Julia Picinato Medeiros de Araujo Rocha, Carolina Gennari Verruma, Ana Luiza Camargos Morato, Maria Cristina Picinato, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Rosana Maria Dos Reis
{"title":"胚胎冷冻保存:夫妇对此有何看法?","authors":"Julia Picinato Medeiros de Araujo Rocha, Carolina Gennari Verruma, Ana Luiza Camargos Morato, Maria Cristina Picinato, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Rosana Maria Dos Reis","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the perspectives of infertile couples regarding embryo cryopreservation throughout assisted reproduction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The convenience sample included infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. They responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to gauge views and opinions on cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, employing the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 187 couples, with average ages of 35 years for women and 38 years for men. A total of 182 couples (97.3%) agreed with the practice of freezing surplus embryos and, the desire to increase the odds of pregnancy within the same ovarian stimulation cycle was the main motivation (89%). Almost 40% of participants said they might consider embryo donation to other couples for assisted reproductive treatment. However, less than 20% of volunteers (15.38% of women and 12.08% of men) expressed the desire to donate for research purposes. Women with higher levels of education were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to support the donation of surplus embryos for research. Gender, religion, and education did not influence (p>0.05) the respondents' perspectives regarding the beginning of life and posthumous conception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Embryo cryopreservation provides infertile couples with hope however, the fate of surplus embryos remains controversial. A careful approach with appropriate regulation is necessary to ensure safe and ethical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?\",\"authors\":\"Julia Picinato Medeiros de Araujo Rocha, Carolina Gennari Verruma, Ana Luiza Camargos Morato, Maria Cristina Picinato, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Rosana Maria Dos Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20240093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the perspectives of infertile couples regarding embryo cryopreservation throughout assisted reproduction treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The convenience sample included infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. They responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to gauge views and opinions on cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, employing the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 187 couples, with average ages of 35 years for women and 38 years for men. A total of 182 couples (97.3%) agreed with the practice of freezing surplus embryos and, the desire to increase the odds of pregnancy within the same ovarian stimulation cycle was the main motivation (89%). Almost 40% of participants said they might consider embryo donation to other couples for assisted reproductive treatment. However, less than 20% of volunteers (15.38% of women and 12.08% of men) expressed the desire to donate for research purposes. Women with higher levels of education were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to support the donation of surplus embryos for research. Gender, religion, and education did not influence (p>0.05) the respondents' perspectives regarding the beginning of life and posthumous conception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Embryo cryopreservation provides infertile couples with hope however, the fate of surplus embryos remains controversial. A careful approach with appropriate regulation is necessary to ensure safe and ethical practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?
Objective: To investigate the perspectives of infertile couples regarding embryo cryopreservation throughout assisted reproduction treatment.
Methods: The convenience sample included infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. They responded to a questionnaire specifically designed to gauge views and opinions on cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, employing the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests (p<0.05).
Results: The study included 187 couples, with average ages of 35 years for women and 38 years for men. A total of 182 couples (97.3%) agreed with the practice of freezing surplus embryos and, the desire to increase the odds of pregnancy within the same ovarian stimulation cycle was the main motivation (89%). Almost 40% of participants said they might consider embryo donation to other couples for assisted reproductive treatment. However, less than 20% of volunteers (15.38% of women and 12.08% of men) expressed the desire to donate for research purposes. Women with higher levels of education were significantly (p<0.05) more likely to support the donation of surplus embryos for research. Gender, religion, and education did not influence (p>0.05) the respondents' perspectives regarding the beginning of life and posthumous conception.
Conclusions: Embryo cryopreservation provides infertile couples with hope however, the fate of surplus embryos remains controversial. A careful approach with appropriate regulation is necessary to ensure safe and ethical practices.