良性甲状腺结节的射频消融:来自单一中心的10年随访结果

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jae Ho Shin, Minkook Seo, Min Kyoung Lee, So Lyung Jung
{"title":"良性甲状腺结节的射频消融:来自单一中心的10年随访结果","authors":"Jae Ho Shin, Minkook Seo, Min Kyoung Lee, So Lyung Jung","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2024.0599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, emphasizing single-session RFA, and identify the factors associated with cases requiring additional RFA sessions to achieve a comparable volume reduction rates (VRR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated benign thyroid nodules treated with RFA between 2008 and 2018. Treatment efficacy at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups was analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis comparing technique efficacy, such as the final VRR, between the single- and multi-session RFA groups was performed. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 nodules from 237 patients (age: 46.3 ± 15.0 years; female: 210/237 [88.6%]) were included. Of these, 60 were analyzed for the 5-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration ± standard deviation: 5.8 ± 0.4 years) and 29 for the 10-year follow-up (10.9 ± 0.9 years). Single-session RFA showed a median VRR of 95.7% (5th year) and 98.8% (10th year), while multi-session RFA showed comparable median VRRs of 97.4% (5th year) and 96.9% (10th year). The vascularity type, demographic factors, nodular components, and locations did not significantly differ between the single-session and multi-session RFA groups. However, nodules with pre-RFA volume <10 mL were more prevalent in the single-session RFA group than in the multi-session RFA group (5th year: 64.3% [18/28] vs. 34.4% [11/32], <i>P</i> = 0.040; 10th year: 75.0% [12/16] vs. 23.1% [3/13], <i>P</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-session RFA may be sufficient for achieving adequate volume reduction during long-term follow-up for small-volume benign thyroid nodules. A high VRR was maintained regardless of the nodular component, location, demographic factors, or vascularity type. However, large-volume nodules may require multiple RFA sessions to achieve a comparable VRR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"26 2","pages":"193-203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: 10-Year Follow-Up Results From a Single Center.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Ho Shin, Minkook Seo, Min Kyoung Lee, So Lyung Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/kjr.2024.0599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, emphasizing single-session RFA, and identify the factors associated with cases requiring additional RFA sessions to achieve a comparable volume reduction rates (VRR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated benign thyroid nodules treated with RFA between 2008 and 2018. Treatment efficacy at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups was analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis comparing technique efficacy, such as the final VRR, between the single- and multi-session RFA groups was performed. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 267 nodules from 237 patients (age: 46.3 ± 15.0 years; female: 210/237 [88.6%]) were included. Of these, 60 were analyzed for the 5-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration ± standard deviation: 5.8 ± 0.4 years) and 29 for the 10-year follow-up (10.9 ± 0.9 years). Single-session RFA showed a median VRR of 95.7% (5th year) and 98.8% (10th year), while multi-session RFA showed comparable median VRRs of 97.4% (5th year) and 96.9% (10th year). The vascularity type, demographic factors, nodular components, and locations did not significantly differ between the single-session and multi-session RFA groups. However, nodules with pre-RFA volume <10 mL were more prevalent in the single-session RFA group than in the multi-session RFA group (5th year: 64.3% [18/28] vs. 34.4% [11/32], <i>P</i> = 0.040; 10th year: 75.0% [12/16] vs. 23.1% [3/13], <i>P</i> = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-session RFA may be sufficient for achieving adequate volume reduction during long-term follow-up for small-volume benign thyroid nodules. A high VRR was maintained regardless of the nodular component, location, demographic factors, or vascularity type. However, large-volume nodules may require multiple RFA sessions to achieve a comparable VRR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"193-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794290/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:射频消融(RFA)治疗良性甲状腺结节的长期疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估长期疗效,强调单次RFA,并确定与需要额外RFA治疗以达到相当体积减少率(VRR)的病例相关的因素。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估2008年至2018年间RFA治疗的良性甲状腺结节。分析5年和10年随访的治疗效果。此外,还进行了亚组分析,比较了单次和多次RFA组之间的技术疗效,如最终VRR。连续变量分析采用双样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验,分类变量分析采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。结果:237例患者共267个结节(年龄:46.3±15.0岁;女性:210/237(88.6%)。其中60例为5年随访(平均随访时间±标准差:5.8±0.4年),29例为10年随访(10.9±0.9年)。单次RFA的中位VRR为95.7%(第5年)和98.8%(第10年),而多次RFA的中位VRR为97.4%(第5年)和96.9%(第10年)。血管类型、人口统计学因素、结节成分和位置在单次RFA组和多次RFA组之间没有显著差异。而术前rfa体积P = 0.040的结节;第十年:75.0%(12/16)和23.1% (3/13),P = 0.016)。结论:在小体积良性甲状腺结节的长期随访中,单次射频消融可能足以达到适当的体积缩小。无论结节成分、位置、人口统计学因素或血管类型如何,均保持较高的VRR。然而,大容量结节可能需要多个RFA会话来实现可比较的VRR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiofrequency Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules: 10-Year Follow-Up Results From a Single Center.

Objective: The long-term efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy, emphasizing single-session RFA, and identify the factors associated with cases requiring additional RFA sessions to achieve a comparable volume reduction rates (VRR).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated benign thyroid nodules treated with RFA between 2008 and 2018. Treatment efficacy at the 5- and 10-year follow-ups was analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analysis comparing technique efficacy, such as the final VRR, between the single- and multi-session RFA groups was performed. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

Results: A total of 267 nodules from 237 patients (age: 46.3 ± 15.0 years; female: 210/237 [88.6%]) were included. Of these, 60 were analyzed for the 5-year follow-up (mean follow-up duration ± standard deviation: 5.8 ± 0.4 years) and 29 for the 10-year follow-up (10.9 ± 0.9 years). Single-session RFA showed a median VRR of 95.7% (5th year) and 98.8% (10th year), while multi-session RFA showed comparable median VRRs of 97.4% (5th year) and 96.9% (10th year). The vascularity type, demographic factors, nodular components, and locations did not significantly differ between the single-session and multi-session RFA groups. However, nodules with pre-RFA volume <10 mL were more prevalent in the single-session RFA group than in the multi-session RFA group (5th year: 64.3% [18/28] vs. 34.4% [11/32], P = 0.040; 10th year: 75.0% [12/16] vs. 23.1% [3/13], P = 0.016).

Conclusion: Single-session RFA may be sufficient for achieving adequate volume reduction during long-term follow-up for small-volume benign thyroid nodules. A high VRR was maintained regardless of the nodular component, location, demographic factors, or vascularity type. However, large-volume nodules may require multiple RFA sessions to achieve a comparable VRR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信