Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra在低结核病发病率、高资源环境中评估结核病的实际临床应用。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Jee Whang Kim, Hemu Patel, Richard Halliwell, Robert C Free, Alison Glimour-Caunt, Manish Pareek, Gerrit Woltmann, Raman Verma, Nelun Perera, Pranabashis Haldar
{"title":"Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra在低结核病发病率、高资源环境中评估结核病的实际临床应用。","authors":"Jee Whang Kim, Hemu Patel, Richard Halliwell, Robert C Free, Alison Glimour-Caunt, Manish Pareek, Gerrit Woltmann, Raman Verma, Nelun Perera, Pranabashis Haldar","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in the UK is impacted by delay and suboptimal culture-based microbiological confirmation rates due to the high prevalence of paucibacillary disease. We examine the real-world clinical utility of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) as a diagnostic test and biomarker of transmissible infection in a UK TB service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical specimens from suspected TB cases triple tested (smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture and Xpert-Ultra) at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (1 March 2018-28 February 2019) were retrospectively analysed. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated using positive MTB culture and clinical TB diagnosis as reference standards. The QuantiFERON (QFT) positive proportion of pulmonary TB (PTB) contacts was used as a metric of transmitted infection to evaluate Xpert-Ultra and smear grade as markers of infectiousness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>251 samples (188 respiratory) from 231 patients (86 TB) were analysed. Compared with microscopy, Xpert-Ultra had higher diagnostic sensitivity (24.7% vs 78.7%, p<0.001) and comparable specificity (97.5% vs 99.4%). Xpert-Ultra and culture had comparable sensitivity (78.7% vs 71.9%) and specificity (99.4% vs 100.0%). Incorporating Xpert-Ultra with culture increased microbiologically verified diagnosis to 91.7% for PTB and 75.9% for extrapulmonary TB, compared with 85.0% and 44.8%, using culture alone. In PTB, both smear and Xpert-Ultra grade were positively associated with the proportion of contacts testing QFT positive. However, Xpert-Ultra had a higher negative predictive value than smear (QFT-positive contacts 6.7% vs 17.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In low-TB-burden settings, systematic adoption of Xpert-Ultra for clinical assessment of suspected TB can improve the proportion of microbiologically verified diagnoses and improve the stratification of transmission risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world clinical utility of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in the assessment of tuberculosis in a low-TB-incidence, high-resource setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jee Whang Kim, Hemu Patel, Richard Halliwell, Robert C Free, Alison Glimour-Caunt, Manish Pareek, Gerrit Woltmann, Raman Verma, Nelun Perera, Pranabashis Haldar\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in the UK is impacted by delay and suboptimal culture-based microbiological confirmation rates due to the high prevalence of paucibacillary disease. We examine the real-world clinical utility of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) as a diagnostic test and biomarker of transmissible infection in a UK TB service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical specimens from suspected TB cases triple tested (smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture and Xpert-Ultra) at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (1 March 2018-28 February 2019) were retrospectively analysed. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated using positive MTB culture and clinical TB diagnosis as reference standards. The QuantiFERON (QFT) positive proportion of pulmonary TB (PTB) contacts was used as a metric of transmitted infection to evaluate Xpert-Ultra and smear grade as markers of infectiousness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>251 samples (188 respiratory) from 231 patients (86 TB) were analysed. Compared with microscopy, Xpert-Ultra had higher diagnostic sensitivity (24.7% vs 78.7%, p<0.001) and comparable specificity (97.5% vs 99.4%). Xpert-Ultra and culture had comparable sensitivity (78.7% vs 71.9%) and specificity (99.4% vs 100.0%). Incorporating Xpert-Ultra with culture increased microbiologically verified diagnosis to 91.7% for PTB and 75.9% for extrapulmonary TB, compared with 85.0% and 44.8%, using culture alone. In PTB, both smear and Xpert-Ultra grade were positively associated with the proportion of contacts testing QFT positive. However, Xpert-Ultra had a higher negative predictive value than smear (QFT-positive contacts 6.7% vs 17.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In low-TB-burden settings, systematic adoption of Xpert-Ultra for clinical assessment of suspected TB can improve the proportion of microbiologically verified diagnoses and improve the stratification of transmission risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751901/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核病(TB)的诊断在英国受到延迟和次优的培养为基础的微生物确认率的影响,由于高流行的少杆菌病。我们研究了Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra)作为英国结核病服务中传染性感染的诊断测试和生物标志物的现实世界临床效用。方法:回顾性分析2018年3月1日至2019年2月28日在莱斯特大学医院NHS信托医院进行三项检测(涂片镜检、分枝杆菌培养和expert - ultra)的疑似结核病病例的临床标本。以结核分枝杆菌阳性培养和临床结核诊断为参考标准,计算诊断敏感性和特异性。肺结核(PTB)接触者的QuantiFERON (QFT)阳性比例被用作传播感染的度量,以评估expert - ultra和涂片等级作为感染性标志物。结果:分析了231例(86例)结核患者的251份(188份)呼吸道样本。与显微镜检查相比,Xpert-Ultra的诊断敏感性更高(24.7% vs 78.7%)。结论:在低结核病负担环境中,系统采用expert - ultra进行疑似结核病的临床评估可以提高微生物学验证诊断的比例,并改善传播风险的分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world clinical utility of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in the assessment of tuberculosis in a low-TB-incidence, high-resource setting.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis in the UK is impacted by delay and suboptimal culture-based microbiological confirmation rates due to the high prevalence of paucibacillary disease. We examine the real-world clinical utility of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) as a diagnostic test and biomarker of transmissible infection in a UK TB service.

Methods: Clinical specimens from suspected TB cases triple tested (smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture and Xpert-Ultra) at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (1 March 2018-28 February 2019) were retrospectively analysed. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated using positive MTB culture and clinical TB diagnosis as reference standards. The QuantiFERON (QFT) positive proportion of pulmonary TB (PTB) contacts was used as a metric of transmitted infection to evaluate Xpert-Ultra and smear grade as markers of infectiousness.

Results: 251 samples (188 respiratory) from 231 patients (86 TB) were analysed. Compared with microscopy, Xpert-Ultra had higher diagnostic sensitivity (24.7% vs 78.7%, p<0.001) and comparable specificity (97.5% vs 99.4%). Xpert-Ultra and culture had comparable sensitivity (78.7% vs 71.9%) and specificity (99.4% vs 100.0%). Incorporating Xpert-Ultra with culture increased microbiologically verified diagnosis to 91.7% for PTB and 75.9% for extrapulmonary TB, compared with 85.0% and 44.8%, using culture alone. In PTB, both smear and Xpert-Ultra grade were positively associated with the proportion of contacts testing QFT positive. However, Xpert-Ultra had a higher negative predictive value than smear (QFT-positive contacts 6.7% vs 17.7%).

Conclusion: In low-TB-burden settings, systematic adoption of Xpert-Ultra for clinical assessment of suspected TB can improve the proportion of microbiologically verified diagnoses and improve the stratification of transmission risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信