Guy Froyen, Pieter-Jan Volders, Ellen Geerdens, Severine Berden, Joni Van der Meulen, Aaron De Cock, Stefanie Vermeire, Jacques Van Huysse, Marie de Barsy, Gabriela Beniuga, Wendy W J de Leng, Anne M L Jansen, Imke Demers, Zeliha Ozgur, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Ernst-Jan M Speel, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Brigitte Maes
{"title":"实体肿瘤的综合基因组谱分析与临床诊断广泛分析的新分析。","authors":"Guy Froyen, Pieter-Jan Volders, Ellen Geerdens, Severine Berden, Joni Van der Meulen, Aaron De Cock, Stefanie Vermeire, Jacques Van Huysse, Marie de Barsy, Gabriela Beniuga, Wendy W J de Leng, Anne M L Jansen, Imke Demers, Zeliha Ozgur, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Ernst-Jan M Speel, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Brigitte Maes","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.13812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Somatic multigene analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely integrated in medical oncology for clinical decision-making. However, with the fast-growing number of recommended and required genes as well as pan-cancer biomarkers, small panels have become vastly insufficient. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is, thus, required to screen for clinically relevant markers. In this multicentric study, we report on an extensive analysis across seven centers comparing the results of the novel OncoDEEP CGP assay with the diagnostically validated TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) kit on 250 samples. Overall concordance was 90% for clinically relevant gene variants and >96% for more complex biomarkers. Agreement for fusion detection was 94% for the 11 overlapping clinically actionable driver genes. The higher coverage uniformity of OncoDEEP compared to TSO500 allows users to pool more samples per sequencing run. Tertiary data analysis, including reporting, is integrated in the OncoDEEP solution, whereas this is an add-on for TSO500. Finally, we showed that, analytically, the OncoDEEP panel performs well, thereby advocating its use for CGP of solid tumors in diagnostic laboratories, providing an all-in-one solution for optimal patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1810"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors with a novel assay for broad analysis in clinical diagnostics.\",\"authors\":\"Guy Froyen, Pieter-Jan Volders, Ellen Geerdens, Severine Berden, Joni Van der Meulen, Aaron De Cock, Stefanie Vermeire, Jacques Van Huysse, Marie de Barsy, Gabriela Beniuga, Wendy W J de Leng, Anne M L Jansen, Imke Demers, Zeliha Ozgur, Hendrikus Jan Dubbink, Ernst-Jan M Speel, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Brigitte Maes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1878-0261.13812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Somatic multigene analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely integrated in medical oncology for clinical decision-making. However, with the fast-growing number of recommended and required genes as well as pan-cancer biomarkers, small panels have become vastly insufficient. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is, thus, required to screen for clinically relevant markers. In this multicentric study, we report on an extensive analysis across seven centers comparing the results of the novel OncoDEEP CGP assay with the diagnostically validated TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) kit on 250 samples. Overall concordance was 90% for clinically relevant gene variants and >96% for more complex biomarkers. Agreement for fusion detection was 94% for the 11 overlapping clinically actionable driver genes. The higher coverage uniformity of OncoDEEP compared to TSO500 allows users to pool more samples per sequencing run. Tertiary data analysis, including reporting, is integrated in the OncoDEEP solution, whereas this is an add-on for TSO500. Finally, we showed that, analytically, the OncoDEEP panel performs well, thereby advocating its use for CGP of solid tumors in diagnostic laboratories, providing an all-in-one solution for optimal patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1797-1810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13812\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of comprehensive genomic profiling of solid tumors with a novel assay for broad analysis in clinical diagnostics.
Somatic multigene analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is routinely integrated in medical oncology for clinical decision-making. However, with the fast-growing number of recommended and required genes as well as pan-cancer biomarkers, small panels have become vastly insufficient. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is, thus, required to screen for clinically relevant markers. In this multicentric study, we report on an extensive analysis across seven centers comparing the results of the novel OncoDEEP CGP assay with the diagnostically validated TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) kit on 250 samples. Overall concordance was 90% for clinically relevant gene variants and >96% for more complex biomarkers. Agreement for fusion detection was 94% for the 11 overlapping clinically actionable driver genes. The higher coverage uniformity of OncoDEEP compared to TSO500 allows users to pool more samples per sequencing run. Tertiary data analysis, including reporting, is integrated in the OncoDEEP solution, whereas this is an add-on for TSO500. Finally, we showed that, analytically, the OncoDEEP panel performs well, thereby advocating its use for CGP of solid tumors in diagnostic laboratories, providing an all-in-one solution for optimal patient management.
Molecular OncologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles.
The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.