{"title":"使用视觉类比量表进行听觉感知评估的严重程度临界范围。","authors":"Patrick R Walden","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective, observational analytic, cross-sectional research study aimed to establish cut-off scores for categorizing the severity of voice qualities on a 100-unit visual analog scale (VAS). The study investigated the VAS cut-off ranges corresponding to auditory-perceptual ratings of normal, mild, moderate, and severe severities from the GRBAS scale for overall severity, breathiness, roughness, and strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized voice samples and ratings from the Perceptual Voice Qualities Database (PVQD). The database contains 296 audio samples, including sustained vowels and sentences, rated by 19 experienced voice clinicians. The raters used a 100-point VAS and the GRBAS scale to evaluate voice qualities. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were calculated to determine cut-off scores for each severity category, balancing a 90% sensitivity with a 10% allowable false-positive categorization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cut-off ranges were established for overall severity, breathiness, and roughness, demonstrating similar values across severities. The ranges were: Overall severity: normal (0-15), mild (16-39), moderate (40-69), severe (70-100). Breathiness: normal (0-14), mild (15-34), moderate (35-68), severe (69-100). Roughness: normal (0-13), mild (14-37), moderate (38-65), severe (66-100). For strain, only the normal range (0-15) could be determined with statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided clinically relevant cut-off values for severity categories on a VAS, enhancing communication with patients and facilitating the use of both sensitive and specific categorical measures in voice evaluation. The findings contribute to a more standardized and objective assessment of voice quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severity Cut-Off Ranges for Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation Using Visual Analog Scales.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick R Walden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective, observational analytic, cross-sectional research study aimed to establish cut-off scores for categorizing the severity of voice qualities on a 100-unit visual analog scale (VAS). The study investigated the VAS cut-off ranges corresponding to auditory-perceptual ratings of normal, mild, moderate, and severe severities from the GRBAS scale for overall severity, breathiness, roughness, and strain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized voice samples and ratings from the Perceptual Voice Qualities Database (PVQD). The database contains 296 audio samples, including sustained vowels and sentences, rated by 19 experienced voice clinicians. The raters used a 100-point VAS and the GRBAS scale to evaluate voice qualities. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were calculated to determine cut-off scores for each severity category, balancing a 90% sensitivity with a 10% allowable false-positive categorization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cut-off ranges were established for overall severity, breathiness, and roughness, demonstrating similar values across severities. The ranges were: Overall severity: normal (0-15), mild (16-39), moderate (40-69), severe (70-100). Breathiness: normal (0-14), mild (15-34), moderate (35-68), severe (69-100). Roughness: normal (0-13), mild (14-37), moderate (38-65), severe (66-100). For strain, only the normal range (0-15) could be determined with statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provided clinically relevant cut-off values for severity categories on a VAS, enhancing communication with patients and facilitating the use of both sensitive and specific categorical measures in voice evaluation. The findings contribute to a more standardized and objective assessment of voice quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.01.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Severity Cut-Off Ranges for Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation Using Visual Analog Scales.
Objectives: This retrospective, observational analytic, cross-sectional research study aimed to establish cut-off scores for categorizing the severity of voice qualities on a 100-unit visual analog scale (VAS). The study investigated the VAS cut-off ranges corresponding to auditory-perceptual ratings of normal, mild, moderate, and severe severities from the GRBAS scale for overall severity, breathiness, roughness, and strain.
Methods: The study utilized voice samples and ratings from the Perceptual Voice Qualities Database (PVQD). The database contains 296 audio samples, including sustained vowels and sentences, rated by 19 experienced voice clinicians. The raters used a 100-point VAS and the GRBAS scale to evaluate voice qualities. Receiver operator curves (ROC) were calculated to determine cut-off scores for each severity category, balancing a 90% sensitivity with a 10% allowable false-positive categorization.
Results: Cut-off ranges were established for overall severity, breathiness, and roughness, demonstrating similar values across severities. The ranges were: Overall severity: normal (0-15), mild (16-39), moderate (40-69), severe (70-100). Breathiness: normal (0-14), mild (15-34), moderate (35-68), severe (69-100). Roughness: normal (0-13), mild (14-37), moderate (38-65), severe (66-100). For strain, only the normal range (0-15) could be determined with statistical significance.
Conclusions: This study provided clinically relevant cut-off values for severity categories on a VAS, enhancing communication with patients and facilitating the use of both sensitive and specific categorical measures in voice evaluation. The findings contribute to a more standardized and objective assessment of voice quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.