根据美国放射学会(ACR)标准评估约旦乳腺x光检查的平均腺体剂量。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S497104
Rasha Al Hrout, Mohammad Ayasrah, Nurul Zahirah Noor Azman
{"title":"根据美国放射学会(ACR)标准评估约旦乳腺x光检查的平均腺体剂量。","authors":"Rasha Al Hrout, Mohammad Ayasrah, Nurul Zahirah Noor Azman","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S497104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is a significant worldwide health issue, particularly in Jordan, where early detection via mammography is essential for effective disease management. Despite the little radiation risk associated with mammography, it is crucial to monitor radiation exposure to guarantee patient safety. This study intends to assess skin entrance exposure and compute the Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in mammography units to determine adherence to established criteria and pinpoint areas for enhancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess MGD, the study utilized the American College of Radiologists (ACR) phantom alongside a RaySafe X2 MAM dosimeter. Measurements of entrance kerma and half-value layer (HVL) were taken across 25 mammography units in Jordan. The MGD was calculated according to the ACR's 2018 protocol, which provides a standardized approach to ensure accurate and comparable dose estimations. These measurements were then analyzed against the ACR's threshold of 3 mGy to assess compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the average MGD across all units was 2.3 mGy, with individual values ranging from 0.95 to 4.10 mGy. Although 67% of the units maintained MGD values within the ACR threshold, 33% exceeded the recommended limit of 3 mGy. Higher MGD values were particularly common in non-accredited facilities, where the average MGD reached 2.7 mGy, compared to 1.6 mGy in accredited units, suggesting gaps in quality control and adherence to best practices in non-accredited centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the critical role of accreditation and adherence to quality standards in maintaining safe and effective mammography practices. While most mammography units in Jordan meet the ACR's recommended MGD limits, the elevated dose levels in some non-accredited facilities highlight the need for more rigorous implementation of accreditation standards. Improving compliance with established guidelines will enhance breast cancer screening effectiveness, ultimately supporting better early detection and outcomes for breast cancer in Jordan.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography in Jordan According to American College of Radiology (ACR) Standards.\",\"authors\":\"Rasha Al Hrout, Mohammad Ayasrah, Nurul Zahirah Noor Azman\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CMAR.S497104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is a significant worldwide health issue, particularly in Jordan, where early detection via mammography is essential for effective disease management. Despite the little radiation risk associated with mammography, it is crucial to monitor radiation exposure to guarantee patient safety. This study intends to assess skin entrance exposure and compute the Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in mammography units to determine adherence to established criteria and pinpoint areas for enhancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess MGD, the study utilized the American College of Radiologists (ACR) phantom alongside a RaySafe X2 MAM dosimeter. Measurements of entrance kerma and half-value layer (HVL) were taken across 25 mammography units in Jordan. The MGD was calculated according to the ACR's 2018 protocol, which provides a standardized approach to ensure accurate and comparable dose estimations. These measurements were then analyzed against the ACR's threshold of 3 mGy to assess compliance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the average MGD across all units was 2.3 mGy, with individual values ranging from 0.95 to 4.10 mGy. Although 67% of the units maintained MGD values within the ACR threshold, 33% exceeded the recommended limit of 3 mGy. Higher MGD values were particularly common in non-accredited facilities, where the average MGD reached 2.7 mGy, compared to 1.6 mGy in accredited units, suggesting gaps in quality control and adherence to best practices in non-accredited centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the critical role of accreditation and adherence to quality standards in maintaining safe and effective mammography practices. While most mammography units in Jordan meet the ACR's recommended MGD limits, the elevated dose levels in some non-accredited facilities highlight the need for more rigorous implementation of accreditation standards. Improving compliance with established guidelines will enhance breast cancer screening effectiveness, ultimately supporting better early detection and outcomes for breast cancer in Jordan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"11-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S497104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S497104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:乳腺癌是一个全球性的重大健康问题,特别是在约旦,通过乳房x光检查进行早期发现对于有效的疾病管理至关重要。尽管与乳房x光检查相关的辐射风险很小,但监测辐射暴露以保证患者安全至关重要。本研究旨在评估皮肤入口暴露并计算乳腺x光检查单位的平均腺体剂量(MGD),以确定是否遵守既定标准并确定需要增强的区域。方法:为了评估MGD,研究使用了美国放射学会(ACR)假体和RaySafe X2 MAM剂量计。测量入口kerma和半值层(HVL)在约旦的25个乳房x线照相术单位。MGD是根据ACR 2018年方案计算的,该方案提供了一种标准化方法,以确保准确和可比的剂量估计。然后根据ACR的3 mGy阈值对这些测量结果进行分析,以评估依从性。结果:研究发现,所有单位的平均MGD为2.3 mGy,个别值在0.95至4.10 mGy之间。尽管67%的机组将MGD值维持在ACR阈值内,但33%的机组超过了建议的3 mGy限值。较高的MGD值在未经认证的设施中尤为普遍,其平均MGD达到2.7 mGy,而经认证的单位为1.6 mGy,这表明未经认证的中心在质量控制和遵守最佳做法方面存在差距。结论:本研究强调了认证和遵守质量标准在维持安全有效的乳房x光检查实践中的关键作用。虽然约旦大多数乳房x光检查单位达到了ACR推荐的MGD限值,但一些未经认证的设施的剂量水平升高突出表明需要更严格地执行认证标准。改善对既定指南的遵守将提高乳腺癌筛查的有效性,最终支持约旦更好的乳腺癌早期发现和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography in Jordan According to American College of Radiology (ACR) Standards.

Introduction: Breast cancer is a significant worldwide health issue, particularly in Jordan, where early detection via mammography is essential for effective disease management. Despite the little radiation risk associated with mammography, it is crucial to monitor radiation exposure to guarantee patient safety. This study intends to assess skin entrance exposure and compute the Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) in mammography units to determine adherence to established criteria and pinpoint areas for enhancement.

Methods: To assess MGD, the study utilized the American College of Radiologists (ACR) phantom alongside a RaySafe X2 MAM dosimeter. Measurements of entrance kerma and half-value layer (HVL) were taken across 25 mammography units in Jordan. The MGD was calculated according to the ACR's 2018 protocol, which provides a standardized approach to ensure accurate and comparable dose estimations. These measurements were then analyzed against the ACR's threshold of 3 mGy to assess compliance.

Results: The study found that the average MGD across all units was 2.3 mGy, with individual values ranging from 0.95 to 4.10 mGy. Although 67% of the units maintained MGD values within the ACR threshold, 33% exceeded the recommended limit of 3 mGy. Higher MGD values were particularly common in non-accredited facilities, where the average MGD reached 2.7 mGy, compared to 1.6 mGy in accredited units, suggesting gaps in quality control and adherence to best practices in non-accredited centers.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the critical role of accreditation and adherence to quality standards in maintaining safe and effective mammography practices. While most mammography units in Jordan meet the ACR's recommended MGD limits, the elevated dose levels in some non-accredited facilities highlight the need for more rigorous implementation of accreditation standards. Improving compliance with established guidelines will enhance breast cancer screening effectiveness, ultimately supporting better early detection and outcomes for breast cancer in Jordan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信