Jae-Jun Kim, Simone N. T. Kurial, Pervinder K. Choksi, Miguel Nunez, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Jan Bartel, Julia Driscoll, Chris L. Her, Simaron Dhillon, William Yue, Abhishek Murti, Tin Mao, Julian N. Ramos, Amita Tiyaboonchai, Markus Grompe, Aras N. Mattis, Shareef M. Syed, Bruce M. Wang, Jacquelyn J. Maher, Garrett R. Roll, Holger Willenbring
{"title":"AAV capsid prioritization in normal and steatotic human livers maintained by machine perfusion","authors":"Jae-Jun Kim, Simone N. T. Kurial, Pervinder K. Choksi, Miguel Nunez, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Jan Bartel, Julia Driscoll, Chris L. Her, Simaron Dhillon, William Yue, Abhishek Murti, Tin Mao, Julian N. Ramos, Amita Tiyaboonchai, Markus Grompe, Aras N. Mattis, Shareef M. Syed, Bruce M. Wang, Jacquelyn J. Maher, Garrett R. Roll, Holger Willenbring","doi":"10.1038/s41587-024-02523-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Therapeutic efficacy and safety of adeno-associated virus (AAV) liver gene therapy depend on capsid choice. To predict AAV capsid performance under near-clinical conditions, we established side-by-side comparison at single-cell resolution in human livers maintained by normothermic machine perfusion. AAV-LK03 transduced hepatocytes much more efficiently and specifically than AAV5, AAV8 and AAV6, which are most commonly used clinically, and AAV-NP59, which is better at transducing human hepatocytes engrafted in immune-deficient mice. AAV-LK03 preferentially transduced periportal hepatocytes in normal liver, whereas AAV5 targeted pericentral hepatocytes in steatotic liver. AAV5 and AAV8 transduced liver sinusoidal endothelial cells as efficiently as hepatocytes. AAV capsid and steatosis influenced vector episome formation, which determines gene therapy durability, with AAV5 delaying concatemerization. Our findings inform capsid choice in clinical AAV liver gene therapy, including consideration of disease-relevant hepatocyte zonation and effects of steatosis, and facilitate the development of AAV capsids that transduce hepatocytes or other therapeutically relevant cell types in the human liver with maximum efficiency and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19084,"journal":{"name":"Nature biotechnology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02523-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AAV capsid prioritization in normal and steatotic human livers maintained by machine perfusion
Therapeutic efficacy and safety of adeno-associated virus (AAV) liver gene therapy depend on capsid choice. To predict AAV capsid performance under near-clinical conditions, we established side-by-side comparison at single-cell resolution in human livers maintained by normothermic machine perfusion. AAV-LK03 transduced hepatocytes much more efficiently and specifically than AAV5, AAV8 and AAV6, which are most commonly used clinically, and AAV-NP59, which is better at transducing human hepatocytes engrafted in immune-deficient mice. AAV-LK03 preferentially transduced periportal hepatocytes in normal liver, whereas AAV5 targeted pericentral hepatocytes in steatotic liver. AAV5 and AAV8 transduced liver sinusoidal endothelial cells as efficiently as hepatocytes. AAV capsid and steatosis influenced vector episome formation, which determines gene therapy durability, with AAV5 delaying concatemerization. Our findings inform capsid choice in clinical AAV liver gene therapy, including consideration of disease-relevant hepatocyte zonation and effects of steatosis, and facilitate the development of AAV capsids that transduce hepatocytes or other therapeutically relevant cell types in the human liver with maximum efficiency and specificity.
期刊介绍:
Nature Biotechnology is a monthly journal that focuses on the science and business of biotechnology. It covers a wide range of topics including technology/methodology advancements in the biological, biomedical, agricultural, and environmental sciences. The journal also explores the commercial, political, ethical, legal, and societal aspects of this research.
The journal serves researchers by providing peer-reviewed research papers in the field of biotechnology. It also serves the business community by delivering news about research developments. This approach ensures that both the scientific and business communities are well-informed and able to stay up-to-date on the latest advancements and opportunities in the field.
Some key areas of interest in which the journal actively seeks research papers include molecular engineering of nucleic acids and proteins, molecular therapy, large-scale biology, computational biology, regenerative medicine, imaging technology, analytical biotechnology, applied immunology, food and agricultural biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
In summary, Nature Biotechnology is a comprehensive journal that covers both the scientific and business aspects of biotechnology. It strives to provide researchers with valuable research papers and news while also delivering important scientific advancements to the business community.