博弈与博弈者:参与博弈者对区域空间能源博弈过程与结果的影响

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Hartmut Dumke, Pia Nabielek
{"title":"博弈与博弈者:参与博弈者对区域空间能源博弈过程与结果的影响","authors":"Hartmut Dumke,&nbsp;Pia Nabielek","doi":"10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>One major question of climate and energy policy is how to act under conditions of great uncertainty. This contribution relates to the literature that studies how various actors draft regional energy scenarios and pathways in so-called serious games. Serious gaming aims to foster contextual knowledge generation about complex problems and spatial solutions associated with sustainability transitions.</p><p>Little attention has thus far been paid to the question of how to design a serious game that enables desired game results through different player constellations. Shortcomings in the literature regarding the inclusion of relevant players and secure game experience through player interaction are covered by stakeholder theory. Our approach assigns different attributes to individual players which secures that the game is played from various perspectives and by actual stakeholders.</p><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Our empirical study shows the impact of players with different stakeholder attributes on two game results: the first game result is a spatial energy scenario (output) and the second result is the collective and place-based learning experience during the game (outcome). The paper closes with three concluding recommendations:</p><ul>\n <li>\n <p>It is important to pay attention to player’s attributes as well as to constellations of players since they influence game experience (outcome) and achieved scenario (output).</p>\n </li>\n <li>\n <p>Player’s attributes and constellations can partly explain differences in game results, but more empirical work on the influence of players and games on the results is necessary. In the future, more attention should be paid to the interaction, discussions and dynamics within the player teams.</p>\n </li>\n <li>\n <p>The optimization of player teams needs to be strongly considered in game design. Also, we note that if the game is played in a regional context, the spatial orientation (the region) could be taken into greater account when applying stakeholder theory.</p>\n </li>\n </ul></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Games and gamers: the influence of participating players on the process and outcome of regional spatial energy games\",\"authors\":\"Hartmut Dumke,&nbsp;Pia Nabielek\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>One major question of climate and energy policy is how to act under conditions of great uncertainty. This contribution relates to the literature that studies how various actors draft regional energy scenarios and pathways in so-called serious games. Serious gaming aims to foster contextual knowledge generation about complex problems and spatial solutions associated with sustainability transitions.</p><p>Little attention has thus far been paid to the question of how to design a serious game that enables desired game results through different player constellations. Shortcomings in the literature regarding the inclusion of relevant players and secure game experience through player interaction are covered by stakeholder theory. Our approach assigns different attributes to individual players which secures that the game is played from various perspectives and by actual stakeholders.</p><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Our empirical study shows the impact of players with different stakeholder attributes on two game results: the first game result is a spatial energy scenario (output) and the second result is the collective and place-based learning experience during the game (outcome). The paper closes with three concluding recommendations:</p><ul>\\n <li>\\n <p>It is important to pay attention to player’s attributes as well as to constellations of players since they influence game experience (outcome) and achieved scenario (output).</p>\\n </li>\\n <li>\\n <p>Player’s attributes and constellations can partly explain differences in game results, but more empirical work on the influence of players and games on the results is necessary. In the future, more attention should be paid to the interaction, discussions and dynamics within the player teams.</p>\\n </li>\\n <li>\\n <p>The optimization of player teams needs to be strongly considered in game design. Also, we note that if the game is played in a regional context, the spatial orientation (the region) could be taken into greater account when applying stakeholder theory.</p>\\n </li>\\n </ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy, Sustainability and Society\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy, Sustainability and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-024-00501-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候和能源政策的一个主要问题是如何在极不确定的情况下采取行动。这一贡献与研究不同参与者如何在所谓的严肃游戏中起草区域能源情景和路径的文献有关。严肃游戏旨在培养与可持续性过渡相关的复杂问题和空间解决方案的背景知识生成。到目前为止,很少有人关注如何设计一款严肃的游戏,通过不同的玩家群体实现理想的游戏结果。利益相关者理论涵盖了文献中关于包含相关玩家和通过玩家互动获得游戏体验的不足。我们的方法为个体玩家分配了不同的属性,从而确保玩家能够从不同的角度和实际利益相关者玩游戏。结果与结论我们的实证研究表明,不同利益相关者属性的参与者对两种博弈结果的影响:第一种博弈结果是空间能量情景(输出),第二种结果是博弈过程中基于场所的集体学习体验(结果)。这篇论文最后提出了三个结论:关注玩家属性和玩家群体非常重要,因为它们会影响游戏体验(结果)和实现场景(输出)。玩家的属性和星座可以部分解释游戏结果的差异,但更多关于玩家和游戏对结果影响的实证研究是必要的。在未来,我们应该更加关注玩家团队内部的互动、讨论和动态。玩家团队的优化需要在游戏设计中得到充分考虑。此外,我们注意到,如果游戏是在区域背景下进行的,那么在应用利益相关者理论时,可以更多地考虑空间方向(区域)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Games and gamers: the influence of participating players on the process and outcome of regional spatial energy games

Background

One major question of climate and energy policy is how to act under conditions of great uncertainty. This contribution relates to the literature that studies how various actors draft regional energy scenarios and pathways in so-called serious games. Serious gaming aims to foster contextual knowledge generation about complex problems and spatial solutions associated with sustainability transitions.

Little attention has thus far been paid to the question of how to design a serious game that enables desired game results through different player constellations. Shortcomings in the literature regarding the inclusion of relevant players and secure game experience through player interaction are covered by stakeholder theory. Our approach assigns different attributes to individual players which secures that the game is played from various perspectives and by actual stakeholders.

Results and conclusions

Our empirical study shows the impact of players with different stakeholder attributes on two game results: the first game result is a spatial energy scenario (output) and the second result is the collective and place-based learning experience during the game (outcome). The paper closes with three concluding recommendations:

  • It is important to pay attention to player’s attributes as well as to constellations of players since they influence game experience (outcome) and achieved scenario (output).

  • Player’s attributes and constellations can partly explain differences in game results, but more empirical work on the influence of players and games on the results is necessary. In the future, more attention should be paid to the interaction, discussions and dynamics within the player teams.

  • The optimization of player teams needs to be strongly considered in game design. Also, we note that if the game is played in a regional context, the spatial orientation (the region) could be taken into greater account when applying stakeholder theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信