XP-endo塑形器及其对治疗后不适的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammad Sabeti, Julian Gabbay, David Lotfi
{"title":"XP-endo塑形器及其对治疗后不适的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammad Sabeti, Julian Gabbay, David Lotfi","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of the XP-endo Shaper (XPS) on postoperative pain following root canal treatment and compare its efficacy with other endodontic systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000-August 2024. Randomized controlled trials using XPS and reporting postoperative pain were included. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale at multiple postoperative time points. Data were pooled and analyzed using a random effects model, revealing significant heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials involving 731 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that XPS significantly reduced pain scores at the 6, 12, and 24-hour time points (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.36, -0.24], P = .016; SMD -3.00, 95% CI [-3.54, -2.46], P < .001; SMD -0.91, 95% CI [-1.53, -0.28], P = .005, respectively) compared to other systems, including WaveOne Gold and HyFlex EDM. Pain scores beyond 48 hours were comparable between XPS and other file systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XPS shows substantial short-term efficacy in reducing postoperative pain following root canal treatments, likely due to its flexible design and reduced debris extrusion. The findings suggest that XPS can potentially improve patient comfort, though long-term pain outcomes remain similar to other systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The XP-endo Shaper and Its Impact on Posttreatment Discomfort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Sabeti, Julian Gabbay, David Lotfi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of the XP-endo Shaper (XPS) on postoperative pain following root canal treatment and compare its efficacy with other endodontic systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000-August 2024. Randomized controlled trials using XPS and reporting postoperative pain were included. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale at multiple postoperative time points. Data were pooled and analyzed using a random effects model, revealing significant heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials involving 731 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that XPS significantly reduced pain scores at the 6, 12, and 24-hour time points (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.36, -0.24], P = .016; SMD -3.00, 95% CI [-3.54, -2.46], P < .001; SMD -0.91, 95% CI [-1.53, -0.28], P = .005, respectively) compared to other systems, including WaveOne Gold and HyFlex EDM. Pain scores beyond 48 hours were comparable between XPS and other file systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>XPS shows substantial short-term efficacy in reducing postoperative pain following root canal treatments, likely due to its flexible design and reduced debris extrusion. The findings suggest that XPS can potentially improve patient comfort, though long-term pain outcomes remain similar to other systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2024.12.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了XP-endo Shaper (XPS)对根管治疗(rct)术后疼痛的影响,并将其与其他根管系统的疗效进行了比较。方法:检索2000年1月~ 2024年8月MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library等数据库的文献。纳入使用XPS和报告术后疼痛的随机对照试验。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)在术后多个时间点测量疼痛水平。使用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总和分析,显示出显著的异质性。结果:6项随机对照试验731例患者符合纳入标准。合并分析显示,XPS显著降低了6、12和24小时时间点的疼痛评分(SMD -1.30, 95% CI [-2.36, -0.24], p = 0.016;SMD -3.00, 95% CI [-3.54, -2.46], p < 0.001;SMD -0.91, 95% CI [-1.53, -0.28], p = 0.005),与其他系统相比,包括WaveOne Gold (WOG)和HyFlex EDM (HEDM)。超过48小时的疼痛评分在XPS和其他文件系统之间具有可比性。结论:在随机对照试验中,XPS在减轻术后疼痛方面显示出显著的短期疗效,这可能是由于其灵活的设计和减少碎片挤压。研究结果表明,尽管长期疼痛结果与其他系统相似,但XPS可能会改善患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The XP-endo Shaper and Its Impact on Posttreatment Discomfort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of the XP-endo Shaper (XPS) on postoperative pain following root canal treatment and compare its efficacy with other endodontic systems.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000-August 2024. Randomized controlled trials using XPS and reporting postoperative pain were included. Pain levels were measured using the Visual Analog Scale at multiple postoperative time points. Data were pooled and analyzed using a random effects model, revealing significant heterogeneity.

Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 731 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that XPS significantly reduced pain scores at the 6, 12, and 24-hour time points (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.36, -0.24], P = .016; SMD -3.00, 95% CI [-3.54, -2.46], P < .001; SMD -0.91, 95% CI [-1.53, -0.28], P = .005, respectively) compared to other systems, including WaveOne Gold and HyFlex EDM. Pain scores beyond 48 hours were comparable between XPS and other file systems.

Conclusions: XPS shows substantial short-term efficacy in reducing postoperative pain following root canal treatments, likely due to its flexible design and reduced debris extrusion. The findings suggest that XPS can potentially improve patient comfort, though long-term pain outcomes remain similar to other systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信