职业健康问题中的偏见和排斥","authors":"Jesús Martínez Sevilla ,&nbsp;Vanesa Hervías Parejo","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Domestic work is among the most precarious sectors in the Spanish labour market. In this paper, we aim to explore the exclusions against domestic workers regarding occupational health. To this end, we first review the legal regulation on domestic work, incapacity, occupational illnesses and occupational health and safety, highlighting the biases that exclude domestic workers from social protection for work-related health issues in the Spanish context. We then address how these biases apply in practice by analysing rulings by the High Court of Justice of Andalusia on incapacity in which the complainants are domestic workers. We conclude that the exclusion of domestic workers from the social protection system in relation to occupational health results from the combination of its lack of legal definition and the authorities' implicit biases against it. This necessitates a combination of legal changes and policies to counteract implicit bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 103040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biases and exclusions in the occupational health issues of domestic workers in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Martínez Sevilla ,&nbsp;Vanesa Hervías Parejo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.103040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Domestic work is among the most precarious sectors in the Spanish labour market. In this paper, we aim to explore the exclusions against domestic workers regarding occupational health. To this end, we first review the legal regulation on domestic work, incapacity, occupational illnesses and occupational health and safety, highlighting the biases that exclude domestic workers from social protection for work-related health issues in the Spanish context. We then address how these biases apply in practice by analysing rulings by the High Court of Justice of Andalusia on incapacity in which the complainants are domestic workers. We conclude that the exclusion of domestic workers from the social protection system in relation to occupational health results from the combination of its lack of legal definition and the authorities' implicit biases against it. This necessitates a combination of legal changes and policies to counteract implicit bias.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027753952400178X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027753952400178X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家政工作是西班牙劳动力市场上最不稳定的行业之一。在本文中,我们的目的是探讨排斥家政工人在职业健康方面。为此,我们首先审查了关于家务劳动、丧失工作能力、职业病和职业健康与安全的法律规定,强调了在西班牙情况下,将家庭佣工排除在与工作有关的健康问题的社会保护之外的偏见。然后,我们通过分析安达卢西亚高等法院关于申诉人是家庭工人的丧失工作能力的裁决,来解决这些偏见在实践中如何适用。我们的结论是,将家庭佣工排除在与职业健康有关的社会保护体系之外,是由于缺乏法律定义和当局对其的隐性偏见的综合结果。这需要法律改革和政策相结合,以抵消隐性偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biases and exclusions in the occupational health issues of domestic workers in Spain
Domestic work is among the most precarious sectors in the Spanish labour market. In this paper, we aim to explore the exclusions against domestic workers regarding occupational health. To this end, we first review the legal regulation on domestic work, incapacity, occupational illnesses and occupational health and safety, highlighting the biases that exclude domestic workers from social protection for work-related health issues in the Spanish context. We then address how these biases apply in practice by analysing rulings by the High Court of Justice of Andalusia on incapacity in which the complainants are domestic workers. We conclude that the exclusion of domestic workers from the social protection system in relation to occupational health results from the combination of its lack of legal definition and the authorities' implicit biases against it. This necessitates a combination of legal changes and policies to counteract implicit bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信