环数是否影响蓄胡子咽成形术的结果?两种技术的比较研究

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Marina Carrasco Llatas , Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca , Elena González Turienzo , Miguel Martínez Moreno , Felipe Domínguez Celis , Giovanni Cammaroto , Claudio Vicini
{"title":"环数是否影响蓄胡子咽成形术的结果?两种技术的比较研究","authors":"Marina Carrasco Llatas ,&nbsp;Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca ,&nbsp;Elena González Turienzo ,&nbsp;Miguel Martínez Moreno ,&nbsp;Felipe Domínguez Celis ,&nbsp;Giovanni Cammaroto ,&nbsp;Claudio Vicini","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI &lt;<!--> <!-->10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"76 1","pages":"Pages 25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Afecta el número de bucles a los resultados de las faringoplastias barbadas? Un estudio comparativo entre dos técnicas\",\"authors\":\"Marina Carrasco Llatas ,&nbsp;Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca ,&nbsp;Elena González Turienzo ,&nbsp;Miguel Martínez Moreno ,&nbsp;Felipe Domínguez Celis ,&nbsp;Giovanni Cammaroto ,&nbsp;Claudio Vicini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI &lt;<!--> <!-->10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651924000967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651924000967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在睡眠呼吸暂停手术中,使用倒钩缝合线进行咽成形术是一种新的趋势,但由于不同的技术,其短期效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是分析在两个不同的中心使用不同的倒钩咽成形术的倒钩缝合的手术结果。材料和方法本研究是一项多中心回顾性研究,研究对象为接受手术治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者,所有患者均采用传统或改良技术进行咽成形术,该技术可能与其他手术技术相关,也可能与其他手术技术无关。通过单变量和多变量统计分析来评估这些手术技术与手术成功率和不同描述变量的关系。结果最终样本量为126例。术后AHI <的手术成功率为39.7%;10/h,根据Sher标准成功率为51.6%。在多变量分析后,如年龄、ODI或鼻腔手术等其他因素,改良的倒钩咽成形术的成功率更高。结论非切除性咽成形术加倒钩缝合是治疗部分OSA患者的一种有效方法,经典方法与改良方法术后效果均较好,手术成功率无差异。需要更多的研究来评估这两种技术在更多同质群体中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
¿Afecta el número de bucles a los resultados de las faringoplastias barbadas? Un estudio comparativo entre dos técnicas

Introduction

The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures with different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques.

Material and methods

This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing surgery, all of whom underwent pharyngoplasty with barbed suture using a classic or modified technique, which may or may not be associated with other surgical techniques. A univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess the relationship of these surgical techniques with surgical success and with different descriptive variables.

Results

The final sample size was 126 patients. A surgical success rate of 39.7% was obtained for a postoperative AHI < 10/h and a 51.6% success rate according to Sher's criteria. A greater proportion of success was observed in the modified barbed pharyngoplasty technique that was not maintained after the multivariate analysis, as with other factors such as age, ODI or the presence of nasal surgery.

Conclusion

Non-resective pharyngoplasty with barbed sutures is an effective technique for the treatment of OSA in selected patients, with both the classic technique and the modified alternatives having good postoperative results, with no differences observed in relation to surgical success between both. More studies are necessary to evaluate the differences between both techniques in more homogeneous groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信