反复振动作用下饱和地基颗粒柱改进试验研究及液化再液化性能评价

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
R. V. Yogesh, S. Ganesh Kumar, G. Santha Kumar
{"title":"反复振动作用下饱和地基颗粒柱改进试验研究及液化再液化性能评价","authors":"R. V. Yogesh,&nbsp;S. Ganesh Kumar,&nbsp;G. Santha Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-02075-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil liquefaction significantly contributes to inducing catastrophic damage to the infrastructures. Different ground improvement methods were used widely to improve the seismic resistance of liquefiable deposits to mitigate liquefaction. Use of granular column technique is a popular and well-recognized improvement technique due to its drainage, shear reinforcement, and densification characteristics. However, studies relating to seismic resistance of stone column-reinforced ground against multiple shaking events were limited. Recent seismic events also have shown the possibility of liquefaction and reliquefaction due to multiple seismic events. Considering this, the performance assessment of the granular column technique in liquefiable soil under repeated shaking events is addressed in this study. The possibility of re-using construction and demolition waste concrete aggregates as an alternative to natural aggregates is also attempted to propose sustainability in ground improvement. For experimental testing, a saturated ground having 40% density was prepared and subjected to sequential incremental acceleration loading conditions, i.e., 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, and 0.4 g at 5 Hz loading frequency for 40 s shaking duration using a 1 g Uni-axial shake table. The efficiency of selected ground improvement was evaluated and compared with untreated ground. The experimental results showed that ground reinforced with granular columns performs better up to 0.2 g shaking events in minimizing pore water pressure and settlement. Possibility of column clogging, and inadequate area replacement ratio (5%) affects the performance of column during repeated shaking. Also, irrespective of improvement in in-situ ground density; continuous generation of pore water pressure due to absence of drainage posing reliquefaction potential in untreated ground under repeated shaking events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"83 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigations on granular column improvement in saturated ground subjected to repeated shaking events and its performance assessment in liquefaction and reliquefaction mitigation\",\"authors\":\"R. V. Yogesh,&nbsp;S. Ganesh Kumar,&nbsp;G. Santha Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-02075-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil liquefaction significantly contributes to inducing catastrophic damage to the infrastructures. Different ground improvement methods were used widely to improve the seismic resistance of liquefiable deposits to mitigate liquefaction. Use of granular column technique is a popular and well-recognized improvement technique due to its drainage, shear reinforcement, and densification characteristics. However, studies relating to seismic resistance of stone column-reinforced ground against multiple shaking events were limited. Recent seismic events also have shown the possibility of liquefaction and reliquefaction due to multiple seismic events. Considering this, the performance assessment of the granular column technique in liquefiable soil under repeated shaking events is addressed in this study. The possibility of re-using construction and demolition waste concrete aggregates as an alternative to natural aggregates is also attempted to propose sustainability in ground improvement. For experimental testing, a saturated ground having 40% density was prepared and subjected to sequential incremental acceleration loading conditions, i.e., 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, and 0.4 g at 5 Hz loading frequency for 40 s shaking duration using a 1 g Uni-axial shake table. The efficiency of selected ground improvement was evaluated and compared with untreated ground. The experimental results showed that ground reinforced with granular columns performs better up to 0.2 g shaking events in minimizing pore water pressure and settlement. Possibility of column clogging, and inadequate area replacement ratio (5%) affects the performance of column during repeated shaking. Also, irrespective of improvement in in-situ ground density; continuous generation of pore water pressure due to absence of drainage posing reliquefaction potential in untreated ground under repeated shaking events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"83 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02075-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-02075-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤液化是引起基础设施灾难性破坏的重要因素。不同的地基改善方法被广泛用于提高可液化沉积物的抗震性能,以减轻液化。颗粒柱技术由于其排水、抗剪加固和致密化的特点,是一种流行的、公认的改进技术。然而,关于石柱加筋地基在多次震动作用下的抗震性能研究较少。最近的地震事件也显示了多重地震事件造成液化和再液化的可能性。考虑到这一点,本文研究了反复振动作用下液化土中颗粒柱技术的性能评价。重新使用建筑和拆卸废料混凝土集料作为天然集料的替代品的可能性也被尝试,以提出可持续的地面改善。为进行实验测试,制备了密度为40%的饱和地基,采用1 g单轴振动台,在5 Hz加载频率下,分别施加0.1 g、0.2 g、0.3 g、0.4 g的顺序增量加速度加载条件,振动持续时间为40 s。评价了选定地基的改良效果,并与未处理地基进行了比较。试验结果表明,当震动强度达到0.2 g时,颗粒柱加固地基在减小孔隙水压力和沉降方面表现较好。在反复震动过程中,柱体堵塞的可能性和面积置换率(5%)不足会影响柱体的性能。此外,无论原位地面密度的改善;在反复的震动事件下,未经处理的地面由于没有排水而连续产生孔隙水压力,具有再液化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experimental investigations on granular column improvement in saturated ground subjected to repeated shaking events and its performance assessment in liquefaction and reliquefaction mitigation

Experimental investigations on granular column improvement in saturated ground subjected to repeated shaking events and its performance assessment in liquefaction and reliquefaction mitigation

Soil liquefaction significantly contributes to inducing catastrophic damage to the infrastructures. Different ground improvement methods were used widely to improve the seismic resistance of liquefiable deposits to mitigate liquefaction. Use of granular column technique is a popular and well-recognized improvement technique due to its drainage, shear reinforcement, and densification characteristics. However, studies relating to seismic resistance of stone column-reinforced ground against multiple shaking events were limited. Recent seismic events also have shown the possibility of liquefaction and reliquefaction due to multiple seismic events. Considering this, the performance assessment of the granular column technique in liquefiable soil under repeated shaking events is addressed in this study. The possibility of re-using construction and demolition waste concrete aggregates as an alternative to natural aggregates is also attempted to propose sustainability in ground improvement. For experimental testing, a saturated ground having 40% density was prepared and subjected to sequential incremental acceleration loading conditions, i.e., 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, and 0.4 g at 5 Hz loading frequency for 40 s shaking duration using a 1 g Uni-axial shake table. The efficiency of selected ground improvement was evaluated and compared with untreated ground. The experimental results showed that ground reinforced with granular columns performs better up to 0.2 g shaking events in minimizing pore water pressure and settlement. Possibility of column clogging, and inadequate area replacement ratio (5%) affects the performance of column during repeated shaking. Also, irrespective of improvement in in-situ ground density; continuous generation of pore water pressure due to absence of drainage posing reliquefaction potential in untreated ground under repeated shaking events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信