颈动脉支架植入术中夹持栓塞保护装置的取出一例报告。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gaoyang Fan, Wenyuan Ma, Chunhai Su, Lei Feng, Wenwen Guo
{"title":"颈动脉支架植入术中夹持栓塞保护装置的取出一例报告。","authors":"Gaoyang Fan, Wenyuan Ma, Chunhai Su, Lei Feng, Wenwen Guo","doi":"10.62713/aic.3501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to report a rare case of an embolization protection device (EPD) entrapment during Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) and to discuss the management strategy, including open surgery and concurrent carotid endarterectomy (CEA).</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 71-year-old female presented with left limb weakness and unclear speech following CAS. Imaging revealed a new cerebral infarction and right internal carotid artery stenosis. The patient underwent endovascular retrieval of the entrapped EPD, which failed, leading to an emergency open surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical approach involved a longitudinal incision along the anterior border of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by carotid artery exposure and temporal artery clamps application. The entrapped EPD and stent were successfully retrieved, and the thrombus was aspirated. Subsequent endarterectomy removed the stenotic plaque, and meticulous washing cleared the carotid arteries. Post-operative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography confirmed patency of the arteries, and the patient was discharged without new neurological symptoms after 11 days of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case underscores the challenges in managing EPD entrapment during CAS and the necessity for a swift transition to open surgical intervention when endovascular techniques fail. The concurrent performance of CEA in such cases offers a comprehensive treatment strategy, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in complex vascular interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 1","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrieval of Entrapped Embolic Protection Device during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Gaoyang Fan, Wenyuan Ma, Chunhai Su, Lei Feng, Wenwen Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to report a rare case of an embolization protection device (EPD) entrapment during Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) and to discuss the management strategy, including open surgery and concurrent carotid endarterectomy (CEA).</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 71-year-old female presented with left limb weakness and unclear speech following CAS. Imaging revealed a new cerebral infarction and right internal carotid artery stenosis. The patient underwent endovascular retrieval of the entrapped EPD, which failed, leading to an emergency open surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical approach involved a longitudinal incision along the anterior border of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by carotid artery exposure and temporal artery clamps application. The entrapped EPD and stent were successfully retrieved, and the thrombus was aspirated. Subsequent endarterectomy removed the stenotic plaque, and meticulous washing cleared the carotid arteries. Post-operative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography confirmed patency of the arteries, and the patient was discharged without new neurological symptoms after 11 days of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case underscores the challenges in managing EPD entrapment during CAS and the necessity for a swift transition to open surgical intervention when endovascular techniques fail. The concurrent performance of CEA in such cases offers a comprehensive treatment strategy, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in complex vascular interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"7-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3501\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:报告1例颈动脉支架(CAS)置入过程中栓塞保护装置(EPD)夹持的罕见病例,并探讨开放性手术及颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的处理策略。病例介绍:一名71岁女性,在CAS术后表现为左肢体无力和言语不清。影像学显示新发脑梗死及右侧颈内动脉狭窄。患者接受血管内取出被困的EPD,但失败,导致紧急开放手术。结果:手术入路包括沿右侧胸锁乳突肌前缘纵向切口,随后颈动脉暴露和颞动脉夹应用。成功取出被包裹的EPD和支架,并抽吸血栓。随后的动脉内膜切除术去除狭窄斑块,并仔细清洗颈动脉。术后吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影证实动脉通畅,患者住院11天后出院,无新的神经系统症状。结论:该病例强调了在CAS期间处理EPD夹持的挑战,以及当血管内技术失败时迅速过渡到开放手术干预的必要性。在这些病例中,CEA的同时表现提供了一种全面的治疗策略,强调了多学科方法在复杂血管干预中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrieval of Entrapped Embolic Protection Device during Carotid Artery Stenting: A Case Report.

Aim: This study aims to report a rare case of an embolization protection device (EPD) entrapment during Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) and to discuss the management strategy, including open surgery and concurrent carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Case presentation: A 71-year-old female presented with left limb weakness and unclear speech following CAS. Imaging revealed a new cerebral infarction and right internal carotid artery stenosis. The patient underwent endovascular retrieval of the entrapped EPD, which failed, leading to an emergency open surgical procedure.

Results: The surgical approach involved a longitudinal incision along the anterior border of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by carotid artery exposure and temporal artery clamps application. The entrapped EPD and stent were successfully retrieved, and the thrombus was aspirated. Subsequent endarterectomy removed the stenotic plaque, and meticulous washing cleared the carotid arteries. Post-operative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography confirmed patency of the arteries, and the patient was discharged without new neurological symptoms after 11 days of hospitalization.

Conclusions: This case underscores the challenges in managing EPD entrapment during CAS and the necessity for a swift transition to open surgical intervention when endovascular techniques fail. The concurrent performance of CEA in such cases offers a comprehensive treatment strategy, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in complex vascular interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信