Nebuhaler技术

J.G.A. Gleeson, J.F. Price
{"title":"Nebuhaler技术","authors":"J.G.A. Gleeson,&nbsp;J.F. Price","doi":"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90039-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two Nebuhaler techniques were compared by measuring the response to terbutaline 0.25 mg in 13 asthmatic children. Five breaths each sufficient to operate the Nebuhaler valve resulted in greater bronchodilatation after 10 minutes (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) than two deep inspirations from residual volume each held for 5 seconds. The peak responses were similar and both methods produced significant bronchodilatation compared with placebo. Either method is satisfactory in children but the former is easier to perform</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75618,"journal":{"name":"British journal of diseases of the chest","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 172-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90039-3","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nebuhaler technique\",\"authors\":\"J.G.A. Gleeson,&nbsp;J.F. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90039-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two Nebuhaler techniques were compared by measuring the response to terbutaline 0.25 mg in 13 asthmatic children. Five breaths each sufficient to operate the Nebuhaler valve resulted in greater bronchodilatation after 10 minutes (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) than two deep inspirations from residual volume each held for 5 seconds. The peak responses were similar and both methods produced significant bronchodilatation compared with placebo. Either method is satisfactory in children but the former is easier to perform</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 172-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90039-3\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

通过测量13例哮喘儿童对0.25 mg特布他林的反应,比较了两种Nebuhaler技术。5次呼吸,每次足以操作Nebuhaler阀,导致支气管扩张10分钟后(P<0.05)比两次深吸气从剩余容量,每次保持5秒。峰值反应相似,与安慰剂相比,两种方法都产生了显著的支气管扩张。两种方法对儿童都是令人满意的,但前者更容易执行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nebuhaler technique

Two Nebuhaler techniques were compared by measuring the response to terbutaline 0.25 mg in 13 asthmatic children. Five breaths each sufficient to operate the Nebuhaler valve resulted in greater bronchodilatation after 10 minutes (P<0.05) than two deep inspirations from residual volume each held for 5 seconds. The peak responses were similar and both methods produced significant bronchodilatation compared with placebo. Either method is satisfactory in children but the former is easier to perform

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信