Affan Yasin, Rubia Fatima, Ira Puspitasari, Zheng JiangBin, Zhi Li
{"title":"提高研究新手文献质量评估技能:基于协作卡片的学习方法","authors":"Affan Yasin, Rubia Fatima, Ira Puspitasari, Zheng JiangBin, Zhi Li","doi":"10.1002/smr.2753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Assessing the quality and credibility of research is crucial across disciplines. However, training early career scholars in systematic quality appraisal poses challenges. The rise of online grey literature increases the need for nuanced evaluation capabilities. This study aims to impart basic literature quality assessment knowledge in early career software engineering researchers using an interactive card-based learning activity. The PRISMA abstract quality checklist was adapted into a physical card deck. Sixteen novice researchers participated in a session using the cards to collaborate, discuss, and analyze a sample review paper abstract based on structured criteria. Quantitative feedback was gathered. Survey results indicated the card activity positively enhanced perceived understanding of quality principles, engagement, and assessment skills. Open-ended feedback highlighted cards improved focus, interactivity, and peer exchanges. This preliminary study provides encouraging evidence that a customized card-based approach can effectively instill foundational skills for assessing abstract quality while increasing motivation and enjoyment. Further research should evaluate long-term retention and optimal instructional design parameters.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Literature Quality Assessment Skill in Novice Researchers: A Collaborative Card-Based Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"Affan Yasin, Rubia Fatima, Ira Puspitasari, Zheng JiangBin, Zhi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smr.2753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Assessing the quality and credibility of research is crucial across disciplines. However, training early career scholars in systematic quality appraisal poses challenges. The rise of online grey literature increases the need for nuanced evaluation capabilities. This study aims to impart basic literature quality assessment knowledge in early career software engineering researchers using an interactive card-based learning activity. The PRISMA abstract quality checklist was adapted into a physical card deck. Sixteen novice researchers participated in a session using the cards to collaborate, discuss, and analyze a sample review paper abstract based on structured criteria. Quantitative feedback was gathered. Survey results indicated the card activity positively enhanced perceived understanding of quality principles, engagement, and assessment skills. Open-ended feedback highlighted cards improved focus, interactivity, and peer exchanges. This preliminary study provides encouraging evidence that a customized card-based approach can effectively instill foundational skills for assessing abstract quality while increasing motivation and enjoyment. Further research should evaluate long-term retention and optimal instructional design parameters.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.2753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Literature Quality Assessment Skill in Novice Researchers: A Collaborative Card-Based Learning Approach
Assessing the quality and credibility of research is crucial across disciplines. However, training early career scholars in systematic quality appraisal poses challenges. The rise of online grey literature increases the need for nuanced evaluation capabilities. This study aims to impart basic literature quality assessment knowledge in early career software engineering researchers using an interactive card-based learning activity. The PRISMA abstract quality checklist was adapted into a physical card deck. Sixteen novice researchers participated in a session using the cards to collaborate, discuss, and analyze a sample review paper abstract based on structured criteria. Quantitative feedback was gathered. Survey results indicated the card activity positively enhanced perceived understanding of quality principles, engagement, and assessment skills. Open-ended feedback highlighted cards improved focus, interactivity, and peer exchanges. This preliminary study provides encouraging evidence that a customized card-based approach can effectively instill foundational skills for assessing abstract quality while increasing motivation and enjoyment. Further research should evaluate long-term retention and optimal instructional design parameters.