人工智能预测剖宫产双胎术后出血。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sukran Dogru, Huriye Ezveci, Fatih Akkus, Pelin Bahçeci, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Ali Acar
{"title":"人工智能预测剖宫产双胎术后出血。","authors":"Sukran Dogru, Huriye Ezveci, Fatih Akkus, Pelin Bahçeci, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Ali Acar","doi":"10.1017/thg.2024.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to create a risk prediction model with artificial intelligence (AI) to identify patients at higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage using perinatal characteristics that may be associated with later postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in twin pregnancies that underwent cesarean section. The study was planned as a retrospective cohort study at University Hospital. All twin cesarean deliveries were categorized into two groups: those with and without PPH. Using the perinatal characteristics of the cases, four different machine learning classifiers were created: Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). LR, RF, and SVM models were created a second time by including class weights to manage the underlying imbalances in the data. A total of 615 twin pregnancies were included in the study. There were 150 twin pregnancies with PPH and 465 without PPH. Dichorionity, PAS, and placenta previa were significantly higher in the PPH-positive group (<i>p</i> = .045, <i>p</i> = .004, <i>p</i> = .001 respectively). In our model, LR with class weight was the best model with the highest negative predictive value. The AUC in our LR with class weight model was %75.12 with an accuracy of 70.73%, a PPV of 47.92%, and an NPV of 85.33% in our data. Although the application of machine learning to create predictive models using clinical risk factors and our model's 70% accuracy rate are encouraging, it is not sufficient. Machine learning modeling needs further study and validation before being incorporated into clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Postpartum Hemorrhage in Twin Pregnancies Undergoing Cesarean Section.\",\"authors\":\"Sukran Dogru, Huriye Ezveci, Fatih Akkus, Pelin Bahçeci, Fikriye Karanfil Yaman, Ali Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2024.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to create a risk prediction model with artificial intelligence (AI) to identify patients at higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage using perinatal characteristics that may be associated with later postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in twin pregnancies that underwent cesarean section. The study was planned as a retrospective cohort study at University Hospital. All twin cesarean deliveries were categorized into two groups: those with and without PPH. Using the perinatal characteristics of the cases, four different machine learning classifiers were created: Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). LR, RF, and SVM models were created a second time by including class weights to manage the underlying imbalances in the data. A total of 615 twin pregnancies were included in the study. There were 150 twin pregnancies with PPH and 465 without PPH. Dichorionity, PAS, and placenta previa were significantly higher in the PPH-positive group (<i>p</i> = .045, <i>p</i> = .004, <i>p</i> = .001 respectively). In our model, LR with class weight was the best model with the highest negative predictive value. The AUC in our LR with class weight model was %75.12 with an accuracy of 70.73%, a PPV of 47.92%, and an NPV of 85.33% in our data. Although the application of machine learning to create predictive models using clinical risk factors and our model's 70% accuracy rate are encouraging, it is not sufficient. Machine learning modeling needs further study and validation before being incorporated into clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2024.48\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2024.48","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在建立人工智能(AI)风险预测模型,利用剖宫产双胎妊娠可能与后期产后出血(PPH)相关的围产期特征,识别产后出血高风险患者。本研究计划在大学医院进行回顾性队列研究。所有双胞胎剖宫产被分为两组:有和没有PPH。根据病例的围产期特征,创建了四种不同的机器学习分类器:逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和多层感知器(MLP)。通过包含类权重来管理数据中潜在的不平衡,第二次创建了LR、RF和SVM模型。共有615名双胞胎孕妇参与了这项研究。有150例双胎妊娠伴有PPH, 465例未伴有PPH。pph阳性组的二分性、PAS、前置胎盘明显增高(p = 0.045, p = 0.004, p = 0.001)。在我们的模型中,具有类权的LR是最佳模型,负预测值最高。我们的LR与类权模型的AUC为%75.12,准确率为70.73%,PPV为47.92%,NPV为85.33%。虽然应用机器学习来创建使用临床风险因素的预测模型和我们的模型70%的准确率是令人鼓舞的,但这还不够。机器学习建模在应用于临床前还需要进一步的研究和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Postpartum Hemorrhage in Twin Pregnancies Undergoing Cesarean Section.

This study aimed to create a risk prediction model with artificial intelligence (AI) to identify patients at higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage using perinatal characteristics that may be associated with later postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in twin pregnancies that underwent cesarean section. The study was planned as a retrospective cohort study at University Hospital. All twin cesarean deliveries were categorized into two groups: those with and without PPH. Using the perinatal characteristics of the cases, four different machine learning classifiers were created: Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). LR, RF, and SVM models were created a second time by including class weights to manage the underlying imbalances in the data. A total of 615 twin pregnancies were included in the study. There were 150 twin pregnancies with PPH and 465 without PPH. Dichorionity, PAS, and placenta previa were significantly higher in the PPH-positive group (p = .045, p = .004, p = .001 respectively). In our model, LR with class weight was the best model with the highest negative predictive value. The AUC in our LR with class weight model was %75.12 with an accuracy of 70.73%, a PPV of 47.92%, and an NPV of 85.33% in our data. Although the application of machine learning to create predictive models using clinical risk factors and our model's 70% accuracy rate are encouraging, it is not sufficient. Machine learning modeling needs further study and validation before being incorporated into clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信