产科青霉素过敏评估。

Lakshmi G. Nair MD , S. Shahzad Mustafa MD , Allison Ramsey MD
{"title":"产科青霉素过敏评估。","authors":"Lakshmi G. Nair MD ,&nbsp;S. Shahzad Mustafa MD ,&nbsp;Allison Ramsey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Penicillin allergy is reported in 5% to 15% of the world population, with 3% to 10% of pregnant women reporting the same. However, more than 90% of these patients can tolerate penicillin after appropriate evaluation. Penicillin is indicated for various issues that arise in pregnancy, and a history of allergy can have negative individual and public health consequences.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and select obstetric outcomes of obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations arranged through a direct referral phone line from obstetric practices to an employed allergy/immunology practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were referred via direct phone line for evaluation during their antenatal visits between May 2019 and May 2022. Patients underwent skin prick testing, and those with a negative penicillin skin testing (PST) result were subjected to amoxicillin challenge. In select cases of patients with a low-risk history, direct oral challenge was performed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 324 patients referred between May 2019 and May 2022, a total of 251 (77.5%) presented for in-office evaluations. Of those 251 patients, 239 (95.2%) underwent PST followed by oral challenge if the PST result was negative; 12 patients (4.8%) underwent direct challenge without skin testing, and all of them passed the challenge. Of the patients undergoing PST, 230 (97.2%) had a negative result and 229 tolerated subsequent oral amoxicillin doses, with 1 patient experiencing a delayed reaction to the amoxicillin. The group of patients who presented for evaluation included more people living in ZIP codes described as being of high socioeconomic status than in the no-show group (73.7% vs 63.3%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, ours is the largest study to date to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a phone line for obstetric penicillin allergy referrals. We demonstrate a better show rate than previous analyses, with most of the patients presenting for evaluation being successfully delabeled.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Lakshmi G. Nair MD ,&nbsp;S. Shahzad Mustafa MD ,&nbsp;Allison Ramsey MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Penicillin allergy is reported in 5% to 15% of the world population, with 3% to 10% of pregnant women reporting the same. However, more than 90% of these patients can tolerate penicillin after appropriate evaluation. Penicillin is indicated for various issues that arise in pregnancy, and a history of allergy can have negative individual and public health consequences.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and select obstetric outcomes of obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations arranged through a direct referral phone line from obstetric practices to an employed allergy/immunology practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients were referred via direct phone line for evaluation during their antenatal visits between May 2019 and May 2022. Patients underwent skin prick testing, and those with a negative penicillin skin testing (PST) result were subjected to amoxicillin challenge. In select cases of patients with a low-risk history, direct oral challenge was performed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 324 patients referred between May 2019 and May 2022, a total of 251 (77.5%) presented for in-office evaluations. Of those 251 patients, 239 (95.2%) underwent PST followed by oral challenge if the PST result was negative; 12 patients (4.8%) underwent direct challenge without skin testing, and all of them passed the challenge. Of the patients undergoing PST, 230 (97.2%) had a negative result and 229 tolerated subsequent oral amoxicillin doses, with 1 patient experiencing a delayed reaction to the amoxicillin. The group of patients who presented for evaluation included more people living in ZIP codes described as being of high socioeconomic status than in the no-show group (73.7% vs 63.3%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, ours is the largest study to date to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a phone line for obstetric penicillin allergy referrals. We demonstrate a better show rate than previous analyses, with most of the patients presenting for evaluation being successfully delabeled.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829324001723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青霉素过敏报告占世界人口的5%至15%,其中3%至10%的孕妇报告同样的情况。然而,经过适当的评估,90%以上的患者可以耐受青霉素。青霉素适用于妊娠期间出现的各种问题,过敏史可能对个人和公共健康产生负面影响。目的:我们的目的是前瞻性地评估产科青霉素过敏评估的可行性、安全性和选择产科结果,这些评估通过直接转诊电话从产科诊所安排到过敏/免疫学诊所。方法:于2019年5月至2022年5月期间,通过电话直接转介患者进行产前检查。患者进行皮肤点刺试验,青霉素皮肤试验(PST)阴性的患者进行阿莫西林刺激。在有低风险病史的患者中,直接进行口腔攻击。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:在2019年5月至2022年5月期间转诊的324例患者中,共有251例(77.5%)进行了现场评估。在这251名患者中,239名(95.2%)接受了PST检查,如果PST结果为阴性,则再进行口腔穿刺;12例(4.8%)患者直接激射,未进行皮肤试验,均通过激射。在接受PST治疗的患者中,230例(97.2%)结果为阴性,229例后续口服阿莫西林耐受,1例患者出现阿莫西林延迟反应。与未就诊组相比,就诊组中居住在被描述为高社会经济地位的邮政编码地区的患者更多(73.7% vs 63.3%)。结论:据我们所知,我们的研究是迄今为止最大的研究,以证明产科青霉素过敏转诊电话线路的安全性和可行性。我们证明了一个更好的显示率比以前的分析,大多数患者提出评估被成功地去标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations

Background

Penicillin allergy is reported in 5% to 15% of the world population, with 3% to 10% of pregnant women reporting the same. However, more than 90% of these patients can tolerate penicillin after appropriate evaluation. Penicillin is indicated for various issues that arise in pregnancy, and a history of allergy can have negative individual and public health consequences.

Objective

Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and select obstetric outcomes of obstetric penicillin allergy evaluations arranged through a direct referral phone line from obstetric practices to an employed allergy/immunology practice.

Methods

Patients were referred via direct phone line for evaluation during their antenatal visits between May 2019 and May 2022. Patients underwent skin prick testing, and those with a negative penicillin skin testing (PST) result were subjected to amoxicillin challenge. In select cases of patients with a low-risk history, direct oral challenge was performed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Of the 324 patients referred between May 2019 and May 2022, a total of 251 (77.5%) presented for in-office evaluations. Of those 251 patients, 239 (95.2%) underwent PST followed by oral challenge if the PST result was negative; 12 patients (4.8%) underwent direct challenge without skin testing, and all of them passed the challenge. Of the patients undergoing PST, 230 (97.2%) had a negative result and 229 tolerated subsequent oral amoxicillin doses, with 1 patient experiencing a delayed reaction to the amoxicillin. The group of patients who presented for evaluation included more people living in ZIP codes described as being of high socioeconomic status than in the no-show group (73.7% vs 63.3%).

Conclusion

To our knowledge, ours is the largest study to date to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of a phone line for obstetric penicillin allergy referrals. We demonstrate a better show rate than previous analyses, with most of the patients presenting for evaluation being successfully delabeled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信