冷冻疗法预防接受紫杉醇和nab-紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌患者周围神经病变的meta分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Parth Sampat, Michael Sandhu, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Abigail Smith, Shweta Paulraj, Ghanshyam Ghelani, Danning Huang, Dongliang Wang, Abirami Sivapiragasam
{"title":"冷冻疗法预防接受紫杉醇和nab-紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌患者周围神经病变的meta分析。","authors":"Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Parth Sampat, Michael Sandhu, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Abigail Smith, Shweta Paulraj, Ghanshyam Ghelani, Danning Huang, Dongliang Wang, Abirami Sivapiragasam","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy with taxane infusion is a noninvasive strategy for preventing peripheral neuropathy (PN), but the efficacy of this approach has not been proven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted, and 477 records were initially identified. The titles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Fourteen studies were ultimately included for meta-analysis, which was conducted using the meta package in the R software. Only studies that analysed cryotherapy use in breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel were included. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated using the random effects model to compare the occurrence of PN between the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 PN was 24.85% (81/326) in the cryotherapy arm and 42.35% (72/170) in the placebo arm. The overall RR CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN in the cryotherapy group compared with the placebo group was 0.45 [0.27, 0.77, p = 0.0031]. The RR for sensory PN was 0.19 [0.05, 0.66, p = 0.009], and that for motor PN was 0.18 [0.03, 0.99, p = 0.0491]. The RR for Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) scores ≥ D, which indicate severe neuropathy, was 0.24 [0.09, 0.62; p = 0.0035]. Cold intolerance was the most reported t adverse effect, with a prevalence of 15% (37/247).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of cryotherapy decreased the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN by 55%. Cold intolerance was the most frequently reported adverse effect associated with cryotherapy, but this adverse effect did not lead to high discontinuation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the utility of cryotherapy for preventing peripheral neuropathy among breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel.\",\"authors\":\"Prashanth Ashok Kumar, Parth Sampat, Michael Sandhu, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Abigail Smith, Shweta Paulraj, Ghanshyam Ghelani, Danning Huang, Dongliang Wang, Abirami Sivapiragasam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryotherapy with taxane infusion is a noninvasive strategy for preventing peripheral neuropathy (PN), but the efficacy of this approach has not been proven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted, and 477 records were initially identified. The titles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Fourteen studies were ultimately included for meta-analysis, which was conducted using the meta package in the R software. Only studies that analysed cryotherapy use in breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel were included. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated using the random effects model to compare the occurrence of PN between the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 PN was 24.85% (81/326) in the cryotherapy arm and 42.35% (72/170) in the placebo arm. The overall RR CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN in the cryotherapy group compared with the placebo group was 0.45 [0.27, 0.77, p = 0.0031]. The RR for sensory PN was 0.19 [0.05, 0.66, p = 0.009], and that for motor PN was 0.18 [0.03, 0.99, p = 0.0491]. The RR for Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) scores ≥ D, which indicate severe neuropathy, was 0.24 [0.09, 0.62; p = 0.0035]. Cold intolerance was the most reported t adverse effect, with a prevalence of 15% (37/247).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of cryotherapy decreased the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN by 55%. Cold intolerance was the most frequently reported adverse effect associated with cryotherapy, but this adverse effect did not lead to high discontinuation rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07597-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:紫杉烷输注冷冻治疗是一种预防周围神经病变(PN)的无创策略,但这种方法的有效性尚未得到证实。方法:系统检索,初步筛选出477例。标题由2名审稿人独立筛选。最终纳入14项研究进行meta分析,使用R软件中的meta包进行。仅纳入了对接受紫杉醇或nab-紫杉醇治疗的乳腺癌患者进行冷冻治疗的研究。采用随机效应模型计算相对危险度(rr),比较紫杉醇组和nab-紫杉醇组PN的发生情况。结果:不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)≥2级PN发生率在冷冻治疗组为24.85%(81/326),在安慰剂组为42.35%(72/170)。与安慰剂组相比,冷冻治疗组总RR CTCAE分级≥2 PN为0.45 [0.27,0.77,p = 0.0031]。感觉PN的RR为0.19 [0.05,0.66,p = 0.009],运动PN的RR为0.18 [0.03,0.99,p = 0.0491]。患者神经毒性问卷(PNQ)评分≥D提示严重神经病变的RR为0.24 [0.09,0.62;p = 0.0035]。冷不耐受是报告最多的不良反应,患病率为15%(37/247)。结论:冷冻治疗使CTCAE≥2级PN发生率降低55%。寒冷不耐受是与冷冻治疗相关的最常见的不良反应,但这种不良反应并没有导致高停药率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-analysis of the utility of cryotherapy for preventing peripheral neuropathy among breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel.

Background: Cryotherapy with taxane infusion is a noninvasive strategy for preventing peripheral neuropathy (PN), but the efficacy of this approach has not been proven.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted, and 477 records were initially identified. The titles were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Fourteen studies were ultimately included for meta-analysis, which was conducted using the meta package in the R software. Only studies that analysed cryotherapy use in breast cancer patients who received paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel were included. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated using the random effects model to compare the occurrence of PN between the paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel groups.

Results: The incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 2 PN was 24.85% (81/326) in the cryotherapy arm and 42.35% (72/170) in the placebo arm. The overall RR CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN in the cryotherapy group compared with the placebo group was 0.45 [0.27, 0.77, p = 0.0031]. The RR for sensory PN was 0.19 [0.05, 0.66, p = 0.009], and that for motor PN was 0.18 [0.03, 0.99, p = 0.0491]. The RR for Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) scores ≥ D, which indicate severe neuropathy, was 0.24 [0.09, 0.62; p = 0.0035]. Cold intolerance was the most reported t adverse effect, with a prevalence of 15% (37/247).

Conclusions: The use of cryotherapy decreased the occurrence of CTCAE grade ≥ 2 PN by 55%. Cold intolerance was the most frequently reported adverse effect associated with cryotherapy, but this adverse effect did not lead to high discontinuation rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信