埃塞俄比亚农村向资源导向型卫生过渡的障碍。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Thomas Ayalew Abebe, Josef Novotný, Jiří Hasman, Biruk Getachew Mamo, Gudina Terefe Tucho
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚农村向资源导向型卫生过渡的障碍。","authors":"Thomas Ayalew Abebe, Josef Novotný, Jiří Hasman, Biruk Getachew Mamo, Gudina Terefe Tucho","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-35887-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recycling excreta resources through resource-oriented toilet systems (ROTS) holds transformative potential, yet adoption remains limited, especially where benefits could be high. This study aims to understand constraints hindering the adoption of ROTS in one such area in Ethiopia. Based on a survey among 476 households comprising 2393 individuals, we examine the plans to use ROTS and willingness to pay for ROTS and apply structural equation modelling to analyze the drivers of these two outcomes while comparing the explanative power of the extended technology acceptance model, extended theory of planned behaviour, and their combined model. While 40% of households expressed a plan to use ROTS and 20% reported willingness to pay for a subsidized ROTS with a biogas unit, merely 7% revealed both the plan to use and sufficient willingness to pay, highlighting the need to target both these complementary outcomes concurrently. The theory of planned behaviour showed the best explanative power, also revealing that these two outcomes are influenced by partly distinct sets of factors. Findings imply that common efforts to ease objective constraints through subsidies, which incentivize willingness to pay, are necessary but not sufficient for facilitating the adoption of ROTS. To simultaneously enhance intentions to use, it is also recommended to target psychosocial drivers, such as perceived behavioural control and perceived community support, through awareness creation, behaviour change activities, and community engagement techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to transition to resource-oriented sanitation in rural Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Ayalew Abebe, Josef Novotný, Jiří Hasman, Biruk Getachew Mamo, Gudina Terefe Tucho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-35887-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recycling excreta resources through resource-oriented toilet systems (ROTS) holds transformative potential, yet adoption remains limited, especially where benefits could be high. This study aims to understand constraints hindering the adoption of ROTS in one such area in Ethiopia. Based on a survey among 476 households comprising 2393 individuals, we examine the plans to use ROTS and willingness to pay for ROTS and apply structural equation modelling to analyze the drivers of these two outcomes while comparing the explanative power of the extended technology acceptance model, extended theory of planned behaviour, and their combined model. While 40% of households expressed a plan to use ROTS and 20% reported willingness to pay for a subsidized ROTS with a biogas unit, merely 7% revealed both the plan to use and sufficient willingness to pay, highlighting the need to target both these complementary outcomes concurrently. The theory of planned behaviour showed the best explanative power, also revealing that these two outcomes are influenced by partly distinct sets of factors. Findings imply that common efforts to ease objective constraints through subsidies, which incentivize willingness to pay, are necessary but not sufficient for facilitating the adoption of ROTS. To simultaneously enhance intentions to use, it is also recommended to target psychosocial drivers, such as perceived behavioural control and perceived community support, through awareness creation, behaviour change activities, and community engagement techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-35887-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-35887-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过资源导向型厕所系统(rot)回收排泄物资源具有变革潜力,但采用仍然有限,特别是在效益可能很高的地方。本研究旨在了解阻碍在埃塞俄比亚这样一个地区采用rot的制约因素。基于对476个家庭2393个人的调查,我们考察了使用rot的计划和支付意愿,并应用结构方程模型分析了这两个结果的驱动因素,同时比较了扩展技术接受模型、扩展计划行为理论和它们的组合模型的解释力。虽然40%的家庭表示计划使用rot, 20%的家庭表示愿意支付带有沼气装置的补贴rot,但只有7%的家庭表示计划使用和足够的支付意愿,强调需要同时针对这两种互补的结果。计划行为理论表现出最好的解释力,也揭示了这两种结果受到部分不同因素的影响。研究结果表明,通过补贴来缓解客观限制的共同努力是必要的,但对于促进rot的采用是不够的。为了同时增强使用意愿,还建议通过提高认识、行为改变活动和社区参与技术,针对社会心理驱动因素,例如感知到的行为控制和感知到的社区支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to transition to resource-oriented sanitation in rural Ethiopia.

Recycling excreta resources through resource-oriented toilet systems (ROTS) holds transformative potential, yet adoption remains limited, especially where benefits could be high. This study aims to understand constraints hindering the adoption of ROTS in one such area in Ethiopia. Based on a survey among 476 households comprising 2393 individuals, we examine the plans to use ROTS and willingness to pay for ROTS and apply structural equation modelling to analyze the drivers of these two outcomes while comparing the explanative power of the extended technology acceptance model, extended theory of planned behaviour, and their combined model. While 40% of households expressed a plan to use ROTS and 20% reported willingness to pay for a subsidized ROTS with a biogas unit, merely 7% revealed both the plan to use and sufficient willingness to pay, highlighting the need to target both these complementary outcomes concurrently. The theory of planned behaviour showed the best explanative power, also revealing that these two outcomes are influenced by partly distinct sets of factors. Findings imply that common efforts to ease objective constraints through subsidies, which incentivize willingness to pay, are necessary but not sufficient for facilitating the adoption of ROTS. To simultaneously enhance intentions to use, it is also recommended to target psychosocial drivers, such as perceived behavioural control and perceived community support, through awareness creation, behaviour change activities, and community engagement techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信