效率、安全性和传播:与实用功能评估相关的研究和实践的考虑

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Michael P. Kranak, Adam M. Briggs
{"title":"效率、安全性和传播:与实用功能评估相关的研究和实践的考虑","authors":"Michael P. Kranak,&nbsp;Adam M. Briggs","doi":"10.1002/bin.2072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Researchers have developed and evaluated procedural modifications to the functional analysis (FA) to improve its efficiency and safety while maintaining its precision. A contemporary FA modification is the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) or practical functional assessment (PFA). Nearly all of the extant dissemination efforts related to the IISCA/PFA support this approach, with little attention to its drawbacks and limitations. Further, the IISCA/PFA has been widely disseminated and seems to have been readily adopted by many clinicians as the nonpareil FA. However, researchers and clinicians should be aware of several lingering issues and considerations to have a more balanced understanding of the IISCA/PFA (e.g., the conditions under which this approach should be considered). Accordingly, we outline the strengths of the IISCA/PFA, considerations surrounding various factors (e.g., the dissemination tactics), ideas for future research, and how the discussion on this topic should move forward.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency, Safety, and Dissemination: Considerations for Research and Practice Related to the Practical Functional Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Kranak,&nbsp;Adam M. Briggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.2072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Researchers have developed and evaluated procedural modifications to the functional analysis (FA) to improve its efficiency and safety while maintaining its precision. A contemporary FA modification is the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) or practical functional assessment (PFA). Nearly all of the extant dissemination efforts related to the IISCA/PFA support this approach, with little attention to its drawbacks and limitations. Further, the IISCA/PFA has been widely disseminated and seems to have been readily adopted by many clinicians as the nonpareil FA. However, researchers and clinicians should be aware of several lingering issues and considerations to have a more balanced understanding of the IISCA/PFA (e.g., the conditions under which this approach should be considered). Accordingly, we outline the strengths of the IISCA/PFA, considerations surrounding various factors (e.g., the dissemination tactics), ideas for future research, and how the discussion on this topic should move forward.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.2072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员开发并评估了功能分析(FA)的程序修改,以提高其效率和安全性,同时保持其准确性。当代FA的一种改进是基于访谈的综合偶然性分析(IISCA)或实用功能评估(PFA)。几乎所有现存的传播工作都支持这种方法,很少注意到它的缺点和局限性。此外,IISCA/PFA已被广泛传播,似乎已被许多临床医生欣然采用为非平行FA。然而,研究人员和临床医生应该意识到一些挥之不去的问题和考虑因素,以便对IISCA/PFA有一个更平衡的理解(例如,应该考虑这种方法的条件)。因此,我们概述了IISCA/PFA的优势,围绕各种因素的考虑(例如,传播策略),未来研究的想法,以及如何推进这一主题的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency, Safety, and Dissemination: Considerations for Research and Practice Related to the Practical Functional Assessment

Researchers have developed and evaluated procedural modifications to the functional analysis (FA) to improve its efficiency and safety while maintaining its precision. A contemporary FA modification is the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA) or practical functional assessment (PFA). Nearly all of the extant dissemination efforts related to the IISCA/PFA support this approach, with little attention to its drawbacks and limitations. Further, the IISCA/PFA has been widely disseminated and seems to have been readily adopted by many clinicians as the nonpareil FA. However, researchers and clinicians should be aware of several lingering issues and considerations to have a more balanced understanding of the IISCA/PFA (e.g., the conditions under which this approach should be considered). Accordingly, we outline the strengths of the IISCA/PFA, considerations surrounding various factors (e.g., the dissemination tactics), ideas for future research, and how the discussion on this topic should move forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Interventions
Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信