燃烧甘蔗产生的空气污染对健康的不利影响:对观测和实验证据的范围审查。

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1289/EHP14456
Andres Manrique, Kayan Clarke, Sarah Bisesi, Farah A Arosemena, Eric S Coker, Tara Sabo-Attwood
{"title":"燃烧甘蔗产生的空气污染对健康的不利影响:对观测和实验证据的范围审查。","authors":"Andres Manrique, Kayan Clarke, Sarah Bisesi, Farah A Arosemena, Eric S Coker, Tara Sabo-Attwood","doi":"10.1289/EHP14456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugarcane burning is an agricultural practice that is implemented to increase sugar yields. However, sugarcane burning produces air pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the defined exposures and health effects associated with sugarcane burning and identifies research gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web-of-Science to identify peer-reviewed literature on health and exposure investigations associated with air pollution from burning sugarcane. Studies were eligible if they included both an air pollution measurement and a health outcome assessment in human workers and surrounding communities or animal studies associated with sugarcane burning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 studies passed our inclusion criteria, including 19 observational and five experimental studies. All observational studies were conducted in Brazil or the United States with the majority focused on respiratory (65%, 15/24), cardiovascular (13% 3/24), and renal (13%, 3/24) health outcomes. The most frequently assessed air pollutants were particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter <math><mo>≤</mo><mn>2.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></math> (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mi>PM</mi></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>2.5</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>) and with aerodynamic diameter <math><mo>≤</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></math> (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mi>PM</mi></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>)] and total suspended particulates (TSP). Of the observational studies, 42% (8/19) were prospective cohorts, and 58% (11/19) employed an ecological design and applied variable exposure assessment methods. The experimental studies all used rodent models with varied exposure routes and pollutants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review supports a well-documented link between air pollution from sugarcane burning and adverse health effects in workers and neighboring communities with respiratory, renal, and cardiovascular health effects; however, several knowledge gaps were identified, including the need for expansion of studies geographically, application of more advanced exposure science to characterize and quantify sugarcane emission components, probing of emerging health effects (i.e., kidney disease) and associated biomarkers, and evaluation of vulnerable populations that neighbor sugarcane operations. Furthermore, pairing exposure measurements and health assessments in the same study would increase our knowledge and better inform policies to improve the health of workers and communities impacted by sugarcane burning. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 1","pages":"16002"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adverse Health Effects of Air Pollution from Sugarcane Burning: A Scoping Review of Observational and Experimental Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Andres Manrique, Kayan Clarke, Sarah Bisesi, Farah A Arosemena, Eric S Coker, Tara Sabo-Attwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP14456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugarcane burning is an agricultural practice that is implemented to increase sugar yields. However, sugarcane burning produces air pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the defined exposures and health effects associated with sugarcane burning and identifies research gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web-of-Science to identify peer-reviewed literature on health and exposure investigations associated with air pollution from burning sugarcane. Studies were eligible if they included both an air pollution measurement and a health outcome assessment in human workers and surrounding communities or animal studies associated with sugarcane burning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 studies passed our inclusion criteria, including 19 observational and five experimental studies. All observational studies were conducted in Brazil or the United States with the majority focused on respiratory (65%, 15/24), cardiovascular (13% 3/24), and renal (13%, 3/24) health outcomes. The most frequently assessed air pollutants were particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter <math><mo>≤</mo><mn>2.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></math> (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mi>PM</mi></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>2.5</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>) and with aerodynamic diameter <math><mo>≤</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>μ</mi><mi>m</mi></math> (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mrow><mi>PM</mi></mrow></mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>)] and total suspended particulates (TSP). Of the observational studies, 42% (8/19) were prospective cohorts, and 58% (11/19) employed an ecological design and applied variable exposure assessment methods. The experimental studies all used rodent models with varied exposure routes and pollutants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This review supports a well-documented link between air pollution from sugarcane burning and adverse health effects in workers and neighboring communities with respiratory, renal, and cardiovascular health effects; however, several knowledge gaps were identified, including the need for expansion of studies geographically, application of more advanced exposure science to characterize and quantify sugarcane emission components, probing of emerging health effects (i.e., kidney disease) and associated biomarkers, and evaluation of vulnerable populations that neighbor sugarcane operations. Furthermore, pairing exposure measurements and health assessments in the same study would increase our knowledge and better inform policies to improve the health of workers and communities impacted by sugarcane burning. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"16002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甘蔗焚烧是一种提高糖产量的农业实践。然而,甘蔗燃烧产生与不利健康结果相关的空气污染物。本综述总结了目前对与甘蔗燃烧相关的明确暴露和健康影响的了解,并指出了研究空白。方法:使用PubMed、Scopus和Web-of-Science进行范围审查,以确定与燃烧甘蔗引起的空气污染有关的健康和暴露调查的同行评议文献。如果研究包括空气污染测量和对人类工人和周围社区的健康结果评估,或与甘蔗燃烧有关的动物研究,则符合条件。结果:共有24项研究符合我们的纳入标准,其中观察性研究19项,实验性研究5项。所有观察性研究均在巴西或美国进行,大多数集中在呼吸(65%,15/24)、心血管(13%,3/24)和肾脏(13%,3/24)健康结局。最常被评估的空气污染物是颗粒物(空气动力直径≤2.5μm (PM2.5)和空气动力直径≤10μm (PM10))和总悬浮颗粒物(TSP)。在观察性研究中,42%(8/19)为前瞻性队列,58%(11/19)采用生态设计并应用可变暴露评估方法。实验研究都使用了具有不同暴露途径和污染物的啮齿动物模型。讨论:本综述支持甘蔗燃烧产生的空气污染与工人和邻近社区的呼吸、肾脏和心血管健康不良影响之间的良好联系;然而,确定了若干知识空白,包括需要在地理上扩大研究,应用更先进的暴露科学来表征和量化甘蔗排放成分,探索新出现的健康影响(即肾病)和相关生物标志物,以及评估甘蔗作业附近的弱势群体。此外,在同一项研究中结合接触测量和健康评估将增加我们的知识,并更好地为政策提供信息,以改善受甘蔗燃烧影响的工人和社区的健康。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Adverse Health Effects of Air Pollution from Sugarcane Burning: A Scoping Review of Observational and Experimental Evidence.

Background: Sugarcane burning is an agricultural practice that is implemented to increase sugar yields. However, sugarcane burning produces air pollutants associated with adverse health outcomes. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the defined exposures and health effects associated with sugarcane burning and identifies research gaps.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web-of-Science to identify peer-reviewed literature on health and exposure investigations associated with air pollution from burning sugarcane. Studies were eligible if they included both an air pollution measurement and a health outcome assessment in human workers and surrounding communities or animal studies associated with sugarcane burning.

Results: A total of 24 studies passed our inclusion criteria, including 19 observational and five experimental studies. All observational studies were conducted in Brazil or the United States with the majority focused on respiratory (65%, 15/24), cardiovascular (13% 3/24), and renal (13%, 3/24) health outcomes. The most frequently assessed air pollutants were particulate matter [with aerodynamic diameter 2.5μm (PM2.5) and with aerodynamic diameter 10μm (PM10)] and total suspended particulates (TSP). Of the observational studies, 42% (8/19) were prospective cohorts, and 58% (11/19) employed an ecological design and applied variable exposure assessment methods. The experimental studies all used rodent models with varied exposure routes and pollutants.

Discussion: This review supports a well-documented link between air pollution from sugarcane burning and adverse health effects in workers and neighboring communities with respiratory, renal, and cardiovascular health effects; however, several knowledge gaps were identified, including the need for expansion of studies geographically, application of more advanced exposure science to characterize and quantify sugarcane emission components, probing of emerging health effects (i.e., kidney disease) and associated biomarkers, and evaluation of vulnerable populations that neighbor sugarcane operations. Furthermore, pairing exposure measurements and health assessments in the same study would increase our knowledge and better inform policies to improve the health of workers and communities impacted by sugarcane burning. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14456.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信