瑞士驾驶视觉功能评估的全国共识。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Frank Blaser, Martina Schneebeli, Kristina H Keller, Matthias Pfäffli, Margarita G Todorova, Pierre-François Kaeser, Stefano Anastasi, Hannes Wildberger, Frank Bochmann, Sandrine Zweifel, Sadiq Said
{"title":"瑞士驾驶视觉功能评估的全国共识。","authors":"Frank Blaser, Martina Schneebeli, Kristina H Keller, Matthias Pfäffli, Margarita G Todorova, Pierre-François Kaeser, Stefano Anastasi, Hannes Wildberger, Frank Bochmann, Sandrine Zweifel, Sadiq Said","doi":"10.1055/a-2479-9305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The minimum medical requirements for visual function for fitness to drive are regulated by Swiss Federal Law, namely, by the Traffic Licensing Ordinance (TLO). The medical examination techniques relevant in this context and their assessment are not further specified therein, which leads to legal inequality among drivers and uncertainty among examiners. We established a study group of representatives of the Traffic Medicine Section of the Swiss Society of Forensic Medicine and the Traffic Commission of the Swiss Society of Ophthalmology to develop a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland. In structured meetings, the authors discussed medical examination techniques and available international and local recommendations on this topic, with respect to Swiss legislation. In the event of a contrary opinion, the topic was discussed again in a follow-up session until we reached an agreement. We defined consensus as complete agreement on the subject under discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group held five in-person meetings between March 2019 and January 2023. The authors developed recommendations intended for all professional groups assessing driving fitness. We prepared an aid for daily practice on how to examine the minimum medical requirements for visual function listed in the TLO Annex 1, using standardized test procedures and considered how to interpret the findings obtained, accounting for aspects of traffic medicine and ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A consensus on the assessment of visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland is crucial to ensure legal equality for drivers and legal certainty for examiners. Regular review of the consensus is imperative if we are to consider future legal developments and new scientific evidence in assessing fitness to drive.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Consensus on the Assessment of Visual Function for Driving in Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Frank Blaser, Martina Schneebeli, Kristina H Keller, Matthias Pfäffli, Margarita G Todorova, Pierre-François Kaeser, Stefano Anastasi, Hannes Wildberger, Frank Bochmann, Sandrine Zweifel, Sadiq Said\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2479-9305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To establish a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The minimum medical requirements for visual function for fitness to drive are regulated by Swiss Federal Law, namely, by the Traffic Licensing Ordinance (TLO). The medical examination techniques relevant in this context and their assessment are not further specified therein, which leads to legal inequality among drivers and uncertainty among examiners. We established a study group of representatives of the Traffic Medicine Section of the Swiss Society of Forensic Medicine and the Traffic Commission of the Swiss Society of Ophthalmology to develop a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland. In structured meetings, the authors discussed medical examination techniques and available international and local recommendations on this topic, with respect to Swiss legislation. In the event of a contrary opinion, the topic was discussed again in a follow-up session until we reached an agreement. We defined consensus as complete agreement on the subject under discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group held five in-person meetings between March 2019 and January 2023. The authors developed recommendations intended for all professional groups assessing driving fitness. We prepared an aid for daily practice on how to examine the minimum medical requirements for visual function listed in the TLO Annex 1, using standardized test procedures and considered how to interpret the findings obtained, accounting for aspects of traffic medicine and ophthalmology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A consensus on the assessment of visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland is crucial to ensure legal equality for drivers and legal certainty for examiners. Regular review of the consensus is imperative if we are to consider future legal developments and new scientific evidence in assessing fitness to drive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-9305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-9305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在瑞士建立适合驾驶的视觉功能评估的全国共识。方法:瑞士联邦法律,即交通许可条例(TLO)规定了适合驾驶的视觉功能最低医疗要求。在这方面有关的医疗检查技术及其评估没有进一步规定,这导致司机之间的法律不平等和检查员之间的不确定。我们成立了一个由瑞士法医学协会交通医学部和瑞士眼科协会交通委员会代表组成的研究小组,就在瑞士驾驶时是否适合评估视觉功能达成全国共识。在有组织的会议上,提交人讨论了医疗检查技术以及关于这一主题的现有国际和当地建议,以及瑞士立法。如果有反对意见,则在后续会议上再次讨论该议题,直到我们达成协议。我们把协商一致定义为对正在讨论的问题完全达成一致。结果:研究小组在2019年3月至2023年1月期间举行了五次面对面会议。作者提出了针对所有评估驾驶健康的专业团体的建议。我们为日常实践准备了一份辅助材料,说明如何检查TLO附件1中列出的视觉功能的最低医疗要求,使用标准化的测试程序,并考虑如何解释所获得的结果,考虑到交通医学和眼科的各个方面。结论:在瑞士,对适合驾驶的视觉功能评估达成共识对于确保驾驶员的法律平等和检查员的法律确定性至关重要。如果我们要考虑未来的法律发展和评估驾驶适应性的新科学证据,就必须定期审查共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Consensus on the Assessment of Visual Function for Driving in Switzerland.

Purpose: To establish a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland.

Methods: The minimum medical requirements for visual function for fitness to drive are regulated by Swiss Federal Law, namely, by the Traffic Licensing Ordinance (TLO). The medical examination techniques relevant in this context and their assessment are not further specified therein, which leads to legal inequality among drivers and uncertainty among examiners. We established a study group of representatives of the Traffic Medicine Section of the Swiss Society of Forensic Medicine and the Traffic Commission of the Swiss Society of Ophthalmology to develop a national consensus on assessing visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland. In structured meetings, the authors discussed medical examination techniques and available international and local recommendations on this topic, with respect to Swiss legislation. In the event of a contrary opinion, the topic was discussed again in a follow-up session until we reached an agreement. We defined consensus as complete agreement on the subject under discussion.

Results: The study group held five in-person meetings between March 2019 and January 2023. The authors developed recommendations intended for all professional groups assessing driving fitness. We prepared an aid for daily practice on how to examine the minimum medical requirements for visual function listed in the TLO Annex 1, using standardized test procedures and considered how to interpret the findings obtained, accounting for aspects of traffic medicine and ophthalmology.

Conclusions: A consensus on the assessment of visual function for fitness to drive in Switzerland is crucial to ensure legal equality for drivers and legal certainty for examiners. Regular review of the consensus is imperative if we are to consider future legal developments and new scientific evidence in assessing fitness to drive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信