动机构念:真实的,有因果关系的,不是心理建构的。

IF 16.6 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Andrea Scarantino
{"title":"动机构念:真实的,有因果关系的,不是心理建构的。","authors":"Andrea Scarantino","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X24000530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Murayama and Jach criticize the use of high-level motivational constructs in psychology, urging psychologists to \"unpack\" the black box. These constructs are alleged to be \"psychological constructions\" with no causal powers of their own. I argue that this view is mistaken, and that high-level motivational constructs are causal even when unpacked in terms of underlying computational, algorithmic, and implementational processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":"48 ","pages":"e42"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational constructs: Real, causally powerful, not psychologically constructed.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Scarantino\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0140525X24000530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Murayama and Jach criticize the use of high-level motivational constructs in psychology, urging psychologists to \\\"unpack\\\" the black box. These constructs are alleged to be \\\"psychological constructions\\\" with no causal powers of their own. I argue that this view is mistaken, and that high-level motivational constructs are causal even when unpacked in terms of underlying computational, algorithmic, and implementational processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"e42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000530\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000530","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Murayama和Jach批评在心理学中使用高级动机结构,敦促心理学家“打开”黑盒子。这些构念被认为是“心理构念”,本身没有因果关系。我认为这种观点是错误的,即使从底层的计算、算法和实现过程来看,高层次的动机结构也是因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivational constructs: Real, causally powerful, not psychologically constructed.

Murayama and Jach criticize the use of high-level motivational constructs in psychology, urging psychologists to "unpack" the black box. These constructs are alleged to be "psychological constructions" with no causal powers of their own. I argue that this view is mistaken, and that high-level motivational constructs are causal even when unpacked in terms of underlying computational, algorithmic, and implementational processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信