采用回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗IBD患者直肠套管炎的内科、内镜和外科治疗:综述。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Joseph Carter Powers, Emma Dester, Mary Schleicher, Benjamin Cohen, Bret Lashner, Andrei I Ivanov, Tracy Hull, Katherine Falloon, Taha Qazi
{"title":"采用回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗IBD患者直肠套管炎的内科、内镜和外科治疗:综述。","authors":"Joseph Carter Powers, Emma Dester, Mary Schleicher, Benjamin Cohen, Bret Lashner, Andrei I Ivanov, Tracy Hull, Katherine Falloon, Taha Qazi","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08822-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) without mucosectomy may develop inflammation of the rectal cuff (cuffitis). Treatment of cuffitis typically includes mesalamine suppositories or corticosteroids, but refractory cuffitis may necessitate advanced therapies or procedural interventions. This review aims to summarize the existing literature regarding treatments options for cuffitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad search strategy was created by a medical librarian to capture cuffitis in IPAA patients. A total of 1877 citations were identified, and 957 studies remained after removal of 920 duplicates. Two reviewers screened all 957 abstracts and 294 full-text articles to determine if they were eligible for inclusion in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Medical interventions were investigated in 16 studies with mesalamine and corticosteroid regimens being the most common, followed by ustekinumab, vedolizumab, hyperbaric oxygen, tofacitinib, risankizumab, and infliximab. Studies investigating mesalamine and corticosteroid use generally had larger samples (ranging 4-120 patients) and showed symptomatic improvement in 52-100% of patients and decreases of 1.14-1.8 points in endoscopic disease activity indices. In contrast, advanced therapy studies had small samples (ranging 1-21 patients) and variable responses. Seven studies explored endoscopic and surgical approaches including secondary mucosectomy, cuff resection, needle-knife therapy, and balloon dilation for concomitant outlet strictures. These techniques generally resulted in symptomatic resolution but were limited by small samples (ranging 3-40 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies evaluating therapies used to treat cuffitis suggest benefit from conventional mesalamine or corticosteroid-based therapies, whereas data regarding advanced therapies and interventional procedures are inconsistent given small sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatments for Rectal Cuffitis in IBD Patients with an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Carter Powers, Emma Dester, Mary Schleicher, Benjamin Cohen, Bret Lashner, Andrei I Ivanov, Tracy Hull, Katherine Falloon, Taha Qazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08822-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulcerative colitis patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) without mucosectomy may develop inflammation of the rectal cuff (cuffitis). Treatment of cuffitis typically includes mesalamine suppositories or corticosteroids, but refractory cuffitis may necessitate advanced therapies or procedural interventions. This review aims to summarize the existing literature regarding treatments options for cuffitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A broad search strategy was created by a medical librarian to capture cuffitis in IPAA patients. A total of 1877 citations were identified, and 957 studies remained after removal of 920 duplicates. Two reviewers screened all 957 abstracts and 294 full-text articles to determine if they were eligible for inclusion in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Medical interventions were investigated in 16 studies with mesalamine and corticosteroid regimens being the most common, followed by ustekinumab, vedolizumab, hyperbaric oxygen, tofacitinib, risankizumab, and infliximab. Studies investigating mesalamine and corticosteroid use generally had larger samples (ranging 4-120 patients) and showed symptomatic improvement in 52-100% of patients and decreases of 1.14-1.8 points in endoscopic disease activity indices. In contrast, advanced therapy studies had small samples (ranging 1-21 patients) and variable responses. Seven studies explored endoscopic and surgical approaches including secondary mucosectomy, cuff resection, needle-knife therapy, and balloon dilation for concomitant outlet strictures. These techniques generally resulted in symptomatic resolution but were limited by small samples (ranging 3-40 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies evaluating therapies used to treat cuffitis suggest benefit from conventional mesalamine or corticosteroid-based therapies, whereas data regarding advanced therapies and interventional procedures are inconsistent given small sample sizes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08822-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08822-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:溃疡性结肠炎患者行回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)而不切除粘膜可能发生直肠袖炎(cuffitis)。鼻炎的治疗通常包括美萨拉明栓剂或皮质类固醇,但难治性鼻炎可能需要先进的治疗或程序性干预。这篇综述的目的是总结关于鼻窦炎治疗方案的现有文献。方法:一名医学图书管理员创建了一个广泛的搜索策略,以捕获IPAA患者的鼻炎。共确定了1877条引用,在删除920条重复后,还保留了957条研究。两位审稿人筛选了所有957篇摘要和294篇全文文章,以确定它们是否符合纳入本综述的条件。结果:23项研究符合纳入标准。16项研究调查了医疗干预措施,其中美萨拉明和皮质类固醇方案最常见,其次是ustekinumab、vedolizumab、高压氧、托法替尼、瑞桑单抗和英夫利昔单抗。调查美沙拉胺和皮质类固醇使用的研究通常样本量较大(4-120例患者),显示52-100%的患者症状改善,内镜下疾病活动性指数下降1.14-1.8点。相比之下,高级治疗研究的样本量较小(1-21例患者),反应不一。七项研究探讨了内镜和手术方法,包括二次粘膜切除术、袖带切除术、针刀治疗和球囊扩张治疗伴发出口狭窄。这些技术通常导致症状缓解,但受限于小样本(3-40例患者)。结论:评估用于治疗鼻炎的治疗方法的研究表明,传统的美沙拉胺或皮质类固醇为基础的治疗方法有益,而关于先进治疗和介入程序的数据由于样本量小而不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Treatments for Rectal Cuffitis in IBD Patients with an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Narrative Review.

Background: Ulcerative colitis patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) without mucosectomy may develop inflammation of the rectal cuff (cuffitis). Treatment of cuffitis typically includes mesalamine suppositories or corticosteroids, but refractory cuffitis may necessitate advanced therapies or procedural interventions. This review aims to summarize the existing literature regarding treatments options for cuffitis.

Methods: A broad search strategy was created by a medical librarian to capture cuffitis in IPAA patients. A total of 1877 citations were identified, and 957 studies remained after removal of 920 duplicates. Two reviewers screened all 957 abstracts and 294 full-text articles to determine if they were eligible for inclusion in this review.

Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Medical interventions were investigated in 16 studies with mesalamine and corticosteroid regimens being the most common, followed by ustekinumab, vedolizumab, hyperbaric oxygen, tofacitinib, risankizumab, and infliximab. Studies investigating mesalamine and corticosteroid use generally had larger samples (ranging 4-120 patients) and showed symptomatic improvement in 52-100% of patients and decreases of 1.14-1.8 points in endoscopic disease activity indices. In contrast, advanced therapy studies had small samples (ranging 1-21 patients) and variable responses. Seven studies explored endoscopic and surgical approaches including secondary mucosectomy, cuff resection, needle-knife therapy, and balloon dilation for concomitant outlet strictures. These techniques generally resulted in symptomatic resolution but were limited by small samples (ranging 3-40 patients).

Conclusion: Studies evaluating therapies used to treat cuffitis suggest benefit from conventional mesalamine or corticosteroid-based therapies, whereas data regarding advanced therapies and interventional procedures are inconsistent given small sample sizes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信