激光视力矫正后的生活质量:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/8833830
Alireza Peyman, Matin Irajpour, Maryam Yazdi, Farzaneh Dehghanian, Pegah Noorshargh, Yasaman Broumand, Farnaz Fatemi, Mohsen Pourazizi
{"title":"激光视力矫正后的生活质量:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alireza Peyman, Matin Irajpour, Maryam Yazdi, Farzaneh Dehghanian, Pegah Noorshargh, Yasaman Broumand, Farnaz Fatemi, Mohsen Pourazizi","doi":"10.1155/joph/8833830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. <b>Methods:</b> Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (<i>β</i> = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8833830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Peyman, Matin Irajpour, Maryam Yazdi, Farzaneh Dehghanian, Pegah Noorshargh, Yasaman Broumand, Farnaz Fatemi, Mohsen Pourazizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/joph/8833830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. <b>Methods:</b> Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. <b>Results:</b> A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (<i>β</i> = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8833830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/8833830\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/8833830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:回顾国内外文献,分析激光视力矫正术后患者的生活质量(QOL)。方法:采用前瞻性或横断面设计的研究,评估LVC后患者的生活质量,并将其与术前或匹配组患者的生活质量进行比较。在Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus和ProQuest上搜索了2024年2月之前发表的相关文章。固定效应或随机效应模型用于估计术后生活质量变化的加权平均差(WMD)。进行meta回归以调整潜在混杂因素的影响。结果:共纳入11篇同行评议文章(1753例患者)。LVC改善了术后1个月(SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60)、3个月(SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50)和6个月(SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11)患者的生活质量。在meta回归分析中,老年患者的生活质量改善低于年轻患者(β = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01)。在比较激光屈光手术后患者和裸眼患者的生活质量时,也没有统计学差异(SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07)。结论:LVC患者的生活质量显著改善,尤其是年轻患者,其生活质量与斜视患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Methods: Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. Results: A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (β = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). Conclusion: Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信