980 nm二极管激光与10600nm CO2治疗牙龈黑色素沉着的比较研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2024.61
Reza Birang, Sayed Mohsen Sadeghi, Ehsan Birang, Nafiseh Birang, Reza Fekrazad, Samaneh Soltani, Nasim Chiniforush, Jaber Yaghini
{"title":"980 nm二极管激光与10600nm CO2治疗牙龈黑色素沉着的比较研究。","authors":"Reza Birang, Sayed Mohsen Sadeghi, Ehsan Birang, Nafiseh Birang, Reza Fekrazad, Samaneh Soltani, Nasim Chiniforush, Jaber Yaghini","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2024.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Gingival depigmentation with the help of lasers is known as an effective technique. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of 980nm diode and CO2 lasers in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. <b>Methods:</b> In this clinical trial study, 14 individuals (8 females and 6 males) with the age range of 19 to 47 years were selected. One quadrant was randomly treated with CO2 laser (10600 nm, non-contact, super pulse mode) and the opposite quadrant was treated with a diode laser (980 nm, continuous wave [CW], 1.5 W). The area of the pigmented region, Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI), the amount of changes in the RGB parameter (red, green, blue) and Δ<i>E</i>* in clinical photographs before, one and three months after the treatment were calculated by ImageJ and Photoshop software. Pain and discomfort were assessed one hour, one day and one week later by the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, after 3 months, the cosmetic results achieved for the different therapeutic approaches were evaluated by patients and professional evaluator. Data were analyzed by the paired samples <i>t</i> test, repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon test. <b>Results:</b> The results of this study showed that the duration of CO2 laser treatment was statistically and significantly shorter than the time of 980-diode laser treatment (<i>P</i><0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the pigmented lesion area (<i>P</i>>0.05), RGB parameter (<i>P</i>>0.05), DOPI index (<i>P</i>>0.05) and ΔE parameter (<i>P</i>>0.05) in one month and three months after treatment follow-ups between the two types of lasers. There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction (<i>P</i>>0.05) and professional evaluation (<i>P</i>>0.05) between the two groups of lasers. Post-treatment pain scores were not statistically significant between the two groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both 980-nm diode laser and 10600-nm CO2 are effective in the treatment of gingival depigmentation while CO2 laser radiation with super pulse mode is faster in terms of operating time. While working with the diode laser is more controllable. <b>Trial Registration Number:</b> IRCT20200309046728N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":"15 ","pages":"e61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Use of a 980 nm Diode Laser and 10600nm CO2 in the Treatment of Gingival Melanin Pigmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Birang, Sayed Mohsen Sadeghi, Ehsan Birang, Nafiseh Birang, Reza Fekrazad, Samaneh Soltani, Nasim Chiniforush, Jaber Yaghini\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/jlms.2024.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Gingival depigmentation with the help of lasers is known as an effective technique. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of 980nm diode and CO2 lasers in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. <b>Methods:</b> In this clinical trial study, 14 individuals (8 females and 6 males) with the age range of 19 to 47 years were selected. One quadrant was randomly treated with CO2 laser (10600 nm, non-contact, super pulse mode) and the opposite quadrant was treated with a diode laser (980 nm, continuous wave [CW], 1.5 W). The area of the pigmented region, Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI), the amount of changes in the RGB parameter (red, green, blue) and Δ<i>E</i>* in clinical photographs before, one and three months after the treatment were calculated by ImageJ and Photoshop software. Pain and discomfort were assessed one hour, one day and one week later by the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, after 3 months, the cosmetic results achieved for the different therapeutic approaches were evaluated by patients and professional evaluator. Data were analyzed by the paired samples <i>t</i> test, repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon test. <b>Results:</b> The results of this study showed that the duration of CO2 laser treatment was statistically and significantly shorter than the time of 980-diode laser treatment (<i>P</i><0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the pigmented lesion area (<i>P</i>>0.05), RGB parameter (<i>P</i>>0.05), DOPI index (<i>P</i>>0.05) and ΔE parameter (<i>P</i>>0.05) in one month and three months after treatment follow-ups between the two types of lasers. There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction (<i>P</i>>0.05) and professional evaluation (<i>P</i>>0.05) between the two groups of lasers. Post-treatment pain scores were not statistically significant between the two groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both 980-nm diode laser and 10600-nm CO2 are effective in the treatment of gingival depigmentation while CO2 laser radiation with super pulse mode is faster in terms of operating time. While working with the diode laser is more controllable. <b>Trial Registration Number:</b> IRCT20200309046728N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"e61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of lasers in medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2024.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在激光的帮助下牙龈脱色被认为是一种有效的技术。本研究的目的是比较980nm二极管和CO2激光治疗牙龈色素沉着的效率。方法:本临床试验选取年龄19 ~ 47岁的14例患者,其中女性8例,男性6例。随机选取一象限CO2激光(10600 nm,非接触式,超脉冲模式)治疗,另一象限用二极管激光(980 nm,连续波[CW], 1.5 W)治疗,通过ImageJ和Photoshop软件计算治疗前、治疗后1个月、治疗后3个月临床照片中色素区面积、Dummett口腔色素沉着指数(DOPI)、RGB参数(红、绿、蓝)及ΔE*的变化量。分别于1小时、1天和1周后用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评定疼痛和不适程度。3个月后,由患者和专业评估人员对不同治疗方法的美容效果进行评估。数据分析采用配对样本t检验、重复测量方差分析和Wilcoxon检验。结果:本研究结果显示,两种激光治疗1个月和治疗后3个月随访时间,CO2激光治疗持续时间均显著短于980二极管激光治疗(PP>0.05)、RGB参数(P>0.05)、DOPI指数(P>0.05)和ΔE参数(P>0.05)。两组激光在患者满意度(P>0.05)和专业评价(P>0.05)方面差异无统计学意义。两组治疗后疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。结论:980 nm二极管激光与10600 nm CO2激光均可有效治疗牙龈色素脱色,超脉冲模式CO2激光在手术时间上更快。而与二极管一起工作,激光的可控性更强。试验注册号:IRCT20200309046728N1;https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of the Use of a 980 nm Diode Laser and 10600nm CO2 in the Treatment of Gingival Melanin Pigmentation.

Introduction: Gingival depigmentation with the help of lasers is known as an effective technique. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of 980nm diode and CO2 lasers in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. Methods: In this clinical trial study, 14 individuals (8 females and 6 males) with the age range of 19 to 47 years were selected. One quadrant was randomly treated with CO2 laser (10600 nm, non-contact, super pulse mode) and the opposite quadrant was treated with a diode laser (980 nm, continuous wave [CW], 1.5 W). The area of the pigmented region, Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI), the amount of changes in the RGB parameter (red, green, blue) and ΔE* in clinical photographs before, one and three months after the treatment were calculated by ImageJ and Photoshop software. Pain and discomfort were assessed one hour, one day and one week later by the visual analogue scale (VAS). In addition, after 3 months, the cosmetic results achieved for the different therapeutic approaches were evaluated by patients and professional evaluator. Data were analyzed by the paired samples t test, repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon test. Results: The results of this study showed that the duration of CO2 laser treatment was statistically and significantly shorter than the time of 980-diode laser treatment (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the pigmented lesion area (P>0.05), RGB parameter (P>0.05), DOPI index (P>0.05) and ΔE parameter (P>0.05) in one month and three months after treatment follow-ups between the two types of lasers. There was no statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction (P>0.05) and professional evaluation (P>0.05) between the two groups of lasers. Post-treatment pain scores were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion: Both 980-nm diode laser and 10600-nm CO2 are effective in the treatment of gingival depigmentation while CO2 laser radiation with super pulse mode is faster in terms of operating time. While working with the diode laser is more controllable. Trial Registration Number: IRCT20200309046728N1; https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信